The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Regulatory Science, Tokyo, Japan.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jan;60(1):117-124. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1501. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
The basic components of regulatory and supporting policies for orphan drug development appear similar between the United States and Japan, but drugs designated as orphan drugs have been different between the 2 countries. The probabilities of development success (ie, marketing approval) in designated orphan drugs have also been significantly different. In this study, we analyzed recent outcomes of development for orphan drugs designated from 1993 to 2017 in Japan, considering their development and approval status in the United States. Our analysis showed that success for orphan drug development in Japan was apparently associated with prior approval status in the United States. Company size, orphan development experience, and patient enrichment were also positively associated with successful marketing approval. Although similar designations and priority review systems for orphan drugs have been enacted, economic incentives and regulatory conditions provided by the systems seem to be different between the 2 countries, which may lead to varied performance in orphan designation and approval. We need to pay close attention to the impact of industrial global development strategies when comparing the outcomes and performance of different orphan drug promotion systems.
监管和支持孤儿药开发的政策的基本组成部分在美国和日本之间似乎相似,但两国指定的孤儿药有所不同。指定的孤儿药的开发成功率(即营销批准)也有显著差异。在这项研究中,我们分析了 1993 年至 2017 年在日本指定的孤儿药的最新开发结果,同时考虑了它们在美国的开发和批准状况。我们的分析表明,日本孤儿药开发的成功显然与美国的先前批准状况有关。公司规模、孤儿药开发经验和患者富集也与成功的营销批准呈正相关。尽管已经制定了类似的孤儿药指定和优先审查制度,但这两个国家的制度提供的经济激励和监管条件似乎不同,这可能导致孤儿药指定和批准的表现不同。在比较不同孤儿药推广制度的结果和绩效时,我们需要密切关注产业全球发展战略的影响。