Bernard Fabien, Zare Mohsen, Sagot Jean-Claude, Paquin Raphael
40200 Airbus, Marignane, France and University of Technology of Belfort-Montbéliard-University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France.
26999 University of Technology of Belfort-Montbéliard-University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France.
Hum Factors. 2020 Feb;62(1):37-54. doi: 10.1177/0018720819861496. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
This research aimed to evaluate the differences in the assessments made by three simulation tools used in a maintainability design office to perform human factor/ergonomics (HFE) analysis: digital human modeling (DHM), virtual reality (VR), and physical mock-up (PMU).
Maintainability engineers use digital/physical simulation tools in the early design phase to analyze whether the design is well adapted for maintenance operators. Knowing the potential of these simulation tools would encourage maintainability stakeholders to integrate HFE in the design process more efficiently.
Eleven maintenance tasks were analyzed from the participation of six maintenance operators. Various HFE indicators including physical, cognitive, and organizational indicators were assessed. Each operator repeated 11 maintenance tasks on VR and PMU. Based on the anthropometric parameters, six manikins were created to analyze 11 maintenance tasks on DHM.
A significant difference was found for the organizational indicators between VR and PMU, whereas the physical and cognitive indicators are similar. DHM, VR, and PMU are compared with the common HFE indicators for the physical dimension and present a significant difference for individual tasks.
To reduce the gap between simulation tools, a better physical representation is requested on the VR platform, improving the perception of work sequences in the virtual world. Concerning DHM, a new paradigm is proposed to study a few tasks per work area instead of studying each task independently.
This study will help develop a new methodology and tools specifically for non-HFE experts in the maintainability department.
本研究旨在评估在可维护性设计办公室用于进行人因/工效学(HFE)分析的三种模拟工具所做评估的差异:数字人体建模(DHM)、虚拟现实(VR)和实体模型(PMU)。
可维护性工程师在设计早期阶段使用数字/实体模拟工具来分析设计是否适合维护操作员。了解这些模拟工具的潜力将鼓励可维护性相关人员更有效地将人因工程学融入设计过程。
通过六名维护操作员的参与对十一项维护任务进行了分析。评估了包括身体、认知和组织指标在内的各种人因工程学指标。每位操作员在VR和PMU上重复进行十一项维护任务。根据人体测量参数创建了六个人体模型,以在DHM上分析十一项维护任务。
发现VR和PMU在组织指标上存在显著差异,而身体和认知指标相似。将DHM、VR和PMU与物理维度的常见人因工程学指标进行比较,发现个别任务存在显著差异。
为缩小模拟工具之间的差距,需要在VR平台上有更好的物理表现,以改善在虚拟世界中对工作顺序的感知。关于DHM,提出了一种新范式,即按工作区域研究少数任务而非独立研究每个任务。
本研究将有助于为可维护性部门的非人体工程学专家开发一种专门的新方法和工具。