The Richard and Roxelyn Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Knowles Hearing Center, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):386-394. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000770.
Understanding the determinants of hearing aid use is important to improve the provision of hearing healthcare. Prior research has indicated that materials in the clinic and online, as well as audiologists' language during appointments, require a higher literacy level than most patients possess. We hypothesized that low health literacy is a barrier to entry in hearing healthcare, and therefore that health literacy would be positively correlated with the probability of hearing aid use.
We performed retrospective analyses of the Health and Retirement Study, a longitudinal survey of American adults of retirement age. Objective health literacy was measured in different but overlapping subsamples using subsets of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (n = 1240, n = 1586, and n = 2412). Subjective health literacy was assessed using a single-question screener in a larger sample (n = 8362). Separate discrete time models including common covariates of hearing aid use were constructed for each subsample.
Objective health literacy measures did not correlate significantly with hearing aid use when age, gender, race/ethnicity, self-assessed hearing ability, and net income were included in the models. Subjective health literacy did correlate significantly with hearing aid use in the complete model, with lower subjective health literacy correlated with lower odds of reporting hearing aid use.
Taken at face value, the results provide mixed evidence for a link between health literacy and hearing aid use. The results from the analysis of the largest sample, using the subjective health literacy measure, were consistent with the hypothesis that low health literacy is a barrier to hearing aid use. However, this was not supported by the analysis of the objective health literacy measures in these samples. Further research using full health literacy measurement tools and capturing other relevant variables would offer clarification on this conflict. The literacy level of clinical materials and conversation is a modifiable potential factor in hearing aid uptake, so further clinical and research consideration is warranted.
了解助听器使用的决定因素对于改善听力保健服务非常重要。先前的研究表明,诊所和网上的材料以及听力学家在预约时的语言都需要比大多数患者更高的文化程度。我们假设低健康素养是听力保健的一个进入障碍,因此健康素养与助听器使用的可能性呈正相关。
我们对健康与退休研究(一项针对美国退休年龄成年人的纵向调查)进行了回顾性分析。使用成人功能性健康素养测试和医学快速估计成人阅读能力测试的子集,在不同但重叠的子样本中测量了客观健康素养(n=1240,n=1586,n=2412)。在更大的样本(n=8362)中使用单一问题筛查器评估主观健康素养。为每个子样本构建了包含助听器使用常见协变量的单独离散时间模型。
当年龄、性别、种族/民族、自我评估的听力能力和净收入包含在模型中时,客观健康素养测量与助听器使用没有显著相关性。主观健康素养与助听器使用在完整模型中显著相关,较低的主观健康素养与较低的助听器使用几率相关。
从表面上看,这些结果提供了健康素养与助听器使用之间存在联系的混合证据。使用主观健康素养测量的最大样本分析的结果与低健康素养是助听器使用障碍的假设一致。然而,这并没有得到这些样本中客观健康素养测量的分析支持。使用完整的健康素养测量工具和捕获其他相关变量的进一步研究将提供对这一冲突的澄清。临床材料和对话的文化程度是助听器使用率的一个可改变的潜在因素,因此需要进一步的临床和研究考虑。