Aravind Eye Hospital, Chennai, India.
Altos Eye Physicians, Los Altos, California, USA.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Sep;45(9):1226-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
To analyze the posterior capsule rupture (PCR) rates among staff and trainee cataract surgeons, and the postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) rates in uncomplicated and complicated eyes both with and without intracameral moxifloxacin prophylaxis (ICMP).
Ten regional Aravind Eye Hospitals in India.
Retrospective multicenter clinical registry within a single hospital network.
POE rates with and without ICMP were statistically compared for all eyes and separately for trainees versus staff, for phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery (M-SICS), and for a subgroup of eyes complicated by PCR or requiring secondary surgery.
All cataract surgeries (2 062 643) performed during the 8-year period from 2011 to 2018 at the 10 regional Aravind Eye hospitals were included in the analysis. With ICMP, the overall POE rate declined from 692 (0.07%) of 993 009 eyes to 185 (0.02%) of 1 069 634 eyes (P < .001). This was independently significant for phacoemulsification and for M-SICS (P < .001). The overall PCR rate was 28 352 (1.37%) of 2 062 643 eyes, and it was statistically higher for trainees irrespective of surgical method (P < .001). Both staff and trainee surgeons had higher PCR rates with phacoemulsification than with M-SICS (P < .001). Absent ICMP, PCR increased the overall POE rate by more than 7-fold to 63 (0.43%) of 14 505 eyes. ICMP reduced the POE rate after PCR to 25 (0.18%) of 13 847 eyes (P = .002). This ICMP benefit was separately significant for both M-SICS (0.54% vs 0.26%, P = .01) and phacoemulsification (0.29% vs 0.06%, P = .005). The POE rate was especially high after secondary IOL implantation (0.90% without ICMP vs 0.34% with ICMP; P = .10).
ICMP reduced the POE rate overall, with phacoemulsification, with M-SICS, and in eyes with PCR.
分析白内障手术医生(包括医生和受训者)中后囊膜破裂(PCR)的发生率,以及在使用和不使用眼内莫西沙星预防(ICMP)的情况下,单纯眼和复杂眼(包括有 PCR 或需要二次手术的眼)术后眼内炎(POE)的发生率。
印度阿伐丁眼科医院的十个区域中心。
在单个医院网络内进行回顾性多中心临床注册。
统计分析了所有眼在使用和不使用 ICMP 时的 POE 发生率,以及受训者与医生、超声乳化白内障吸除术(ECCE)与小切口白内障囊外摘除术(MICS)、以及有 PCR 或需要二次手术的眼亚组的 POE 发生率。
在 2011 年至 2018 年的 8 年期间,阿伐丁眼科医院的 10 个区域中心共进行了 2062643 例白内障手术,均纳入分析。使用 ICMP 后,993009 只眼的总 POE 发生率从 692 例(0.07%)降至 1069634 只眼的 185 例(0.02%)(P<.001)。ECCE 和 MICS 中这一结果均具有统计学意义(P<.001)。2062643 只眼中总的 PCR 发生率为 28352 例(1.37%),不论手术方法如何,受训者的 PCR 发生率均较高(P<.001)。与 MICS 相比,ECCE 中医生和受训者的 PCR 发生率更高(P<.001)。无 ICMP 时,PCR 将总 POE 发生率提高了 7 倍以上,达到 14505 只眼中的 63 例(0.43%)。PCR 后使用 ICMP 将 POE 发生率降至 13847 只眼中的 25 例(0.18%)(P=.002)。这一 ICMP 益处对 MICS(0.54%比 0.26%,P=.01)和 ECCE(0.29%比 0.06%,P=.005)都有显著意义。二次 IOL 植入后的 POE 发生率尤其高(无 ICMP 时为 0.90%,有 ICMP 时为 0.34%;P=.10)。
ICMP 降低了白内障手术医生中,包括医生和受训者、ECCE 和 MICS 以及有 PCR 的眼的 POE 发生率。