• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of Pedestrian Detection With and Without Yellow-Lens Glasses During Simulated Night Driving With and Without Headlight Glare.模拟夜间驾驶时有无前照灯眩光情况下佩戴与不佩戴黄色镜片眼镜的行人检测比较。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct 1;137(10):1147-1153. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2893.
2
Impact of Oncoming Headlight Glare With Cataracts: A Pilot Study.白内障患者迎面汽车前照灯眩光的影响:一项初步研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 6;9:164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00164. eCollection 2018.
3
IMPACT OF HEADLIGHT GLARE ON PEDESTRIAN DETECTION WITH UNILATERAL CATARACT.前照灯眩光对单侧白内障患者行人检测的影响
Proc Int Driv Symp Hum Factors Driv Assess Train Veh Des. 2019 Jun;2019:36-42.
4
Drivers' judgments of the effect of headlight glare on their ability to see pedestrians at night.驾驶员对夜间前照灯眩光对其看见行人能力的影响的判断。
J Safety Res. 2015 Jun;53:31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
5
Seeing pedestrians at night: effect of driver age and visual abilities.夜间观察行人:驾驶员年龄和视觉能力的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Jul;34(4):452-8. doi: 10.1111/opo.12139. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
6
Night driving simulation in a randomized prospective comparison of Visian toric implantable collamer lens and conventional PRK for moderate to high myopic astigmatism.经随机前瞻性对比,评估 Visian 散光型可植入式隐形眼镜与常规 PRK 治疗中高度近视伴散光的夜间驾驶模拟效果。
J Refract Surg. 2010 May;26(5):321-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20090617-09. Epub 2010 May 19.
7
Refractive blur affects judgement of pedestrian walking direction at night.夜间,折射模糊会影响对行人行走方向的判断。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 May;41(3):582-590. doi: 10.1111/opo.12811. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
8
Even moderate visual impairments degrade drivers' ability to see pedestrians at night.即使是中度的视力障碍也会降低驾驶员在夜间看到行人的能力。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 May 4;53(6):2586-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9083.
9
Using retro-reflective cloth to enhance drivers' judgment of pedestrian walking direction at night-time.利用反光布增强夜间驾驶员对行人行走方向的判断。
J Safety Res. 2021 Jun;77:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
10
Effects of Different Levels of Refractive Blur on Nighttime Pedestrian Visibility.不同程度屈光性模糊对夜间行人可见性的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jul;56(8):4480-5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-16096.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Yellow Filter Use on Standard Automated Perimetry and Contrast Sensitivity in Healthy Individuals.使用黄色滤光片对健康个体标准自动视野计及对比敏感度的影响。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 8;16(1):e51912. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51912. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
The Effects of Glare on the Perception of Visual Motion as a Function of Age.眩光对视觉运动感知的影响:年龄因素的作用。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):11. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.9.11.
3
Association of Blue Light-Filtering Intraocular Lenses With All-Cause and Traffic Accident-Related Injuries Among Patients Undergoing Bilateral Cataract Surgery in Finland.芬兰接受双侧白内障手术患者中,蓝光滤过型人工晶状体与全因和与交通事故相关损伤的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2227232. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27232.
4
The Blue Light Hazard Versus Blue Light Hype.蓝光危害与蓝光炒作
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;240:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.02.016. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

模拟夜间驾驶时有无前照灯眩光情况下佩戴与不佩戴黄色镜片眼镜的行人检测比较。

Comparison of Pedestrian Detection With and Without Yellow-Lens Glasses During Simulated Night Driving With and Without Headlight Glare.

作者信息

Hwang Alex D, Tuccar-Burak Merve, Peli Eli

机构信息

Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct 1;137(10):1147-1153. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2893.

DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2893
PMID:31369054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6681548/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Some marketing materials for yellow-lens night-driving glasses claim that they increase nighttime road visibility and reduce oncoming headlight glare (HLG). However, there is no scientific evidence to support these claims.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the association between yellow-lens glasses and the detection of pedestrians with and without an oncoming HLG, using a driving simulator equipped with a custom HLG simulator.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-center cohort study was conducted between September 8, 2016, and October 25, 2017, at the Schepens Eye Research Institute. A total of 22 individuals participated in the study, divided into groups to determine response to a pedestrian wearing a navy blue shirt by younger individuals and, to control for participant's age and the interaction of the shirt color with the filter, response to a pedestrian wearing an orange shirt by a group of younger and older participants.

EXPOSURES

Participants drove scripted night-driving scenarios, 3 times with 3 commercially available yellow-lens glasses and once with clear-lens glasses, with the HLG simulator turned on and off. A total of 8 conditions were used for each participant.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Pedestrian detection response time.

RESULTS

The 22 participants who completed the study included 12 younger (mean [SD] age, 28 [7] years; 6 men) individuals who responded to a pedestrian wearing a dark navy blue shirt, as well as 6 younger (mean [SD] age, 27 [4] years; 4 men) and 4 older (mean [SD], 70 [11] years; all men) participants who responded to a pedestrian in an orange shirt. All participants had normal visual acuity (mean [SD], -0.05 [0.06] logMAR). No significant difference in response time with yellow lens was found in all experiment conditions; younger participants for dark navy blue shirt pedestrians (F1,33 = 0.59; P = .45), orange shirt pedestrians (F1,15 = 0.13; P = .72), and older participants for orange shirt pedestrians (F1,9 = 0.84; P = .38). Among all participants (n = 22), no significant main effect of yellow lenses was found (F1,63 = 0.64; P = .42). In all measuring conditions, the response times with the yellow lenses were not better than with the clear lenses. Significant main effects of HLG were found with dark navy blue shirt pedestrian condition for young participants (F1,33 = 7.34; P < .001) and with orange shirt pedestrian condition for older individuals (F1,9 = 75.32; P < .001), where the difference in response time between with and without HLG was larger for older (1.5 seconds) than younger (0.3 seconds) participants.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Using a driver simulator equipped with an HLG simulator, yellow-lens night-driving glasses did not appear to improve pedestrian detection at night or reduce the negative effects of HLG on pedestrian detection performance. These findings do not appear to support having eye care professionals advise patients to use yellow-lens night-driving glasses.

摘要

重要性

一些黄色镜片夜间驾驶眼镜的营销材料声称,它们能提高夜间道路能见度并减少迎面而来的前照灯眩光(HLG)。然而,没有科学证据支持这些说法。

目的

使用配备定制HLG模拟器的驾驶模拟器,测量黄色镜片眼镜与有或没有迎面HLG情况下行人检测之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:2016年9月8日至2017年10月25日在Schepens眼科研究所进行了一项单中心队列研究。共有22人参与该研究,分为几组,以确定年轻个体对穿着藏青色衬衫行人的反应,并为控制参与者年龄以及衬衫颜色与滤光片的相互作用,一组年轻和年长参与者对穿着橙色衬衫行人的反应。

暴露因素

参与者驾驶预设的夜间驾驶场景,佩戴3种市售黄色镜片眼镜各进行3次,佩戴透明镜片眼镜进行1次,HLG模拟器开启和关闭。每位参与者共使用8种条件。

主要结局和测量指标

行人检测反应时间。

结果

完成研究的22名参与者包括12名年轻个体(平均[标准差]年龄,28[7]岁;6名男性),他们对穿着深海军蓝衬衫的行人做出反应,以及6名年轻个体(平均[标准差]年龄,27[4]岁;4名男性)和4名年长个体(平均[标准差],70[11]岁;均为男性),他们对穿着橙色衬衫的行人做出反应。所有参与者视力正常(平均[标准差],-0.05[0.06]logMAR)。在所有实验条件下,黄色镜片的反应时间均未发现显著差异;年轻参与者对藏青色衬衫行人(F1,33 = 0.59;P = 0.45)、橙色衬衫行人(F1,15 = 0.13;P = 0.72),以及年长参与者对橙色衬衫行人(F1,9 = 0.84;P = 0.38)。在所有参与者(n = 22)中,未发现黄色镜片的显著主效应(F1,63 = 0.64;P = 0.42)。在所有测量条件下,黄色镜片的反应时间并不优于透明镜片。对于年轻参与者,在藏青色衬衫行人条件下发现HLG有显著主效应(F1,33 = 7.34;P < 0.001),对于年长个体,在橙色衬衫行人条件下发现HLG有显著主效应(F1,9 = 75.32;P < 0.001),其中年长参与者(1.5秒)在有和没有HLG时的反应时间差异大于年轻参与者(0.3秒)。

结论及相关性

使用配备HLG模拟器的驾驶模拟器,黄色镜片夜间驾驶眼镜似乎并未改善夜间行人检测,也未减少HLG对行人检测性能的负面影响。这些发现似乎不支持眼科护理专业人员建议患者使用黄色镜片夜间驾驶眼镜。