Mousavi Seyed Ghafur, Mirnezafat Shima, Tarrahi Mohammad Javad
Department of Psychiatry, Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Adv Biomed Res. 2019 Jun 28;8:43. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_229_18. eCollection 2019.
Knowledge and skill about sedation of aggressive patients is necessary for each psychiatrist. The purpose of this study was comparing the velocity and durability of sedation induced by the haloperidol, trifluoperazine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine in aggressive patients.
This randomized clinical trial was done on 76 aggressive patients referred to Psychiatry Emergency Service of Noor Hospital of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences that were randomly divided into four groups of haloperidol, promethazine, chlorpromazine, and trifluoperazine. Patients were evaluated at 30 min intervals for aggressive symptoms, and if they did not respond to intervention after the first 30 min or if they showed aggression again, a same dose of the injected drug was prescribed. The length of sedation time was recorded for each patient.
Seventy-six patients with the mean age of 31.89 ± 8.73 years were participated and 63.2% of them were male. Response to intervention after the first injection was seen in 40.8% and 59.2% needed the second injection. The mean time needed for obtaining sedation was 17.38 ± 8.23 and 19.66 ± 4.64 min after the first and second injection, respectively. The mean times of sedation induction were not significantly related to age, gender, type of substance used, type of aggression, and type of psychiatric disorder. Considering the type of drugs, there was no significant difference between velocity and durability effect of sedation after the first and second injection.
Comparing the velocity and durability of sedative effect of the four studied drugs on acute aggressive patients, did not show any significant difference between them.
每位精神科医生都需掌握对攻击性患者进行镇静的知识与技能。本研究旨在比较氟哌啶醇、三氟拉嗪、异丙嗪和氯丙嗪对攻击性患者诱导镇静的速度和持续时间。
本随机临床试验对76名转诊至伊斯法罕医科大学努尔医院精神科急诊的攻击性患者进行,这些患者被随机分为氟哌啶醇、异丙嗪、氯丙嗪和三氟拉嗪四组。每隔30分钟对患者的攻击症状进行评估,若患者在首次30分钟干预后无反应或再次出现攻击行为,则给予相同剂量的注射药物。记录每位患者的镇静时间长度。
76名患者参与研究,平均年龄为31.89±8.73岁,其中63.2%为男性。首次注射后40.8%的患者对干预有反应,59.2%的患者需要第二次注射。首次和第二次注射后达到镇静所需的平均时间分别为17.38±8.23分钟和19.66±4.64分钟。镇静诱导的平均时间与年龄、性别、使用物质类型、攻击类型和精神障碍类型无显著相关性。就药物类型而言,首次和第二次注射后镇静的速度和持续效果之间无显著差异。
比较四种研究药物对急性攻击性患者镇静作用的速度和持续时间,发现它们之间无显著差异。