• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤学价值框架输出的可靠性:独立研究组之间的一致性

Reliability of Oncology Value Framework Outputs: Concordance Between Independent Research Groups.

作者信息

Del Paggio Joseph C, Cheng Sierra, Booth Christopher M, Cheung Matthew C, Chan Kelvin K W

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.

Departments of Oncology and Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Dec 13;2(3):pky050. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky050. eCollection 2018 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/jncics/pky050
PMID:31360865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6650061/
Abstract

Research groups are increasingly utilizing value frameworks, but little is known of their reliability. To assess framework concordance and interrater reliability between two major value frameworks currently in use, we identified all previously published datasets containing both scores from the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework (ASCO-VF) and grades from the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess interrater reliability. Four eligible studies contained drugs evaluated by both value frameworks, resulting in a dataset of 39 grades/scores for discrete drug indications. ICC was 0.82 (95% confidence interval = 0.70 to 0.90) for ASCO-VF and 0.88 (95% confidence interval = 0.80 to 0.93) for ESMO-MCBS. Absolute concordance was found to be 5% for ASCO-VF and 44% for ESMO-MCBS, increasing to 74% and 80% when deviations within 20 points and 1 grade were considered, respectively. Interrater reliability of ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS is, therefore, near perfect, while absolute concordance is poor. This has implications when considering framework outputs in drug funding or treatment decision making.

摘要

研究小组越来越多地使用价值框架,但对其可靠性却知之甚少。为了评估目前正在使用的两个主要价值框架之间的框架一致性和评分者间信度,我们识别了所有先前发表的数据集,这些数据集既包含美国临床肿瘤学会价值框架(ASCO-VF)的评分,也包含欧洲医学肿瘤学会-临床获益程度量表(ESMO-MCBS)的分级。组内相关系数(ICC)用于评估评分者间信度。四项符合条件的研究包含了两个价值框架都评估过的药物,从而形成了一个包含39个离散药物适应症分级/评分的数据集。ASCO-VF的ICC为0.82(95%置信区间=0.70至0.90),ESMO-MCBS的ICC为0.88(95%置信区间=0.80至0.93)。发现ASCO-VF的绝对一致性为5%,ESMO-MCBS为44%,当分别考虑20分以内的偏差和1级以内的偏差时,一致性分别增至74%和80%。因此,ASCO-VF和ESMO-MCBS的评分者间信度接近完美,但绝对一致性较差。这在考虑药物资助或治疗决策中的框架输出时具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Reliability of Oncology Value Framework Outputs: Concordance Between Independent Research Groups.肿瘤学价值框架输出的可靠性:独立研究组之间的一致性
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Dec 13;2(3):pky050. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky050. eCollection 2018 Jul.
2
Clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved in Switzerland 2010-2019.2010-2019 年在瑞士获批的癌症药物的临床获益。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 10;17(6):e0268545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268545. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of Long-term Survival Benefits in Trials of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor vs Non-Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anticancer Agents Using ASCO Value Framework and ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale.采用 ASCO 价值框架和 ESMO 临床获益量表比较免疫检查点抑制剂与非免疫检查点抑制剂抗癌药物临床试验中的长期生存获益。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196803. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6803.
4
Measuring the Value of New Drugs: Validity and Reliability of 4 Value Assessment Frameworks in the Oncology Setting.衡量新药的价值:4 种肿瘤学评估框架的有效性和可靠性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jun;23(6-a Suppl):S34-S48. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.6-a.s34.
5
Clinical benefit and cost of breakthrough cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.美国食品和药物管理局批准的突破性癌症药物的临床获益和成本。
Cancer. 2020 Oct 1;126(19):4390-4399. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33095. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
6
Do the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework and the European Society of Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Measure the Same Construct of Clinical Benefit?美国临床肿瘤学会价值框架和欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床获益幅度量表是否衡量相同的临床获益构建?
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 20;35(24):2764-2771. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.6894. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
7
Evaluation of changes in the clinical benefits of oncology drugs over time following reimbursement using the ASCO-VF and the ESMO-MCBS.使用美国临床肿瘤学会价值框架(ASCO-VF)和欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床效益量表(ESMO-MCBS)评估肿瘤药物报销后随时间推移临床效益的变化。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar 4;150(3):113. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05587-0.
8
Examining the association between oncology drug clinical benefit and the time to public reimbursement.考察肿瘤药物临床获益与公共报销时间之间的关联。
Cancer Med. 2022 Jan;11(2):380-391. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4455. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
9
Comparative Assessment of Clinical Benefit Using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Version 1.1 and the ASCO Value Framework Net Health Benefit Score.使用 ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale 版本 1.1 和 ASCO 价值框架净健康获益评分对临床获益进行比较评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;37(4):336-349. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00729. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
10
Choosing PD-1 Inhibitors in Oncology Setting, Left or Right?-Lessons From Value Assessment With ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS.肿瘤治疗中如何选择PD-1抑制剂,该选左边的还是右边的?——来自美国临床肿瘤学会价值框架(ASCO-VF)和欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床效益量表(ESMO-MCBS)价值评估的经验教训
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Dec 18;11:574511. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.574511. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials and ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Two Sides of the Same Coin, to Grade Recommendations for Drug Approval?随机临床试验质量与ESMO临床获益量表程度是否为药物批准分级建议的同一枚硬币的两面?
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 13;10(4):746. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040746.
2
Assessment of Food and Drug Administration- and European Medicines Agency-Approved Systemic Oncology Therapies and Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Quality of Life: A Systematic Review.评估食品和药物管理局和欧洲药品管理局批准的系统肿瘤治疗药物以及对生活质量有临床意义的改善:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2033004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33004.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Examining Trends in Cost and Clinical Benefit of Novel Anticancer Drugs Over Time.随着时间的推移检查新型抗癌药物的成本和临床获益趋势。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 May;14(5):e280-e294. doi: 10.1200/JOP.17.00058. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
2
Are Value Frameworks Missing the Mark When Considering Long-term Benefits From Immuno-oncology Drugs?在考虑免疫肿瘤药物的长期效益时,价值框架是否偏离了目标?
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;4(3):333-334. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4339.
3
Reply to the letter to the editor 'Re-aligning the ASCO and ESMO clinical benefit frameworks or modern cancer therapies'.
Clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors approved by US Food and Drug Administration.
美国食品和药物管理局批准的免疫检查点抑制剂的临床获益。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 31;20(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07313-2.
Ann Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;29(3):774-775. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx747.
4
Re-aligning the ASCO and ESMO clinical benefit frameworks for modern cancer therapies.重新调整美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)和欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)针对现代癌症疗法的临床获益框架。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;29(3):773-774. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx721.
5
ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1.ESMO-临床获益量表 1.1 版
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2340-2366. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx310.
6
Delivery of meaningful cancer care: a retrospective cohort study assessing cost and benefit with the ASCO and ESMO frameworks.提供有意义的癌症护理:一项使用 ASCO 和 ESMO 框架评估成本和效益的回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):887-894. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30415-1. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
7
Do the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework and the European Society of Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Measure the Same Construct of Clinical Benefit?美国临床肿瘤学会价值框架和欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床获益幅度量表是否衡量相同的临床获益构建?
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 20;35(24):2764-2771. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.6894. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
8
Measuring the Value of New Drugs: Validity and Reliability of 4 Value Assessment Frameworks in the Oncology Setting.衡量新药的价值:4 种肿瘤学评估框架的有效性和可靠性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jun;23(6-a Suppl):S34-S48. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.6-a.s34.
9
Exploration of the ASCO and ESMO Value Frameworks for Antineoplastic Drugs.抗肿瘤药物的美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)和欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)价值框架探索。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Jul;13(7):e653-e665. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.020339. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
Clinical benefit, price and approval characteristics of FDA-approved new drugs for treating advanced solid cancer, 2000-2015.2000-2015 年美国食品和药物管理局批准治疗晚期实体瘤新药的临床获益、价格和审批特点。
Ann Oncol. 2017 May 1;28(5):1111-1116. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx053.