Department of Conservative Dentistry, Centre of Dentistry, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0219714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219714. eCollection 2019.
OBJECTIVES: To elicit patterns in pathogenic biofilm composition we characterized the oral microbiome present in patients with dentin caries in comparison to healthy subjects. METHODS: 16S amplicon sequencing was used to analyse a total of 56 patients; 19 samples of carious dentin (pooled from at least three teeth) and 37 supragingival samples (pooled from three healthy tooth surfaces). Oral and periodontal status and socio-demographic parameters were recorded. Group assignment, smoking and further socio-demographic parameters were used as explanatory variables in the microbiome composition analysis. RESULTS: Overall, a total of 4,110,020 DNA high-quality sequences were yielded. Using a threshold of similarity >97% for assigning operational taxonomic units (OTU), a total of 1,537 OTUs were identified. PERMANOVA showed significant differences in microbiome composition between the groups caries/healthy (p = 0.001), smoking/non-smoking (p = 0.007) and fluoride intake during childhood yes/no (tablets p = 0.003, salt p = 0.023). The healthy microbiome had a significantly higher diversity (alpha diversity, p<0.001) and a lower dominance (Berger-Parker index, p<0.001). It was dominated by Fusobacteria. A linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) yielded a set of 39 OTUs being more abundant in carious dentin samples, including Atopobium spp. (14.9 log2FoldChange), Lactobacillus casei (11.6), Acinetobacter spp. (10.8), Lactobacillus gasseri (10.6), Parascardovia denticolens (10.5), Olsenella profusa (10.4), and others. Also Propionibacterium acidifaciens (7.2) and Streptococcus mutans (5.2) were overabundant in caries lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The healthy microbiome was highly diverse. The advanced caries microbiome was dominated by a set of carious associated bacteria where S. mutans played only a minor role. Smoking and fluoride intake during childhood influenced the microbiome composition significantly. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The presented investigation adds knowledge to the still not fully comprehended patterns of oral microbiomes in caries compared with oral health. By analysing the genetics of biofilm samples from oral health and severe tooth decay we found distinct discriminating species which could be targets for future therapeutic approaches.
目的:为了揭示致病因的生物膜组成模式,我们对牙本质龋患者的口腔微生物组进行了研究,并与健康受试者进行了比较。
方法:采用 16S 扩增子测序技术对 56 名患者进行了分析,其中 19 份龋坏牙本质样本(来自至少 3 颗牙齿的混合样本)和 37 份龈上样本(来自 3 颗健康牙面的混合样本)。记录口腔和牙周状况以及社会人口统计学参数。将分组、吸烟和其他社会人口统计学参数用作微生物组组成分析的解释变量。
结果:总共产生了 4110020 个高质量 DNA 序列。使用相似性阈值>97%(OTU 分配),共鉴定出 1537 个 OTU。PERMANOVA 显示组间(龋病/健康)(p=0.001)、吸烟/非吸烟(p=0.007)和儿童期氟化物摄入(片剂 p=0.003,盐 p=0.023)的微生物组组成存在显著差异。健康微生物组的多样性显著更高(alpha 多样性,p<0.001),优势度更低(Berger-Parker 指数,p<0.001)。它主要由梭杆菌门组成。线性判别分析效应大小(LEfSe)产生了一组在龋坏牙本质样本中更丰富的 39 个 OTU,包括 Atopobium spp.(14.9 log2FoldChange)、乳杆菌属(Lactobacillus casei)(11.6)、不动杆菌属(Acinetobacter spp.)(10.8)、乳杆菌属(Lactobacillus gasseri)(10.6)、Parascardovia denticolens(10.5)、奥尔森菌属(Olsenella profusa)(10.4)等。同样,丙酸杆菌属(Propionibacterium acidifaciens)(7.2)和变异链球菌(Streptococcus mutans)(5.2)在龋病病变中也过度丰富。
结论:健康微生物组高度多样化。进展性龋病微生物组主要由一组与龋病相关的细菌组成,其中变形链球菌仅起次要作用。吸烟和儿童期氟化物摄入对微生物组组成有显著影响。
临床意义:本研究增加了对口腔健康与严重牙釉质龋相比,口腔微生物组模式尚未完全理解的认识。通过分析口腔健康和严重牙釉质龋的生物膜样本的遗传学,我们发现了一些具有区分能力的物种,这些物种可能是未来治疗方法的靶点。
Infect Immun. 2017-7-19
Caries Res. 2012-11-9
BMC Oral Health. 2024-7-31
Biomedicines. 2025-2-26
J Bacteriol. 2024-2-22
Evol Hum Sci. 2023-5-22
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019-1-4
Arch Oral Biol. 2018-2-20
Adv Dent Res. 2018-2
J Dent Res. 2017-12-1