• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与复杂性阑尾炎相关的因素:来自中低收入国家的视角

Factors Associated with Complicated Appendicitis: View from a Low-middle Income Country.

作者信息

Khan Muhammad Sohaib, Siddiqui Muhammad Tayyab H, Shahzad Noman, Haider Aleezay, Chaudhry Mustafa Belal Hafeez, Alvi Rehman

机构信息

Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, PAK.

General Surgery, East Kent Hospitals University National Health Service Foundation Trust, Margate, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2019 May 28;11(5):e4765. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4765.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.4765
PMID:31363446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6663039/
Abstract

Introduction Factors associated with complicated appendicitis have been inconsistently identified. Moreover, studies are lacking from low and low-middle countries where access to surgical care is limited. Our objective was to identify factors predicting complicated appendicitis as diagnosed intraoperatively in a low-middle income country hospital. Methodology Retrospective case-control study of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from 01/2008 to 12/2015 was completed. Based on intraoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis, patients were divided into two groups; those with complicated appendicitis (CA) and those who had non-complicated appendicitis (NCA). CT scans were further reviewed to identify presence of appendicolith. Result Of the 442 patients included, 88 (20%) patients were in the CA group while 354 (80%) patients were in the NCA group. Patients in the CA group were older [CA vs. NCA: 34.6 ± 14 vs. 30.4 ± 11.5; p-value < 0.001], had symptoms for longer duration [CA vs. NCA: 2 ± 1.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.8; p-value: 0.001] and had a greater proportion of patients with appendicoliths [CA vs. NCA: 37 (42%) vs. 84 (23.7%); p-value: 0.001]. On multivariable regression analysis, patients with complicated appendicitis had greater odds of having appendicoliths (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.4-4.07; p-value < 0.001) and symptoms for a longer duration (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.25-1.97; p-value < 0.001). Conclusion Patients with complicated appendicitis had greater odds of having appendicoliths and symptoms for a longer duration. Further studies are warranted in low and low-middle income countries to gauge the impact delay in presentation and intervention has on appendicitis and its outcomes.

摘要

引言

与复杂性阑尾炎相关的因素一直未得到一致确认。此外,在获得外科治疗机会有限的低收入和中低收入国家,相关研究匮乏。我们的目标是确定在一家中低收入国家医院术中诊断为复杂性阑尾炎的预测因素。方法:完成了一项对2008年1月至2015年12月期间接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者的回顾性病例对照研究。根据术中对复杂性阑尾炎的诊断,将患者分为两组;患有复杂性阑尾炎(CA)的患者和患有非复杂性阑尾炎(NCA)的患者。进一步复查CT扫描以确定阑尾结石的存在。结果:在纳入的442例患者中,88例(20%)患者属于CA组,而354例(80%)患者属于NCA组。CA组患者年龄更大[CA组与NCA组:34.6±14岁对30.4±11.5岁;p值<0.001],症状持续时间更长[CA组与NCA组:2±1.2天对1.5±0.8天;p值:0.001],且阑尾结石患者比例更高[CA组与NCA组:37例(42%)对84例(23.7%);p值:0.001]。多变量回归分析显示,患有复杂性阑尾炎的患者有阑尾结石的几率更高(比值比:2.4,95%置信区间:1.4 - 4.07;p值<0.001)且症状持续时间更长(比值比:1.57,95%置信区间:1.25 - 1.97;p值<0.001)。结论:患有复杂性阑尾炎的患者有阑尾结石的几率更高且症状持续时间更长。在低收入和中低收入国家有必要开展进一步研究,以评估就诊和干预延迟对阑尾炎及其结局的影响。

相似文献

1
Factors Associated with Complicated Appendicitis: View from a Low-middle Income Country.与复杂性阑尾炎相关的因素:来自中低收入国家的视角
Cureus. 2019 May 28;11(5):e4765. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4765.
2
The Characteristics of Appendicoliths Associated with Acute Appendicitis.与急性阑尾炎相关的阑尾结石的特征
Cureus. 2019 Aug 5;11(8):e5322. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5322.
3
Appendicolith appendicitis: should we be operating sooner? A retrospective cohort study.阑尾结石性阑尾炎:我们是否应该更早手术?一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Mar;106(3):237-244. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0055. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
CT of appendicoliths in adult appendicitis: clinical significance and characteristics of overlooked cases.成人阑尾炎中阑尾结石的 CT 表现:漏诊病例的临床意义和特征。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr;34(4):2534-2545. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10273-3. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
5
Prevalence of appendicolith in children with acute appendicitis and its correlation with disease severity.急性阑尾炎患儿阑尾结石的患病率及其与疾病严重程度的相关性。
North Clin Istanb. 2023 Sep 14;10(5):631-635. doi: 10.14744/nci.2022.67984. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.222 家 ACS NSQIP 医院中腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的结局比较。
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
7
Predictive ability of CT findings in the differentiation of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: a retrospective investigation of 201 patients undergone appendectomy at initial admission.CT表现对复杂性和非复杂性阑尾炎鉴别的预测能力:对201例初次入院时接受阑尾切除术患者的回顾性研究
Insights Imaging. 2021 Oct 21;12(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01086-3.
8
Significance of size and location of appendicoliths as exacerbating factor of acute appendicitis.阑尾粪石的大小和位置作为急性阑尾炎加重因素的意义。
Emerg Radiol. 2013 Apr;20(2):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s10140-012-1093-5. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
9
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎的疗效比较。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):927-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822aa8ea.
10
Correlation of Computed Tomography, Pathological Findings, and Clinical Outcomes for Appendicoliths in Appendicitis.阑尾炎中阑尾结石的计算机断层扫描、病理结果及临床结局的相关性
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Apr 18;4(2):e280. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000280. eCollection 2023 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Complicated appendicitis in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中低收入国家的复杂性阑尾炎:系统评价与荟萃分析
ANZ J Surg. 2025 Jun;95(6):1096-1107. doi: 10.1111/ans.70103. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
2
Predictors of complicated appendicitis among patients presented to public referral hospitals in Harari region, Eastern Ethiopia: a case-control study.埃塞俄比亚东部哈拉里地区公立转诊医院患者中复杂性阑尾炎的预测因素:一项病例对照研究
Surg Pract Sci. 2022 Mar 14;9:100072. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100072. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Construction of a clinical prediction model for complicated appendicitis based on machine learning techniques.基于机器学习技术构建复杂阑尾炎的临床预测模型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67453-4.
4
RAMA-WeRA Risk Score in Predicting the Ruptured Appendicitis in Emergency Department; a Multicenter Study for External Validation.用于预测急诊科阑尾炎破裂的RAMA-WeRA风险评分;一项多中心外部验证研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 May 5;12(1):e44. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2237. eCollection 2024.
5
Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings.使用临床和计算机断层扫描结果验证用于预测成人复杂性阑尾炎的评分系统。
Insights Imaging. 2023 Nov 16;14(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01540-4.
6
Factors Contributing to Delays to Accessing Appendectomy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.导致中低收入国家患者接受阑尾切除术延迟的因素:范围综述。
World J Surg. 2023 Dec;47(12):3060-3069. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07183-2. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
7
Appendicolith appendicitis: should we be operating sooner? A retrospective cohort study.阑尾结石性阑尾炎:我们是否应该更早手术?一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Mar;106(3):237-244. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0055. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
8
Characteristics of Patients Presented with Complicated Appendicitis in Adama, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.埃塞俄比亚阿达马地区复杂性阑尾炎患者的特征:一项横断面研究。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 21;14:573-580. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S383550. eCollection 2022.
9
The Impact of Delayed Surgical Care on Patient Outcomes With Alimentary Tract Perforation: Insight From a Low-Middle Income Country.延迟手术治疗对消化道穿孔患者预后的影响:来自低收入和中等收入国家的见解
Cureus. 2022 Aug 2;14(8):e27592. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27592. eCollection 2022 Aug.
10
Predictors and management outcomes of perforated appendicitis in sub-Saharan African countries: A retrospective cohort study.撒哈拉以南非洲国家穿孔性阑尾炎的预测因素及治疗结果:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jul 14;80:104194. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104194. eCollection 2022 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Factors for Perforated Appendicitis in the Acute Care Surgery Era-Minimizing the Patient's Delayed Presentation Factor.急性外科治疗时代的阑尾穿孔风险因素——尽量减少患者的延迟就诊因素。
J Surg Res. 2019 Jun;238:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.031. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
2
High complication rate among patients undergoing appendectomy in Ontario: a population-based retrospective cohort study.安大略省接受阑尾切除术患者的高并发症发生率:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Can J Surg. 2018 Dec 1;61(6):412-417. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011517.
3
Population-based cohort study on the epidemiology of acute appendicitis in children in Sweden in 1987-2013.1987 - 2013年瑞典儿童急性阑尾炎流行病学的基于人群的队列研究。
BJS Open. 2018 Apr 19;2(3):142-150. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.52. eCollection 2018 Jun.
4
Meta-analysis of in-hospital delay before surgery as a risk factor for complications in patients with acute appendicitis.手术前住院时间延迟与急性阑尾炎患者并发症风险的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2018 Jul;105(8):933-945. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10873.
5
Risk of appendicitis in patients with incidentally discovered appendicoliths.偶然发现阑尾结石患者的阑尾炎风险。
J Surg Res. 2018 Jan;221:84-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.08.021. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
6
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of CT Features for Differentiating Complicated and Uncomplicated Appendicitis.系统评价和 CT 特征对鉴别复杂与单纯性阑尾炎的 Meta 分析
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):104-115. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171260. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
7
Predictors of a histopathologic diagnosis of complicated appendicitis.复杂性阑尾炎组织病理学诊断的预测因素。
J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 15;214:197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.051. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
8
The Global Incidence of Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Population-based Studies.全球阑尾炎发病率:基于人群的系统综述研究。
Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):237-241. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002188.
9
Use of Computed Tomography to Determine Perforation in Patients With Acute Appendicitis.使用计算机断层扫描确定急性阑尾炎患者的穿孔情况。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018 Jan-Feb;47(1):6-9. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
10
Variability in mortality following caesarean delivery, appendectomy, and groin hernia repair in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and analysis of published data.低收入和中等收入国家剖宫产、阑尾切除术和腹股沟疝修补术后死亡率的变异性:系统评价和已发表数据分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Mar;4(3):e165-74. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00320-4.