Suppr超能文献

比较腔内注射博来霉素与曲安奈德治疗瘢痕疙瘩的疗效。

Comparison of the efficacy of intralesional bleomycin versus intralesional triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of keloids.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.

出版信息

Dermatol Ther. 2019 Sep;32(5):e13036. doi: 10.1111/dth.13036. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

Abstract

Keloid is characterized by benign overgrowth of dermal collagen in response to skin injury in genetically predisposed individuals. Intralesional triamcinolone and bleomycin have been used with varying success in the treatment of keloids. To compare the efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone versus intralesional bleomycin in the treatment keloids. A total of 164 patients were randomized into two of 82 each. Group A received intralesional bleomycine and Group B received intralesional triamcinolone. Patients were scored at baseline and at the end of treatment for therapeutic response based on reduction on patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS). Mean baseline POSAS score was 91 ± 10.98 SD check in Group A and 90 ± 10.85 SD in Group B. POSAS score after 24 weeks 26 SD ± 11.91 in Group and 34 ± 12.28 in Group B. This difference was statistically difference. Intralesional bleomycin is more efficacious than intralesional triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of keloids.

摘要

瘢痕疙瘩的特征是在遗传易感个体中,皮肤损伤后真皮胶原的良性过度生长。局部注射曲安奈德和博来霉素已被用于治疗瘢痕疙瘩,取得了不同程度的成功。本研究旨在比较局部注射曲安奈德与博来霉素治疗瘢痕疙瘩的疗效。共有 164 名患者随机分为两组,每组 82 名。A 组接受博来霉素局部注射,B 组接受曲安奈德局部注射。根据患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)的评分,在基线和治疗结束时对治疗反应进行评分。A 组的基线 POSAS 评分平均为 91±10.98 SD,B 组为 90±10.85 SD。24 周后,A 组的 POSAS 评分为 26±11.91,B 组为 34±12.28。这种差异具有统计学意义。博来霉素局部注射比曲安奈德局部注射更能有效治疗瘢痕疙瘩。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验