Suppr超能文献

关于满足实验动物管理与使用委员会(IACUC)协议要求你需要了解的一切。

Everything You Need to Know About Satisfying IACUC Protocol Requirements.

作者信息

Mohan Swapna, Foley Patricia L

机构信息

NIH, Previously OLAW/OD, Bethesda, Maryland.

Georgetown University, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Washington, DC.

出版信息

ILAR J. 2019 Dec 31;60(1):50-57. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilz010.

Abstract

There have been recent efforts to reduce the administrative burden imposed on investigators. Although a complete and thorough review of proposed animal studies is an essential function of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), efforts to streamline and clarify this process may help investigators spend less time writing animal use protocols and responding to committee comments. The IACUC relies on well-written protocols for an efficient review process. A well-designed protocol form is also critical in guiding investigators through the process. However, it is ultimately the investigators' responsibility to ensure that the information they provide answers all the IACUC's questions with enough detail and quality for a fast and effective review. This article, aimed primarily for researchers but also IACUC administrators, provides an overview of the IACUC protocol review and approval process, the criteria that the IACUC uses for evaluations, and the type of information that should be included in the various sections of the protocol form. Some specific examples are also provided.

摘要

最近一直在努力减轻施加在研究人员身上的行政负担。虽然对提议的动物研究进行全面彻底的审查是机构动物护理和使用委员会(IACUC)的一项基本职能,但简化和澄清这一过程的努力可能有助于研究人员减少撰写动物使用方案和回应委员会意见的时间。IACUC依靠撰写良好的方案进行高效审查。精心设计的方案表格对于指导研究人员完成这一过程也至关重要。然而,确保他们提供的信息能以足够的细节和质量回答IACUC的所有问题,从而实现快速有效的审查,最终仍是研究人员的责任。本文主要面向研究人员,同时也供IACUC管理人员参考,概述了IACUC方案审查和批准过程、IACUC用于评估的标准,以及方案表格各部分应包含的信息类型。还提供了一些具体示例。

相似文献

6
Lapse in Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Continuing Reviews.实验动物管理与使用委员会持续审查的失误。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 8;11(9):e0162141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162141. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

8
Evaluating IACUCs: Previous Research and Future Directions.评估 IACUC:既往研究与未来方向
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2020 Nov 1;59(6):656-664. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-20-000077. Epub 2020 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Studying both sexes: a guiding principle for biomedicine.研究两性:生物医学的一项指导原则。
FASEB J. 2016 Feb;30(2):519-24. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-279554. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
3
Pain in laboratory animals: the ethical and regulatory imperatives.实验动物的疼痛:伦理与监管要求
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e21578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021578. Epub 2011 Sep 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验