Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Thorac Cancer. 2019 Sep;10(9):1827-1833. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13157. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
Surgical method improvements aim to optimize the patient experience. The problem of healing of the drainage tube hole has not received attention and is of concern because it can plague patient recovery. In this article we report on how we have improved the method of suturing the drainage tube hole and explore the safety and effectiveness of this method. Between December 2017 to August 2018, 102 patients underwent thoracoscopic lung resection (single port or single utility port) using different methods of suturing drainage tube holes. The intervention group received improved methods with subcuticular and intradermal suture and removal-free stitches, whilst the control group received a conventional mattress suture and fixed chest tube. A preset line was left to tie knots and close the hole after the removal of the chest tube. The stitches were removed 7-12 days after surgery. The baseline clinical features of the patients were subsequently analyzed. The objective and subjective conditions of scars were evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) at one month after surgery. The intervention group (n = 71) and control group (n = 31) had balanced baseline clinical characteristics. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of three-day postoperative pain and postoperative hospital stay. In the intervention group, three patients (4.23%) had wound splitting that required re-suturing, which was better than five patients (16.13%) in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of pleural fluid outflow, wound infection, post-removal pneumothorax, chest tube prolapse and incisional hernia were not different between the two groups. We conclude that the objective and subjective evaluation results of scars were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05), and the experimental group was superior to the control group. A balanced result between aesthetic appearance and safety as regards video-assisted thoracic surgery can be achieved through the chest tube hole improved suture method. This method also improves the patient's recovery experience.
手术方法的改进旨在优化患者体验。引流管孔的愈合问题尚未得到关注,这令人担忧,因为它会影响患者的康复。本文报告了我们如何改进缝合引流管孔的方法,并探讨了这种方法的安全性和有效性。2017 年 12 月至 2018 年 8 月,102 例患者接受了不同方法缝合引流管孔的胸腔镜肺切除术(单端口或单器械端口)。干预组采用皮下和皮内缝合及免拆线的改进方法,对照组采用传统的褥式缝合和固定胸管。拔除胸管后,留下一条预设线以打结并关闭孔。术后 7-12 天拆线。随后分析了患者的基线临床特征。术后 1 个月采用温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)和患者与观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)评估瘢痕的客观和主观情况。干预组(n=71)和对照组(n=31)的基线临床特征均衡。两组患者术后 3 天疼痛和术后住院时间均无显著差异。干预组 3 例(4.23%)出现伤口裂开,需重新缝合,优于对照组 5 例(16.13%)(P<0.05)。两组患者胸腔积液外溢、伤口感染、拔除后气胸、胸管脱出和切口疝的发生率无差异。我们得出结论,两组患者的瘢痕客观和主观评价结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),实验组优于对照组。通过改进的胸腔引流管孔缝合方法,可以在美观与安全之间取得平衡,从而实现胸腔镜手术。这种方法还可以改善患者的康复体验。