Suppr超能文献

健康素养与听力保健利用。

Health Literacy and Hearing Healthcare Use.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2021 May;131(5):E1688-E1694. doi: 10.1002/lary.29313. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether health literacy is associated with: 1) degree of hearing loss at initial presentation for audiogram and 2) hearing aid adoption for hearing aid candidates.

METHODS

We identified 1376 patients who underwent audiometric testing and completed a brief health literacy questionnaire at our institution. The association between health literacy and degree of hearing loss at initial presentation was examined using linear regression, adjusted for age, gender, marital status, education level, race, language, employment status, and insurance coverage. The association between health literacy and hearing aid adoption was examined in the subset of patients identified as hearing aid candidates using logistic regression, adjusted for demographic factors and insurance coverage.

RESULTS

Patients with inadequate health literacy were more likely to present with more severe hearing loss (adjusted mean pure-tone average [PTA] difference, 5.38 dB, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.75 to 8.01). For hearing aid candidates (n = 472 [41.6%]), health literacy was not associated with hearing aid adoption rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.76). Hearing aid coverage through Medicaid (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.37), and moderate (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.69) or moderate-severe (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.16) hearing loss were associated with hearing aid adoption.

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, patients with low health literacy are more likely to present with higher degrees of hearing loss, but no less likely to obtain hearing aids compared with patients with adequate health literacy. Hearing loss severity and hearing aid coverage by insurance appear to be the main drivers of hearing aid adoption.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 131:E1688-E1694, 2021.

摘要

目的

评估健康素养是否与以下因素相关:1)初始听力图检查时的听力损失程度,2)助听候选人使用助听器。

方法

我们在机构中识别了 1376 名接受听力测试并完成简短健康素养问卷的患者。使用线性回归,调整年龄、性别、婚姻状况、教育水平、种族、语言、就业状况和保险范围,检验健康素养与初始表现时听力损失程度的关系。使用逻辑回归,调整人口统计学因素和保险范围,在确定为助听候选人的患者亚组中检验健康素养与助听器采用的关系。

结果

健康素养不足的患者更有可能出现更严重的听力损失(调整后的纯音平均听力 [PTA] 差异,5.38dB,95%置信区间 [CI] 2.75 至 8.01)。对于助听候选人(n=472 [41.6%]),健康素养与助听器采用率无关(比值比 [OR] 0.85,95%CI 0.40 至 1.76)。通过医疗补助(OR 2.22,95%CI 1.13 至 4.37)和中度(OR 2.70,95%CI 1.58 至 4.69)或中重度(OR 2.23,95%CI 1.19 至 4.16)听力损失覆盖助听器与助听器采用相关。

结论

在我们的人群中,健康素养低的患者更有可能出现更高程度的听力损失,但与健康素养足够的患者相比,他们获得助听器的可能性并没有降低。听力损失的严重程度和保险覆盖的助听器似乎是助听器采用的主要驱动因素。

证据水平

3 Laryngoscope,131:E1688-E1694,2021。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验