Korkmaz Yasemin Nur, Buyuk Suleyman Kutalmış
Deparment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Mar;57(3):327-332. doi: 10.1177/1055665619866349. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the content and quality of the popular videos on YouTube about the treatment of cleft lip and palate.
Retrospective, YouTube video analysis.
The 3 keywords "cleft lip and palate surgery," "cleft lip and palate treatment," and "cleft lip and palate repair" were searched on YouTube. After sorted by view-count, final 50 videos were analyzed for general characteristics, primary purpose, information content, relevance, audiovisual quality, and also viewers' interaction index, and viewing rate formulas were calculated for each video. Kruskal Wallis and one-way analysis of variance tests were used to compare the video parameters between good, moderate, and poor information content videos.
The viewing rate was significantly higher in good content videos ( = .003). Most of the videos were uploaded by a clinic (32%), a surgeon (20%), or individuals (22%) who shared their own experience. Most of the videos (54.00%) were classified as moderate general information content and 26.00% were rated as poor, and 20.00% were rated as good. Videos generally involved patient information (60.00%), followed by patient parent's experience (14.00%), and cleft lip and palate surgery (12.00%). The average viewers' interaction index of all evaluated YouTube videos was 0.36.
Although most of the videos were rated as moderate regarding the sufficiency of the information, the results of this study showed that YouTube could still not be considered as a fully reliable source of information for patients on treatment of cleft lip and palate.
本研究旨在评估YouTube上有关唇腭裂治疗的热门视频的内容和质量。
回顾性YouTube视频分析。
在YouTube上搜索“唇腭裂手术”“唇腭裂治疗”和“唇腭裂修复”这3个关键词。按观看次数排序后,对最终的50个视频进行一般特征、主要目的、信息内容、相关性、视听质量分析,并计算每个视频的观众互动指数和观看率公式。采用Kruskal Wallis检验和单因素方差分析来比较信息内容良好、中等和较差的视频之间的视频参数。
信息内容良好的视频的观看率显著更高(P = .003)。大多数视频由诊所(32%)、外科医生(20%)或分享自身经历的个人(22%)上传。大多数视频(54.00%)被归类为一般信息内容中等,26.00%被评为较差,20.00%被评为良好。视频内容通常涉及患者信息(60.00%),其次是患者父母的经历(14.00%)和唇腭裂手术(12.00%)。所有评估的YouTube视频的平均观众互动指数为0.36。
尽管大多数视频在信息充分性方面被评为中等,但本研究结果表明,YouTube仍不能被视为患者获取唇腭裂治疗信息的完全可靠来源。