• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估人行道和街道上的身体活动:一项横断面研究方案

Assessing Physical Activities Occurring on Sidewalks and Streets: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Suminski Richard Robert, Dominick Gregory, Saponaro Philip

机构信息

Center for Innovative Health Research, Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jul 30;8(7):e12976. doi: 10.2196/12976.

DOI:10.2196/12976
PMID:31364605
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6692107/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A considerable proportion of outdoor physical activity (PA) is done on sidewalks and streets, necessitating the development of a reliable measure of PA performed in these settings. The Block Walk Method (BWM) is one of the more common approaches for this purpose. Although it utilizes reliable observation techniques and displays criterion validity, it remains relatively unchanged since its introduction in 2006. It is a nontechnical, labor-intensive, first generation method. Advancing the BWM would contribute significantly to our understanding of PA behavior.

OBJECTIVE

This study will develop and test a new BWM that utilizes a wearable video device (WVD) and computer video analysis to assess PAs performed on sidewalks and streets. The specific aims are to improve the BWM by incorporating a WVD (eyeglasses with a high-definition video camera in the frame) into the methodology and advance this WVD-enhanced BWM by applying machine learning and recognition software to automatically extract information on PAs occurring on the sidewalks and streets from the videos.

METHODS

Trained observers (1 wearing and 1 not wearing the WVD) will walk together at a set pace along predetermined 1000 ft sidewalk and street observation routes representing low, medium, and high walkable areas. During the walks, the non-WVD observer will use the traditional BWM to record the numbers of individuals standing, sitting, walking, biking, and running in observation fields along the routes. The WVD observer will continuously video the observation fields. Later, 2 investigators will view the videos to determine the number of individuals performing PAs in the observation fields. The video data will then be analyzed automatically using multiple deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to determine the number of humans in the observation fields and the type of PAs performed. Bland Altman methods and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) will be used to assess agreement. Potential sources of error such as occlusions (eg, trees) will be assessed using moderator analyses.

RESULTS

Outcomes from this study are pending; however, preliminary studies supporting the research protocol indicate that the BWM is reliable for determining the PA mode (Cramer V=.89; P<.001), the address where the PA occurred (Cohen kappa=.85; P<.001), and the number engaged in an observed PA (ICC=.85; P<.001). The number of individuals seen walking along routes was correlated with several environmental characteristics such as sidewalk quality (r=.39; P=.02) and neighborhood aesthetics (r=.49; P<.001). Furthermore, we have used CNNs to detect cars, bikes, and pedestrians as well as individuals using park facilities.

CONCLUSIONS

We expect the new approach will enhance measurement accuracy while reducing the burden of data collection. In the future, the capabilities of the WVD-CNN system will be expanded to allow for the determination of other characteristics captured in videos such as caloric expenditure and environmental conditions.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/12976.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab07/6692107/6c3967ca3c41/resprot_v8i7e12976_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab07/6692107/d616d426ef4f/resprot_v8i7e12976_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab07/6692107/e266ea64a1aa/resprot_v8i7e12976_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab07/6692107/e933321894e1/resprot_v8i7e12976_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab07/6692107/6c3967ca3c41/resprot_v8i7e12976_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab07/6692107/d616d426ef4f/resprot_v8i7e12976_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab07/6692107/e266ea64a1aa/resprot_v8i7e12976_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab07/6692107/e933321894e1/resprot_v8i7e12976_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab07/6692107/6c3967ca3c41/resprot_v8i7e12976_fig4.jpg
摘要

背景

相当一部分户外体育活动是在人行道和街道上进行的,因此需要开发一种可靠的方法来测量在这些环境中进行的体育活动。街区步行法(BWM)是为此目的较为常用的方法之一。尽管它采用了可靠的观察技术并显示出标准效度,但自2006年引入以来相对没有变化。它是一种非技术性、劳动密集型的第一代方法。改进BWM将极大地有助于我们对体育活动行为的理解。

目的

本研究将开发并测试一种新的BWM,该方法利用可穿戴视频设备(WVD)和计算机视频分析来评估在人行道和街道上进行的体育活动。具体目标是通过将WVD(镜架中带有高清摄像机的眼镜)纳入方法中来改进BWM,并通过应用机器学习和识别软件从视频中自动提取人行道和街道上发生的体育活动信息,从而推进这种WVD增强的BWM。

方法

训练有素的观察者(1名佩戴WVD,1名不佩戴WVD)将以设定的步伐一起沿着代表低、中、高可步行区域的预定1000英尺人行道和街道观察路线行走。在行走过程中,不佩戴WVD的观察者将使用传统的BWM记录沿途观察区域内站立、坐着、行走、骑自行车和跑步的人数。佩戴WVD的观察者将持续拍摄观察区域。之后,两名研究人员将查看视频以确定观察区域内进行体育活动的人数。然后将使用多个深度卷积神经网络(CNN)自动分析视频数据,以确定观察区域内的人数以及进行的体育活动类型。将使用布兰德-奥特曼方法和组内相关系数(ICC)来评估一致性。将使用调节分析评估遮挡(如树木)等潜在误差来源。

结果

本研究的结果尚未得出;然而,支持该研究方案的初步研究表明,BWM在确定体育活动模式(克莱默V = 0.89;P <.001)、体育活动发生的地点(科恩kappa = 0.85;P <.001)以及参与观察到的体育活动的人数(ICC = 0.85;P <.001)方面是可靠的。沿途看到的行走人数与一些环境特征相关,如人行道质量(r = 0.39;P = 0.02)和社区美观程度(r = 0.49;P <.001)。此外,我们已经使用CNN来检测汽车、自行车和行人以及使用公园设施的个人。

结论

我们预计新方法将提高测量准确性,同时减轻数据收集负担。未来,WVD-CNN系统的功能将得到扩展,以允许确定视频中捕获的其他特征,如热量消耗和环境条件。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):PRR1-10.2196/12976

相似文献

1
Assessing Physical Activities Occurring on Sidewalks and Streets: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study.评估人行道和街道上的身体活动:一项横断面研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jul 30;8(7):e12976. doi: 10.2196/12976.
2
Validation of the Block Walk Method for Assessing Physical Activity occurring on Sidewalks/Streets.验证用于评估人行道/街道上发生的身体活动的街区行走法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 31;16(11):1927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111927.
3
A comprehensive evaluation of physical activity on sidewalks and streets in three U.S. Cities.对美国三个城市人行道和街道上的体育活动的综合评估。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jan 19;26:101696. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101696. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
A method for observing physical activity on residential sidewalks and streets.一种观察住宅人行道和街道上身体活动的方法。
J Urban Health. 2006 May;83(3):434-43. doi: 10.1007/s11524-005-9017-2.
5
Observing physical activity in suburbs.观察郊区的体育活动。
Health Place. 2008 Dec;14(4):894-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.12.004. Epub 2008 Jan 6.
6
Usability and Accuracy of a Smartwatch for the Assessment of Physical Activity in the Elderly Population: Observational Study.智能手表评估老年人身体活动的可用性和准确性:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 5;9(5):e20966. doi: 10.2196/20966.
7
Assessing Park Quality with a Wearable Video Device and an Unmanned Aerial System.使用可穿戴视频设备和无人机系统评估公园质量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;19(18):11717. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811717.
8
Characteristics of urban sidewalks/streets and objectively measured physical activity.城市人行道/街道的特征与客观测量的身体活动
J Urban Health. 2008 Mar;85(2):178-90. doi: 10.1007/s11524-007-9251-x. Epub 2007 Dec 27.
9
Measuring Neighborhood Walkable Environments: A Comparison of Three Approaches.衡量邻里适宜步行的环境:三种方法的比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 3;14(6):593. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060593.
10
Assessing Physical Activity in Temporary Spaces: Application of SOPARC / iSOPARC® for Play Streets.评估临时空间中的身体活动:SOPARC / iSOPARC®在游乐街上的应用。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2020 Jun;91(2):346-353. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1656793. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating the Health Effects of Adding Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths at the Census Tract Level: Multiple Model Comparison.在普查区层面评估新增自行车道和人行道对健康的影响:多模型比较
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Aug 24;8(8):e37379. doi: 10.2196/37379.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in Behavior, Time, Location, and Built Environment between Objectively Measured Utilitarian and Recreational Walking.客观测量的功利性步行与休闲性步行在行为、时间、地点和建成环境方面的差异。
Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2017 Dec;57:185-194. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.09.026. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
2
Automated Ecological Assessment of Physical Activity: Advancing Direct Observation.自动生态活动评估:推进直接观察。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 1;14(12):1487. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121487.
3
Neighbourhood built environment characteristics associated with different types of physical activity in Canadian adults.
与加拿大成年人不同类型身体活动相关的邻里建成环境特征。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2017 Jun;37(6):175-185. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.37.6.01.
4
Context Matters: Systematic Observation of Place-Based Physical Activity.背景很重要:基于场所的体育活动的系统观察
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016 Dec;87(4):334-341. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2016.1234302. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
5
The effect of changing the built environment on physical activity: a quantitative review of the risk of bias in natural experiments.改变建成环境对身体活动的影响:自然实验中偏倚风险的定量综述。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 7;13(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0433-3.
6
Assessing physical activity intensity by video analysis.通过视频分析评估身体活动强度。
Physiol Meas. 2015 May;36(5):1037-46. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/36/5/1037. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
7
Co-benefits of designing communities for active living: an exploration of literature.为积极生活设计社区的协同效益:文献综述
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Feb 28;12:30. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0188-2.
8
Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions.通过自我报告评估身体活动:现状、局限性及未来方向。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000 Jun;71 Suppl 2:1-14. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2000.11082780.
9
Inadequate physical activity and health care expenditures in the United States.美国体育活动不足与医疗保健支出情况
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;57(4):315-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
10
How far from home? The locations of physical activity in an urban U.S. setting.离家多远?美国城市环境中身体活动的地点。
Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69:181-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.034. Epub 2014 Oct 5.