Suppr超能文献

比较患者血液管理指南引入前不同规模和产科能力医院中 O 型 Rh(D)阴性红细胞在孕妇中的使用情况。

Comparison of group O Rh(D)- red blood cell use in pregnant women across hospitals of various sizes and obstetric capabilities prior to the introduction of patient blood management guidelines.

机构信息

Clinical and Population Perinatal Health Research, The University of Sydney Northern Clinical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Northern Sydney Local Health District, Kolling Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug;60(4):498-503. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13043. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

O Rh(D)- red blood cell (RBC) units can generally be transfused to most patients regardless of their ABO blood type and are frequently used during emergency situations. Detailed usage patterns of O Rh(D)- RBC units in obstetric populations have not been well characterised. With the introduction of patient blood management guidelines, historical usage patterns are important for providing comparative data.

AIMS

To determine how the use of O Rh(D)- RBC units in pregnant women differs between hospitals of different sizes and obstetric capabilities prior to patient blood management guidelines.

METHODS

Data from 67 New South Wales public hospital blood banks were linked with hospital and perinatal databases to identify RBC transfusions during pregnancy, birth and postnatally between July 2006 and December 2010. RBC transfusions were divided into O Rh(D)- or other blood types. Hospitals were classified according to birth volume, obstetric capability and location, with transfusions classified by timing and diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of the 12 078 RBC units transfused into pregnant women, 1062 (8.8%) were O Rh(D)-. Higher use of O Rh(D)- RBC units was seen in antenatal transfusions, preterm deliveries and in regional or smaller hospitals. There was wide variation in rates of O Rh(D)- RBC transfusion among hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of O Rh(D)- RBC unit use in obstetrics was lower during the period assessed than the nationally reported usage. It is encouraging that O Rh(D)- RBCs were more commonly used in emergency or specialised situations, or in facilities where holding a large blood inventory is not feasible.

摘要

背景

O 型 Rh(D)阴性红细胞(RBC)单位通常可输注给大多数患者,无论其 ABO 血型如何,并且在紧急情况下经常使用。在产科人群中,O 型 Rh(D)阴性 RBC 单位的详细使用模式尚未得到很好的描述。随着患者血液管理指南的引入,历史使用模式对于提供比较数据非常重要。

目的

确定在患者血液管理指南之前,不同规模和产科能力的医院中孕妇使用 O 型 Rh(D)阴性 RBC 单位的情况有何不同。

方法

将 67 家新南威尔士州公立医院血库的数据与医院和围产期数据库相关联,以确定 2006 年 7 月至 2010 年 12 月期间妊娠、分娩和产后期间的 RBC 输注情况。RBC 输注分为 O 型 Rh(D)阴性或其他血型。医院按分娩量、产科能力和位置进行分类,输血按时间和诊断进行分类。

结果

在输注给孕妇的 12078 个 RBC 单位中,有 1062 个(8.8%)是 O 型 Rh(D)阴性。在产前输注、早产和地区或较小的医院中,O 型 Rh(D)阴性 RBC 单位的使用量较高。各医院之间 O 型 Rh(D)阴性 RBC 输注率差异很大。

结论

在所评估的时间段内,产科中 O 型 Rh(D)阴性 RBC 单位的使用率低于全国报告的使用率。令人鼓舞的是,在紧急或专科情况下,或在难以储存大量血液的设施中,更常使用 O 型 Rh(D)阴性 RBC。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验