Yang Xiaoxia, He Lidan, Yan Siqi, Chen Xinyi, Que Guoying
Stomatological Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510280, China.
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jun 25;21(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01683-0.
Supragingival plaque and saliva are commonly used for microbiome analysis. Many epidemiological studies have identified deciduous teeth caries as a risk factor for caries development in first permanent molar (FPM); nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on the effects of deciduous teeth caries on the microbiome of healthy FPM. Additionally, it remains unclear whether saliva can be used instead of supragingival plaque for caries microbial studies. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate this issue, and to characterize and compare the oral microbiome of healthy FPMs in children with different caries statuses and that from children with and without caries in a similar microhabitat, by PacBio sequencing. Currently, few studies have investigated the oral microbiome of children using this technique.
Thirty children (aged 7-9 years) with mixed dentition were enrolled; 15 had dental caries, and 15 did not. Supragingival plaques of deciduous molars and maxillary FPMs, and non-stimulating saliva samples were collected. DNA was extracted and the v1-v9 regions of 16S rRNA were amplified. Subsequently, PacBio sequencing and bioinformatic analyses were performed for microbiome identification.
The microbial alpha diversity of the saliva samples was lower than that of the supragingival plaque (p < 0.05); however, no differences were detected between deciduous teeth and FPMs (p > 0.05). In addition, the alpha and beta diversity of children with and without caries was also similar (p > 0.05). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling and Adonis analyses indicated that the microbial structure of salivary and supragingival plaque samples differ (p < 0.05). Further analysis of deciduous teeth plaque showed that Streptococcus mutans, Propionibacterium acidifaciens, and Veillonella dispar were more abundant in children with caries than in those without (p < 0.05); while in FPMs plaque, Selenomonas noxia was more abundant in healthy children (p < 0.05). No differences in microorganisms abundance were found in the saliva subgroups (p > 0.05).
We have determined that supragingival plaque was the best candidate for studying carious microbiome. Furthermore, S. mutans, V. dispar, and P. acidifaciens were highly associated with deciduous teeth caries. S. noxia may be associated with the abiding health of FPM; however, this requires additional studies.
龈上菌斑和唾液常用于微生物组分析。许多流行病学研究已将乳牙龋齿确定为第一恒磨牙(FPM)龋齿发展的危险因素;然而,据我们所知,尚无关于乳牙龋齿对健康FPM微生物组影响的报道。此外,唾液是否可替代龈上菌斑用于龋齿微生物研究仍不清楚。因此,我们旨在通过PacBio测序阐明这一问题,并对不同龋齿状态儿童的健康FPM口腔微生物组以及相似微生境中有龋和无龋儿童的口腔微生物组进行表征和比较。目前,很少有研究使用该技术调查儿童口腔微生物组。
纳入30名(7 - 9岁)混合牙列儿童;15名有龋齿,15名无龋齿。收集乳牙磨牙和上颌FPM的龈上菌斑以及非刺激性唾液样本。提取DNA并扩增16S rRNA的v1 - v9区域。随后,进行PacBio测序和生物信息学分析以鉴定微生物组。
唾液样本的微生物α多样性低于龈上菌斑(p < 0.05);然而,乳牙和FPM之间未检测到差异(p > 0.05)。此外,有龋和无龋儿童的α和β多样性也相似(p > 0.05)。非度量多维尺度分析和Adonis分析表明,唾液和龈上菌斑样本的微生物结构不同(p < 0.05)。对乳牙菌斑的进一步分析表明,变形链球菌、嗜酸丙酸杆菌和殊异韦荣菌在有龋儿童中比无龋儿童中更丰富(p < 0.05);而在FPM菌斑中,有害月形单胞菌在健康儿童中更丰富(p < 0.05)。唾液亚组中微生物丰度未发现差异(p > 0.05)。
我们已确定龈上菌斑是研究龋齿微生物组的最佳样本。此外,变形链球菌、殊异韦荣菌和嗜酸丙酸杆菌与乳牙龋齿高度相关。有害月形单胞菌可能与FPM的持久健康有关;然而,这需要进一步研究。