Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Bone. 2019 Oct;127:577-591. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.07.022. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
Bone fracture repair represents an important clinical challenge with nearly 1 million non-union fractures occurring annually in the U.S. Gene expression differs between non-union and healthy repair, suggesting there is a pattern of gene expression that is indicative of optimal repair. Despite this, the gene expression profile of fracture repair remains incompletely understood. In this work, we used RNA-seq of two well-established murine fracture models to describe gene expression of intramembranous and endochondral bone formation. We used top differentially expressed genes, enriched gene ontology terms and pathways, callus cellular phenotyping, and histology to describe and contrast these bone formation processes across time. Intramembranous repair, as modeled by ulnar stress fracture, and endochondral repair, as modeled by femur full fracture, exhibited vastly different transcriptional profiles throughout repair. Stress fracture healing had enriched differentially expressed genes associated with bone repair and osteoblasts, highlighting the strong osteogenic repair process of this model. Interestingly, the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway was one of only a few pathways uniquely enriched in stress fracture repair. Full fracture repair involved a higher level of inflammatory and immune cell related genes than did stress fracture repair. Full fracture repair also differed from stress fracture in a robust downregulation of ion channel genes following injury, the role of which in fracture repair is unclear. This study offers a broad description of gene expression in intramembranous and endochondral ossification across several time points throughout repair and suggests several potentially intriguing genes, pathways, and cells whose role in fracture repair requires further study.
骨骨折修复是一个重要的临床挑战,在美国每年有近 100 万例骨折不愈合。非愈合和健康修复之间的基因表达存在差异,这表明存在一种基因表达模式,提示着最佳修复的可能性。尽管如此,骨折修复的基因表达谱仍不完全清楚。在这项工作中,我们使用两种成熟的鼠类骨折模型的 RNA-seq 来描述膜内和软骨内骨形成的基因表达。我们使用了差异表达基因、富集的基因本体论术语和途径、骨痂细胞表型和组织学来描述和对比这些骨形成过程随时间的变化。由尺骨应力性骨折模拟的膜内修复和由股骨完全骨折模拟的软骨内修复在整个修复过程中表现出截然不同的转录谱。应力性骨折愈合具有丰富的与骨修复和成骨细胞相关的差异表达基因,突出了该模型强烈的成骨修复过程。有趣的是,PI3K-Akt 信号通路是唯一在应力性骨折修复中富集的几个途径之一。全骨折修复涉及到比应力性骨折修复更多的炎症和免疫细胞相关基因。全骨折修复与应力性骨折修复的另一个区别在于,损伤后离子通道基因的表达明显下调,其在骨折修复中的作用尚不清楚。这项研究提供了在整个修复过程中的几个时间点上,膜内和软骨内骨化过程中基因表达的广泛描述,并提出了一些可能有趣的基因、途径和细胞,它们在骨折修复中的作用需要进一步研究。