Mohan Swapna, Foley Patricia L
NIH, Previously OLAW/OD, Bethesda, Maryland.
Georgetown University, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Washington, DC.
ILAR J. 2019 Dec 31;60(1):50-57. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilz010.
There have been recent efforts to reduce the administrative burden imposed on investigators. Although a complete and thorough review of proposed animal studies is an essential function of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), efforts to streamline and clarify this process may help investigators spend less time writing animal use protocols and responding to committee comments. The IACUC relies on well-written protocols for an efficient review process. A well-designed protocol form is also critical in guiding investigators through the process. However, it is ultimately the investigators' responsibility to ensure that the information they provide answers all the IACUC's questions with enough detail and quality for a fast and effective review. This article, aimed primarily for researchers but also IACUC administrators, provides an overview of the IACUC protocol review and approval process, the criteria that the IACUC uses for evaluations, and the type of information that should be included in the various sections of the protocol form. Some specific examples are also provided.
最近一直在努力减轻施加在研究人员身上的行政负担。虽然对提议的动物研究进行全面彻底的审查是机构动物护理和使用委员会(IACUC)的一项基本职能,但简化和澄清这一过程的努力可能有助于研究人员减少撰写动物使用方案和回应委员会意见的时间。IACUC依靠撰写良好的方案进行高效审查。精心设计的方案表格对于指导研究人员完成这一过程也至关重要。然而,确保他们提供的信息能以足够的细节和质量回答IACUC的所有问题,从而实现快速有效的审查,最终仍是研究人员的责任。本文主要面向研究人员,同时也供IACUC管理人员参考,概述了IACUC方案审查和批准过程、IACUC用于评估的标准,以及方案表格各部分应包含的信息类型。还提供了一些具体示例。