Yoon Youngmin, Hwang Taesung, Choi Hojung, Lee Heechun
Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.
College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
J Vet Sci. 2019 Jul;20(4):e44. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2019.20.e44.
This study evaluated the feasibility of using texture analysis and machine learning to distinguish radiographic lung patterns. A total of 1200 regions of interest (ROIs) including four specific lung patterns (normal, alveolar, bronchial, and unstructured interstitial) were obtained from 512 thoracic radiographs of 252 dogs and 65 cats. Forty-four texture parameters based on eight methods of texture analysis (first-order statistics, spatial gray-level-dependence matrices, gray-level-difference statistics, gray-level run length image statistics, neighborhood gray-tone difference matrices, fractal dimension texture analysis, Fourier power spectrum, and Law's texture energy measures) were used to extract textural features from the ROIs. The texture parameters of each lung pattern were compared and used for training and testing of artificial neural networks. Classification performance was evaluated by calculating accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Forty texture parameters showed significant differences between the lung patterns. The accuracy of lung pattern classification was 99.1% in the training dataset and 91.9% in the testing dataset. The AUCs were above 0.98 in the training set and above 0.92 in the testing dataset. Texture analysis and machine learning algorithms may potentially facilitate the evaluation of medical images.
本研究评估了使用纹理分析和机器学习来区分放射学肺部影像模式的可行性。从252只犬和65只猫的512张胸部X光片中获取了总共1200个感兴趣区域(ROI),包括四种特定的肺部影像模式(正常、肺泡、支气管和无结构间质)。基于八种纹理分析方法(一阶统计量、空间灰度依赖矩阵、灰度差统计量、灰度游程长度图像统计量、邻域灰度色调差矩阵、分形维纹理分析、傅里叶功率谱和劳氏纹理能量度量)的44个纹理参数用于从ROI中提取纹理特征。比较了每种肺部影像模式的纹理参数,并将其用于人工神经网络的训练和测试。通过计算准确率和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评估分类性能。40个纹理参数在肺部影像模式之间显示出显著差异。训练数据集中肺部影像模式分类的准确率为99.1%,测试数据集中为91.9%。训练集中的AUC高于0.98,测试数据集中高于0.92。纹理分析和机器学习算法可能有助于医学图像的评估。