• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于在自由活动环境中检测人体运动的双加速度计系统。

A Dual-Accelerometer System for Detecting Human Movement in a Free-living Environment.

机构信息

School of Sport and Recreation, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, NEW ZEALAND.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Jan;52(1):252-258. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002107.

DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002107
PMID:31361712
Abstract

PURPOSE

Accurate measurement of various human movement behaviors is essential in developing 24-h movement profiles. A dual-accelerometer system recently showed promising results for accurately classifying a broad range of behaviors in a controlled laboratory environment. As a progressive step, the aim of this study is to validate the same dual-accelerometer system in semi free-living conditions in children and adults. The efficacy of several placement sites (e.g., wrist, thigh, back) was evaluated for comparison.

METHODS

Thirty participants (15 children) wore three Axivity AX3 accelerometers alongside an automated clip camera (clipped to the lapel) that recorded video of their free-living environment (ground truth criterion measure of physical activity). Participants were encouraged to complete a range of daily-living activities within a 2-h timeframe. A random forest machine-learning classifier was trained using features generated from the raw accelerometer data. Three different placement combinations were examined (thigh-back, thigh-wrist, back-wrist), and their performance was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation for the child and adult samples separately.

RESULTS

Machine learning models developed using the thigh-back accelerometer combination performed the best in distinguishing seven distinct activity classes with an overall accuracy of 95.6% in the adult sample, and eight activity classes with an overall accuracy of 92.0% in the child sample. There was a drop in accuracy (at least 11.0%) when other placement combinations were evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

This validation study demonstrated that a dual-accelerometer system previously validated in a laboratory setting also performs well in semi free-living conditions. Although these results are promising and progressive, further work is needed to expand the scope of this measurement system to detect other components of behavior (e.g., activity intensity and sleep) that are related to health.

摘要

目的

在开发 24 小时活动概况时,准确测量各种人体运动行为至关重要。最近的双加速计系统在准确分类广泛的行为方面显示出了有前途的结果,在受控的实验室环境中。作为一个渐进的步骤,本研究的目的是验证相同的双加速计系统在儿童和成人的半自由生活条件下的有效性。评估了几个放置位置(例如,手腕,大腿,背部)的效果进行比较。

方法

30 名参与者(15 名儿童)佩戴了三个 Axivity AX3 加速度计和一个自动夹式相机(夹在翻领上),该相机记录了他们自由生活环境的视频(体力活动的地面真实标准测量)。鼓励参与者在 2 小时的时间内完成一系列日常活动。使用从原始加速度计数据生成的特征训练随机森林机器学习分类器。检查了三种不同的放置组合(大腿-背部,大腿-手腕,背部-手腕),并分别对儿童和成人样本使用留一交叉验证评估其性能。

结果

使用大腿-背部加速度计组合开发的机器学习模型在区分七个不同的活动类别的表现最好,在成人样本中的总体准确率为 95.6%,在儿童样本中的总体准确率为 92.0%。当评估其他放置组合时,准确性会下降(至少 11.0%)。

结论

这项验证研究表明,以前在实验室环境中验证过的双加速计系统在半自由生活条件下也能很好地工作。虽然这些结果很有希望和进步,但需要进一步的工作来扩展这个测量系统的范围,以检测与健康相关的其他行为成分(例如,活动强度和睡眠)。

相似文献

1
A Dual-Accelerometer System for Detecting Human Movement in a Free-living Environment.一种用于在自由活动环境中检测人体运动的双加速度计系统。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Jan;52(1):252-258. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002107.
2
A Dual-Accelerometer System for Classifying Physical Activity in Children and Adults.一种用于儿童和成人身体活动分类的双加速计系统。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Dec;50(12):2595-2602. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001717.
3
Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer.腕戴加速度计的体力活动强度预测的交叉验证和样本外测试。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 May 1;124(5):1284-1293. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00760.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
4
Free-living Evaluation of Laboratory-based Activity Classifiers in Preschoolers.自由活动评估实验室活动分类器在学龄前儿童中的应用。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 May;52(5):1227-1234. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002221.
5
Wear-Time Compliance with a Dual-Accelerometer System for Capturing 24-h Behavioural Profiles in Children and Adults.佩戴时间对使用双加速计系统获取儿童和成人 24 小时行为特征的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 21;15(7):1296. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071296.
6
Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data.用于腕部佩戴式加速度计数据的随机森林活动分类器的现场评估。
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Jan;20(1):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
7
Machine Learning Models for Classifying Physical Activity in Free-Living Preschool Children.用于在自由活动的学龄前儿童中分类身体活动的机器学习模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 5;20(16):4364. doi: 10.3390/s20164364.
8
Hip and Wrist-Worn Accelerometer Data Analysis for Toddler Activities.婴幼儿活动的髋部和腕部佩戴加速度计数据的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 21;16(14):2598. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142598.
9
Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification.用于自由生活行为分类的髋部和腕部加速度计算法
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 May;48(5):933-40. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000840.
10
Application of Raw Accelerometer Data and Machine-Learning Techniques to Characterize Human Movement Behavior: A Systematic Scoping Review.应用原始加速度计数据和机器学习技术来描述人类运动行为:系统范围综述。
J Phys Act Health. 2020 Mar 1;17(3):360-383. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0088.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and comparing a new BMI inclusive energy expenditure algorithm on wrist-worn wearables.开发并比较一种适用于腕戴式可穿戴设备的包含BMI的新能量消耗算法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 19;15(1):20060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99963-0.
2
Patient Acceptability and Technical Reliability of Wearable Devices Used for Monitoring People With Parkinson Disease: Survey Study.用于监测帕金森病患者的可穿戴设备的患者可接受性和技术可靠性:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 25;9:e63704. doi: 10.2196/63704.
3
Monitoring of child-specific activities in ambulatory children with and without developmental disabilities.
对有和没有发育障碍的门诊儿童特定活动的监测。
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05489-9.
4
Federated Learning for IoMT-Enhanced Human Activity Recognition with Hybrid LSTM-GRU Networks.基于混合长短期记忆门控循环单元网络的物联网增强型人类活动识别联合学习
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Feb 3;25(3):907. doi: 10.3390/s25030907.
5
Validation of two novel human activity recognition models for typically developing children and children with Cerebral Palsy.验证两种新型人类活动识别模型在正常发育儿童和脑瘫儿童中的有效性。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 23;19(9):e0308853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308853. eCollection 2024.
6
Thigh-worn accelerometry: a comparative study of two no-code classification methods for identifying physical activity types.大腿佩戴加速度计:两种无代码分类方法识别身体活动类型的比较研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Jul 17;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01627-1.
7
Associations of habitual sedentary time with executive functioning and short-term memory in 7th and 8th grade adolescents.青少年 7 至 8 年级时,习惯性久坐时间与执行功能和短期记忆的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18014-x.
8
Hoosier Sport: a research protocol for a multilevel physical activity-based intervention in rural Indiana.印第安纳农村多层次基于体力活动的干预研究方案: Hoosier Sport
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 27;11:1243560. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1243560. eCollection 2023.
9
Reference values for wrist-worn accelerometer physical activity metrics in England children and adolescents.英国儿童和青少年腕戴加速度计体力活动指标的参考值。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Mar 25;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01435-z.
10
Validation of an Activity Type Recognition Model Classifying Daily Physical Behavior in Older Adults: The HAR70+ Model.验证一种活动类型识别模型,用于分类老年人的日常身体行为:HAR70+模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;23(5):2368. doi: 10.3390/s23052368.