Giannuzzi Viviana, Landi Annalisa, Bosone Enrico, Giannuzzi Floriana, Nicotri Stefano, Torrent-Farnell Josep, Bonifazi Fedele, Felisi Mariagrazia, Bonifazi Donato, Ceci Adriana
Fondazione per la Ricerca Farmacologica Gianni Benzi onlus, Valenzano, Italy.
Società Italiana Attività Regolatorie (SIAR), Pavia, UK.
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 11;7(9):e017358. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017358.
The research and development process in the field of rare diseases is characterised by many well-known difficulties, and a large percentage of orphan medicinal products do not reach the marketing approval.This work aims at identifying orphan medicinal products that failed the developmental process and investigating reasons for and possible factors influencing failures.
Drugs designated in Europe under Regulation (European Commission) 141/2000 in the period 2000-2012 were investigated in terms of the following failures: (1) marketing authorisation failures (refused or withdrawn) and (2) drugs abandoned by sponsors during development.Possible risk factors for failure were analysed using statistically validated methods.
This study points out that 437 out of 788 designations are still under development, while 219 failed the developmental process. Among the latter, 34 failed the marketing authorisation process and 185 were abandoned during the developmental process. In the first group of drugs (marketing authorisation failures), 50% reached phase II, 47% reached phase III and 3% reached phase I, while in the second group (abandoned drugs), the majority of orphan medicinal products apparently never started the development process, since no data on 48.1% of them were published and the 3.2% did not progress beyond the non-clinical stage.The reasons for failures of marketing authorisation were: efficacy/safety issues (26), insufficient data (12), quality issues (7), regulatory issues on trials (4) and commercial reasons (1). The main causes for abandoned drugs were efficacy/safety issues (reported in 54 cases), inactive companies (25.4%), change of company strategy (8.1%) and drug competition (10.8%). No information concerning reasons for failure was available for 23.2% of the analysed products.
This analysis shows that failures occurred in 27.8% of all designations granted in Europe, the main reasons being safety and efficacy issues. Moreover, the stage of development reached by drugs represents a specific risk factor for failures.
罕见病领域的研发过程存在诸多众所周知的困难,很大比例的孤儿药品未能获得上市批准。本研究旨在识别研发过程失败的孤儿药品,并调查失败原因及可能影响失败的因素。
对2000年至2012年期间根据(欧盟委员会)第141/2000号法规在欧洲指定的药物,就以下失败情况进行调查:(1)上市许可失败(被拒绝或撤回);(2)申办方在研发过程中放弃的药物。使用经统计学验证的方法分析失败的可能风险因素。
本研究指出,788个指定药物中437个仍在研发中,219个研发过程失败。在后者中,34个未通过上市许可程序,185个在研发过程中被放弃。在第一组药物(上市许可失败)中,50%进入了II期,47%进入了III期,3%进入了I期;而在第二组(被放弃的药物)中,大多数孤儿药品显然从未开始研发过程,因为48.1%的药物没有公布数据,3.2%未超过非临床阶段。上市许可失败的原因有:疗效/安全性问题(26个)、数据不足(12个)、质量问题(7个)、试验监管问题(4个)和商业原因(1个)。被放弃药物的主要原因是疗效/安全性问题(报告了54例)、公司不活跃(25.4%)、公司战略改变(8.1%)和药物竞争(10.8%)。23.2%的分析产品没有关于失败原因的信息。
该分析表明,在欧洲授予的所有指定药物中,27.8%出现了失败,主要原因是安全性和疗效问题。此外,药物所达到的研发阶段是失败的一个特定风险因素。