• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习驾驶:住院医师对主治医生如何促进和破坏自主权的看法。

Learning to drive: resident physicians' perceptions of how attending physicians promote and undermine autonomy.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Saint Louis Children's Hospital, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

Pediatric Epilepsy Team, Regional Neurology Services, Department of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1732-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-019-1732-6
PMID:31366383
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6670234/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Providing appropriate levels of autonomy to resident physicians is an important facet of graduate medical education, allowing learners to progress toward the ultimate goal of independent practice. While studies have identified the importance of autonomy to the development of resident physicians, less is known about resident perspectives on their "lived experiences" with autonomy and ways in which clinical educators either promote or undermine it. The current study aims to provide an empirically based practical framework based on resident perspectives through which supervising physicians can attempt to more adequately foster resident physician autonomy.

METHODS

Residents completed open ended surveys followed by facilitated group discussions of their perspectives on autonomy. Qualitative thematic analysis identified key themes in resident definitions of autonomy and how clinical educators either promote or undermine resident autonomy during supervision. Fifty-nine resident physicians representing six different specialties from two institutions participated.

RESULTS

Learners felt that autonomy was critical to their development as independent physicians. Leading the approach to care, a sense of ownership for patients, and receiving appropriate levels of supervision were identified as key components of autonomy. Attending physicians who promoted this active involvement with patient care were felt to have a strong positive influence on resident autonomy. Autonomy was undermined when decisions were micromanaged and resident input in decision-making process was minimized.

CONCLUSIONS

Fostering autonomy is a critical aspect of medical education. Allowing residents to take the lead in the delivery of patient care while supporting them as important members of the health care team can help to promote resident autonomy in the clinical setting.

摘要

背景

为住院医师提供适当程度的自主权是住院医师规范化培训的一个重要方面,使学习者能够朝着独立实践的最终目标迈进。虽然研究已经确定了自主权对住院医师发展的重要性,但对于住院医师对自主权的“实际体验”以及临床教育者促进或破坏自主权的方式知之甚少。本研究旨在通过住院医师的观点提供一个基于经验的实用框架,以便监督医生能够尝试更充分地培养住院医师的自主权。

方法

住院医师完成开放式调查,然后对他们对自主权的看法进行小组讨论。定性主题分析确定了住院医师对自主权的定义中的关键主题,以及临床教育者在监督过程中如何促进或破坏住院医师的自主权。来自两个机构的六个不同专业的 59 名住院医师参与了这项研究。

结果

学习者认为自主权对他们作为独立医生的发展至关重要。主导治疗方法、对患者的所有权感以及获得适当水平的监督被确定为自主权的关键组成部分。提倡这种积极参与患者护理的主治医生被认为对住院医师的自主权产生了强烈的积极影响。当决策被微观管理且决策过程中对住院医师的意见最小化时,自主权就会受到破坏。

结论

培养自主权是医学教育的一个关键方面。允许住院医师在提供患者护理方面发挥主导作用,同时支持他们作为医疗团队的重要成员,可以帮助促进临床环境中的住院医师自主权。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4c/6670234/64f68893e3ab/12909_2019_1732_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4c/6670234/64f68893e3ab/12909_2019_1732_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e4c/6670234/64f68893e3ab/12909_2019_1732_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning to drive: resident physicians' perceptions of how attending physicians promote and undermine autonomy.学习驾驶:住院医师对主治医生如何促进和破坏自主权的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1732-6.
2
Quantification of Resident Work in Colorectal Surgery.结直肠外科住院医师工作量化。
J Surg Educ. 2018 May-Jun;75(3):564-572. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
3
Commentary: watching closely at a distance: key tensions in supervising resident physicians.述评:远距离密切观察:监督住院医师的关键紧张因素。
Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1399-400. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eb4fa4.
4
Intensive Care Unit Educators: A Multicenter Evaluation of Behaviors Residents Value in Attending Physicians.重症监护病房教育工作者:对住院医师重视的主治医师行为的多中心评估
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Apr;14(4):513-516. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-996BC.
5
Interprofessional Collaboration: A Qualitative Study of Non-Physician Perspectives on Resident Competency.跨专业协作:非医师视角下对住院医师能力的定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):487-492. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4238-0. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
6
Understanding Resident Performance, Mindfulness, and Communication in Critical Care Rotations.了解重症监护轮转中的住院医师表现、正念和沟通能力。
J Surg Educ. 2017 May-Jun;74(3):503-512. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
7
Having a Voice: Resident Perceptions of Supervision, Decision-Making and Patient Care Ownership.有发言权:住院医师对监督、决策和患者护理所有权的看法。
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Apr;24(3):519-526. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.10.012. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
8
Entrustment of general surgery residents in the operating room: factors contributing to provision of resident autonomy.外科住院医师在手术室的委托:促进住院医师自主性的因素。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Oct;219(4):778-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
9
Characterizing the Relationship Between Surgical Resident and Faculty Perceptions of Autonomy in the Operating Room.描述外科住院医师与教员对手术室自主权认知之间的关系。
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):e31-e38. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.021. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
10
How do Perceptions of Autonomy Differ in General Surgery Training Between Faculty, Senior Residents, Hospital Administrators, and the General Public? A Multi-Institutional Study.在普通外科培训中,教员、高级住院医师、医院管理人员和普通公众对自主性的认知有何不同?一项多机构研究。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):e193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
How We Built Workplace Based Assessment-for-Learning in Irish GP Training.我们如何在爱尔兰全科医生培训中构建基于工作场所的学习评估。
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Jul 22;14(1):411-422. doi: 10.5334/pme.1428. eCollection 2025.
2
Failing Safely: Autonomy and Identity Formation in Medical Training.安全失败:医学培训中的自主性与身份形成
ATS Sch. 2025 Mar;6(1):8-12. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0081VL. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
3
A Behavioral Analysis of Factors That Influence Antibiotic Prescribing in Hospitals: A Metasynthesis of Reviews.

本文引用的文献

1
Entrustability Scales: Outlining Their Usefulness for Competency-Based Clinical Assessment.可托付性量表:概述其在基于胜任力的临床评估中的实用性。
Acad Med. 2016 Feb;91(2):186-90. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001045.
2
Entrustment Decision Making in Clinical Training.临床培训中的委托决策制定
Acad Med. 2016 Feb;91(2):191-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001044.
3
How clinical supervisors develop trust in their trainees: a qualitative study.临床督导如何培养对其学员的信任:一项定性研究。
医院抗生素处方影响因素的行为分析:综述的元综合分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Dec 17;12(1):ofae728. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae728. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Towards Safer Spaces: An Empirical Investigation of Trainee Psychological Safety Within Academic Medical Centers.迈向更安全的空间:学术医疗中心内实习医生心理安全感的实证研究
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Nov 8;15:1079-1092. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S477654. eCollection 2024.
5
Scoping review: exploring residents' views of supervisor entrustment and its effect on learning and professional development.范围综述:探究住院医师对上级医师委托的看法及其对学习和职业发展的影响。
Korean J Med Educ. 2024 Mar;36(1):81-98. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2024.286. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
6
Resident Assessment of Clinician Educators According to Core ACGME Competencies.根据核心 ACGME 能力对临床教师的住院医师评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(3):377-384. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08496-7. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
7
Trainee Ethics in Interventional Radiology.介入放射学中的实习伦理
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2023 Nov 2;40(5):472-474. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772816. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Association between independent practice time and patient outcomes in the emergency department: a retrospective study of residents in three urban hospitals in Taiwan.独立实践时间与急诊科患者结局的关联:台湾三家城市医院住院医师的回顾性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 7;23(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00877-9.
9
Micromanagement in clinical supervision: a scoping review.临床督导中的微观管理:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):563. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04543-3.
10
Micromanagement During Clinical Supervision: Solutions to the Challenges.临床督导中的微观管理:挑战应对之策
Cureus. 2022 Mar 26;14(3):e23523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23523. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Med Educ. 2015 Aug;49(8):783-95. doi: 10.1111/medu.12745.
4
Using self-determination theory to improve residency training: learning to make omelets without breaking eggs.运用自我决定理论改进住院医师培训:学会不打破鸡蛋就能做出煎蛋卷。
Acad Med. 2015 Apr;90(4):408-10. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000523.
5
Discordance between resident and faculty perceptions of resident autonomy: can self-determination theory help interpret differences and guide strategies for bridging the divide?住院医师与教员对住院医师自主性认知的不一致:自我决定理论能否有助于解释差异并指导弥合分歧的策略?
Acad Med. 2015 Apr;90(4):462-71. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000522.
6
Graded autonomy in medical education--managing things that go bump in the night.医学教育中的分级自主性——应对夜间突发状况
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 20;370(12):1086-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1315408.
7
Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities.可托付专业活动的基本要素。
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Mar;5(1):157-8. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00380.1.
8
24/7 attendings: "helicoptering" the housestaff?全天候值班的主治医生:对住院医师进行“直升机式管理”?
Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):131-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3493. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
9
Resident perceptions of autonomy in a complex tertiary care environment improve when supervised by hospitalists.在复杂的三级医疗环境中,当由住院医师负责监督时,住院医生对自主性的认知会得到改善。
Hosp Pediatr. 2012 Oct;2(4):228-34. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2011-0012-2.
10
Establishing entrustment of residents and autonomy.确立居民的委托和自主权。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;20(9):947-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12201. Epub 2013 Aug 24.