Evolution and Ecology Program, International Institute of Applied System Analysis, Schlossplatz 1, A-2361, Laxenburg, Austria.
Parmenides Center for the Conceptual Foundations of Science, Parmenides Foundation, Kirchplatz 1, D-82049, Pullach, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 31;9(1):11149. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47497-7.
The ecological consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation have been intensively studied on a broad, landscape-wide scale, but have less been investigated on the finer scale of individual habitat patches, especially when considering dynamic turnovers in the habitability of sites. We study changes to individual patches from the perspective of the inhabitant organisms requiring a minimum area for survival. With patches given by contiguous assemblages of discrete habitat sites, the removal of a single site necessarily causes one of the following three elementary local events in the affected patch: splitting into two or more pieces, shrinkage without splitting, or complete disappearance. We investigate the probabilities of these events and the effective size of the habitat removed by them from the population's living area as the habitat landscape gradually transitions from pristine to totally destroyed. On this basis, we report the following findings. First, we distinguish four transitions delimiting five main phases of landscape degradation: (1) when there is only a little habitat loss, the most frequent event is the shrinkage of the spanning patch; (2) with more habitat loss, splitting becomes significant; (3) splitting peaks; (4) the remaining patches shrink; and (5) finally, they gradually disappear. Second, organisms that require large patches are especially sensitive to phase 3. This phase emerges at a value of habitat loss that is well above the percolation threshold. Third, the effective habitat loss caused by the removal of a single habitat site can be several times higher than the actual habitat loss. For organisms requiring only small patches, this amplification of losses is highest during phase 4 of the landscape degradation, whereas for organisms requiring large patches, it peaks during phase 3.
生境丧失和破碎化的生态后果在广泛的景观尺度上得到了深入研究,但在较小的单个生境斑块尺度上研究较少,特别是在考虑到栖息地可居住性的动态变化时。我们从需要最小生存面积的栖息生物的角度研究单个斑块的变化。对于由离散栖息地站点连续组合而成的斑块,单个站点的移除必然会导致受影响斑块中的以下三种基本局部事件之一:分裂成两个或多个部分、不分裂而收缩或完全消失。我们研究了这些事件的概率以及它们从种群的生存区域中移除的栖息地的有效大小,因为栖息地景观逐渐从原始状态过渡到完全破坏。在此基础上,我们报告了以下发现。首先,我们区分了四个过渡,划定了景观退化的五个主要阶段:(1)当栖息地损失很小的时候,最常见的事件是跨越斑块的收缩;(2)随着栖息地的损失增加,分裂变得显著;(3)分裂达到峰值;(4)剩余的斑块收缩;(5)最后,它们逐渐消失。其次,需要大面积栖息地的生物对第 3 阶段特别敏感。这个阶段出现在栖息地损失值远高于渗流阈值的时候。第三,单个栖息地站点移除所导致的有效栖息地损失可能是实际栖息地损失的数倍。对于仅需要小斑块的生物来说,这种损失的放大在景观退化的第 4 阶段最高,而对于需要大斑块的生物来说,在第 3 阶段达到峰值。