Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2021 May;131(5):E1688-E1694. doi: 10.1002/lary.29313. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
To assess whether health literacy is associated with: 1) degree of hearing loss at initial presentation for audiogram and 2) hearing aid adoption for hearing aid candidates.
We identified 1376 patients who underwent audiometric testing and completed a brief health literacy questionnaire at our institution. The association between health literacy and degree of hearing loss at initial presentation was examined using linear regression, adjusted for age, gender, marital status, education level, race, language, employment status, and insurance coverage. The association between health literacy and hearing aid adoption was examined in the subset of patients identified as hearing aid candidates using logistic regression, adjusted for demographic factors and insurance coverage.
Patients with inadequate health literacy were more likely to present with more severe hearing loss (adjusted mean pure-tone average [PTA] difference, 5.38 dB, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.75 to 8.01). For hearing aid candidates (n = 472 [41.6%]), health literacy was not associated with hearing aid adoption rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.76). Hearing aid coverage through Medicaid (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.37), and moderate (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.69) or moderate-severe (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.16) hearing loss were associated with hearing aid adoption.
In our population, patients with low health literacy are more likely to present with higher degrees of hearing loss, but no less likely to obtain hearing aids compared with patients with adequate health literacy. Hearing loss severity and hearing aid coverage by insurance appear to be the main drivers of hearing aid adoption.
3 Laryngoscope, 131:E1688-E1694, 2021.
评估健康素养是否与以下因素相关:1)初始听力图检查时的听力损失程度,2)助听候选人使用助听器。
我们在机构中识别了 1376 名接受听力测试并完成简短健康素养问卷的患者。使用线性回归,调整年龄、性别、婚姻状况、教育水平、种族、语言、就业状况和保险范围,检验健康素养与初始表现时听力损失程度的关系。使用逻辑回归,调整人口统计学因素和保险范围,在确定为助听候选人的患者亚组中检验健康素养与助听器采用的关系。
健康素养不足的患者更有可能出现更严重的听力损失(调整后的纯音平均听力 [PTA] 差异,5.38dB,95%置信区间 [CI] 2.75 至 8.01)。对于助听候选人(n=472 [41.6%]),健康素养与助听器采用率无关(比值比 [OR] 0.85,95%CI 0.40 至 1.76)。通过医疗补助(OR 2.22,95%CI 1.13 至 4.37)和中度(OR 2.70,95%CI 1.58 至 4.69)或中重度(OR 2.23,95%CI 1.19 至 4.16)听力损失覆盖助听器与助听器采用相关。
在我们的人群中,健康素养低的患者更有可能出现更高程度的听力损失,但与健康素养足够的患者相比,他们获得助听器的可能性并没有降低。听力损失的严重程度和保险覆盖的助听器似乎是助听器采用的主要驱动因素。
3 Laryngoscope,131:E1688-E1694,2021。