• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阑尾切除术后非计划性再次入院的Meta分析:建立新基准的契机

Meta-analysis of unplanned readmission to hospital post-appendectomy: an opportunity for a new benchmark.

作者信息

Bailey Kate, Choynowski Michelle, Kabir Syed Mohammad Umar, Lawler Jack, Badrin Adibah, Sugrue Michael

机构信息

Donegal Clinical and Research Academy, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, Ireland.

Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, Ireland.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2019 Nov;89(11):1386-1391. doi: 10.1111/ans.15362. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1111/ans.15362
PMID:31364257
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdominal pain requiring surgical intervention. While many studies report readmission, a meta-analysis of readmission post-appendectomy has not been published. This meta-analysis was undertaken to determine rates and predictors of hospital readmission following appendectomy and to potentially provide a metric benchmark.

METHODS

An ethically approved PROSPERO-registered (ID CRD42017069040) meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using databases PubMed and Scopus, was undertaken for studies published between January 2012 and June 2017. Articles relating to outcomes and readmissions after appendectomy were identified. Those scoring >15 for comparative studies and >10 for non-comparative studies, using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were included in the final analysis. The odds ratios (OR) using random-effects, Mantel-Haenszel method with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were computed for each risk factor with RevMan5.

RESULTS

A total of 1757 articles reviewed were reduced to 45 qualifying studies for a final analysis of 836 921 appendectomies. 4.3% (range 0.0-14.4%) of patients were readmitted within 30 days. Significant preoperative patient factors for increased readmission were diabetes mellitus (OR 1.93, CI 1.63-2.28, P < 0.00001), complicated appendicitis (OR 3.6, CI 2.43-5.34, P < 0.00001) and open surgical technique (OR 1.39, CI 1.08-1.79, P < 0.00001). Increased readmission was not associated with gender, obesity or paediatric versus general surgeons or centres.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis identified that readmission is not uncommon post-appendectomy, occurring in one in 25 cases. The mean readmission rate of 4.3% may act as a quality benchmark for improving emergency surgical care. Targeting high-risk groups with diabetes or complicated appendicitis and increasing use of laparoscopic technique may help reduce readmission rates.

摘要

背景

阑尾炎是需要手术干预的急性腹痛的最常见原因。虽然许多研究报告了再入院情况,但尚未发表关于阑尾切除术后再入院的荟萃分析。本荟萃分析旨在确定阑尾切除术后医院再入院率及预测因素,并有可能提供一个衡量基准。

方法

按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,在伦理批准的PROSPERO注册(ID CRD42017069040)的荟萃分析中,使用PubMed和Scopus数据库,对2012年1月至2017年6月发表的研究进行分析。确定与阑尾切除术后结局和再入院相关的文章。根据非随机研究方法学指数标准,比较研究得分>15分、非比较研究得分>10分的文章纳入最终分析。使用RevMan5软件,采用随机效应的Mantel-Haenszel方法计算每个风险因素的比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

共检索到1757篇文章,最终纳入45项合格研究,涉及836921例阑尾切除术。4.3%(范围0.0 - 14.4%)的患者在30天内再次入院。术前导致再入院率增加的显著患者因素包括糖尿病(OR 1.93,CI 1.63 - 2.28,P < 0.00001)、复杂性阑尾炎(OR 3.6,CI 2.43 - 5.34,P < 0.00001)和开放手术技术(OR 1.39,CI 1.08 - 1.79,P < 0.00001)。再入院率增加与性别、肥胖、小儿外科医生与普通外科医生或不同中心无关。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,阑尾切除术后再入院并不罕见,每25例中就有1例发生。4.3%的平均再入院率可作为改善急诊手术护理的质量基准。针对糖尿病或复杂性阑尾炎等高危人群,并增加腹腔镜技术的使用,可能有助于降低再入院率。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of unplanned readmission to hospital post-appendectomy: an opportunity for a new benchmark.阑尾切除术后非计划性再次入院的Meta分析:建立新基准的契机
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Nov;89(11):1386-1391. doi: 10.1111/ans.15362. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Risk factors for serious morbidity, prolonged length of stay and hospital readmission after laparoscopic appendectomy - results from Pol-LA (Polish Laparoscopic Appendectomy) multicenter large cohort study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术(Pol-LA)多中心大样本队列研究:术后严重并发症、住院时间延长和再次住院的风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 15;9(1):14793. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51172-2.
3
A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.对疑似患有急性阑尾炎患者进行腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的荟萃分析。
Can J Surg. 1999 Oct;42(5):377-83.
4
Readmission to hospital following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后再次住院:荟萃分析。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020;52(1):47-55. doi: 10.5114/ait.2020.92967.
5
Facilitating factors in same-day discharge after pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy.小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术后当日出院的促进因素
J Surg Res. 2018 Sep;229:145-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.072. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
6
Pediatric Appendicitis-Factors Associated With Surgical Approach, Complications, and Readmission.小儿阑尾炎-与手术方式、并发症和再入院相关的因素。
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.031. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
7
Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy, risk factors, and costs associated with nationwide readmissions.小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术、危险因素及全国范围内再入院相关费用。
J Surg Res. 2017 Jul;215:245-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
8
Same-day discharge after appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术后当日出院:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jun;36(6):1297-1309. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03872-3. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
9
Association of Same-Day Discharge With Hospital Readmission After Appendectomy in Pediatric Patients.小儿阑尾炎切除术后当日出院与再入院的相关性
JAMA Surg. 2017 Dec 1;152(12):1106-1112. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2221.
10
Is laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for complicated appendicitis ?A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎是否可行?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:187-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Obesity's Effect on Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy Outcomes.小儿肥胖对开放及腹腔镜阑尾切除术结局的影响。
Surg J (N Y). 2024 Oct 24;10(4):e37-e42. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791968. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Adult appendicitis score versus Alvarado score: A comparative study in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.成人阑尾炎评分与阿尔瓦拉多评分:急性阑尾炎诊断的比较研究
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Jul 20;14:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.07.007. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
The Impact of Obesity on Perioperative Outcomes for Children Undergoing Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review.
肥胖对急性阑尾炎行阑尾切除术儿童围手术期结局的影响:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 21;12(14):4811. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144811.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Daytime Versus Nighttime Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children.儿童日间与夜间腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床结局
Children (Basel). 2023 Apr 20;10(4):750. doi: 10.3390/children10040750.
5
Risk factors for postoperative morbidity, prolonged length of stay and hospital readmission after appendectomy for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎切除术后术后发病率、住院时间延长和再入院的风险因素。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1355-1366. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02225-9. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
6
Complicated appendicitis increases the hospital length of stay.复杂性阑尾炎会增加住院时间。
Surg Open Sci. 2022 May 20;9:64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.05.006. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Acute appendicitis-advances and controversies.急性阑尾炎——进展与争议
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Nov 27;13(11):1293-1314. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1293.
8
Quality Outcomes in Appendicitis Care: Identifying Opportunities to Improve Care.阑尾炎护理的质量结果:识别改善护理的机会。
Life (Basel). 2020 Dec 18;10(12):358. doi: 10.3390/life10120358.