• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国年轻临床医生对于使用共同决策工具来传达心血管风险的偏好和态度。

Preferences and attitudes of young Chinese clinicians about using a shared decision making tools for communicating cardiovascular risk.

作者信息

Huang Rong-Chong, Song Xian-Tao, Zhang Dong-Feng, Xu Jia-Ying, Boehmer Kasey R, Leppin Aaron A, Gionfriddo Michael R, Ting Henry H, Montori Victor M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning 116011, China.

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China.

出版信息

Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2019 Jun 17;5(2):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2019.05.001. eCollection 2019 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.cdtm.2019.05.001
PMID:31367699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6656904/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses the attitudes and preferences of Chinese clinicians toward their involvement in shared decision making (SDM).

METHODS

From May 2014 to May 2015, 200 Chinese clinicians from two hospitals were enrolled to complete a survey on their attitude towards SDM. We conducted the survey via face-to-face interviews before and after an educational intervention on SDM among young Chinese clinicians. The clinicians were asked to give the extent of agreement to SDM. They also gave the extent of difficulty in using decision aids (DAs) during the SDM process. The variation in the range of responses to each question before and after the SDM intervention was recorded. The frequency of changed responses was analyzed by using JMP 6.0 software. Data were statistically analyzed using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, as appropriate to the data type. Multiple logistic regressions were used to test for those factors significantly and independently associated with preference for an approach for each scenario.

RESULTS

Of the 200 young Chinese clinicians sampled, 59.0% indicated a preference for SDM and a desire to participate in SDM before receiving education or seeing the DA, and this number increased to 69.0% after seeing the DA with the sample video of the SDM process on Statin Choice. However, 28.5% of the respondents still reported that, in their current practice, they make clinical decisions on behalf of their patients. The clinicians who denied a desire to use the DA stated that the main barriers to implement SDM or DA use in China are lack of time and knowledge of SDM.

CONCLUSIONS

Most young Chinese clinicians want to participate in SDM. However, they state the main barriers to perform SDM are lack of experience and time. The educational intervention about SDM that exposes clinicians to DAs was found to increase their receptivity.

摘要

目的

本研究评估中国临床医生对于参与共同决策(SDM)的态度和偏好。

方法

2014年5月至2015年5月,招募了来自两家医院的200名中国临床医生,以完成一项关于他们对SDM态度的调查。我们在对中国年轻临床医生进行SDM教育干预前后,通过面对面访谈的方式进行了调查。要求临床医生对SDM表示同意的程度。他们还给出了在SDM过程中使用决策辅助工具(DAs)的困难程度。记录了SDM干预前后每个问题回答范围的变化。使用JMP 6.0软件分析回答变化的频率。根据数据类型,使用卡方检验和曼-惠特尼检验对数据进行统计学分析。使用多元逻辑回归来测试那些与每种情景下对一种方法的偏好显著且独立相关的因素。

结果

在抽取的200名中国年轻临床医生中,59.0%的人在接受教育或观看DAs之前表示倾向于SDM并希望参与其中,在观看了关于他汀类药物选择的SDM过程示例视频后,这一比例增加到了69.0%。然而,28.5%的受访者仍表示,在他们目前的临床实践中,他们代表患者做出临床决策。那些拒绝使用DAs的临床医生表示,在中国实施SDM或使用DAs的主要障碍是缺乏时间和对SDM的了解。

结论

大多数中国年轻临床医生希望参与SDM。然而,他们表示实施SDM的主要障碍是缺乏经验和时间。发现让临床医生接触DAs的关于SDM的教育干预提高了他们的接受度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4672/6656904/a971779c3061/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4672/6656904/a971779c3061/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4672/6656904/a971779c3061/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Preferences and attitudes of young Chinese clinicians about using a shared decision making tools for communicating cardiovascular risk.中国年轻临床医生对于使用共同决策工具来传达心血管风险的偏好和态度。
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2019 Jun 17;5(2):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2019.05.001. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Exploring Provider Reactions to Decision Aid Distribution and Shared Decision Making: Lessons from Two Specialties.探索医疗服务提供者对决策辅助工具分发及共同决策的反应:来自两个专业领域的经验教训。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):113-126. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16671933. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
3
Assessing the feasibility and quality of shared decision making in China: evaluating a clinical encounter intervention for Chinese patients.评估中国共同决策的可行性和质量:评估针对中国患者的临床诊疗干预措施。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Nov 14;10:2341-2350. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S115115. eCollection 2016.
4
The Learning Curve for Shared Decision-making in Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis.症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的共享决策学习曲线。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;5(4):442-448. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5719.
5
PCI Choice: Cardiovascular clinicians' perceptions of shared decision making in stable coronary artery disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的选择:心血管临床医生对稳定型冠状动脉疾病共同决策的看法
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jun;100(6):1136-1143. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 15.
6
Preparing Patients with Early Stage Prostate Cancer to Participate in Clinical Appointments Using a Shared Decision Making Training Video.使用共享决策制定培训视频准备早期前列腺癌患者参加临床预约。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Apr;42(3):364-374. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211028563. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
7
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
8
Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.个体反馈与辅导对肿瘤护理中共同决策咨询的有效性:一项随机临床试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 6;11(4):e35543. doi: 10.2196/35543.
9
What helps the successful implementation of digital decision aids supporting shared decision-making in cardiovascular diseases? A systematic review.什么有助于支持心血管疾病共同决策的数字决策辅助工具的成功实施?一项系统评价。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022 Nov 10;4(1):53-62. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac070. eCollection 2023 Jan.
10
Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review.通过共同决策让患者参与急诊科的医疗决策:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;19(8):959-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01414.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac magnetic resonance follow-up of myocardial function in patients with chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries: a retrospective cohort study.冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞患者心肌功能的心脏磁共振随访:一项回顾性队列研究
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2025 Jun 30;15(3):610-623. doi: 10.21037/cdt-24-492. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
Measuring readiness for nurse-led shared decision making in clinical practice: development and first testing of the RSDM-N scale.衡量临床实践中护士主导的共同决策准备情况:RSDM-N量表的开发与首次测试
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 14;24(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03070-4.
3
Barriers of and strategies for shared decision-making implementation in the care of metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals in an Asian country.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore.界定新加坡接受麻醉患者共同决策的合理患者标准及偏好。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 2;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0172-2.
2
PCI Choice: Cardiovascular clinicians' perceptions of shared decision making in stable coronary artery disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的选择:心血管临床医生对稳定型冠状动脉疾病共同决策的看法
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jun;100(6):1136-1143. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 15.
3
Physicians Should Provide Shared Decision-Making for Anti-TNF Therapy to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.
转移性乳腺癌护理中共同决策实施的障碍和策略:在亚洲国家的患者和医疗保健专业人员中进行的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2837-2850. doi: 10.1111/hex.13590. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
4
Why do first-time mothers not intend to breastfeed? --A qualitative exploratory study on the decision-making of non-initiation in Jingzhou, China.为什么初产妇不打算母乳喂养?-- 一项关于中国荆州非起始决策的定性探索性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 7;22(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04494-5.
5
Association between Physicians' Perception of Shared Decision Making with Antibiotic Prescribing Behavior in Primary Care in Hubei, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国湖北基层医疗中医生对抗生素处方行为的共同决策认知与行为之间的关联:一项横断面研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Dec 8;9(12):876. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120876.
医生应为炎症性肠病患者的抗TNF治疗提供共同决策。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Jan;32(1):85-94. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.1.85.
4
Assessing the feasibility and quality of shared decision making in China: evaluating a clinical encounter intervention for Chinese patients.评估中国共同决策的可行性和质量:评估针对中国患者的临床诊疗干预措施。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Nov 14;10:2341-2350. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S115115. eCollection 2016.
5
Preferences Regarding Shared Decision-Making in Japanese Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.日本炎症性肠病患者对共同决策的偏好
Adv Ther. 2017 Jan;33(12):2242-2256. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0436-0. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
6
Patients' Perceptions and Experiences of Shared Decision-Making in Primary HIV Care Clinics.患者在初级艾滋病病毒护理诊所中对共同决策的认知与体验
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2017 Jan-Feb;28(1):75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
7
The impact of health literacy, patient-centered communication and shared decision-making on patients' satisfaction with care received in German primary care practices.健康素养、以患者为中心的沟通以及共同决策对德国初级医疗实践中患者对所接受护理的满意度的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1693-y.
8
Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences.实施共同决策:考虑所有后果。
Implement Sci. 2016 Aug 8;11:114. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0480-9.
9
Challenges of basic public health services provided by village doctors in Guizhou, China.中国贵州乡村医生提供基本公共卫生服务面临的挑战。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Mar;27(2 Suppl):69S-76S. doi: 10.1177/1010539514568708. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
10
Shared decision making in dermato-oncology: preference for involvement of melanoma patients.皮肤科肿瘤学中的共同决策:黑色素瘤患者更倾向于参与。
Melanoma Res. 2014 Feb;24(1):68-74. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000030.