Sun Yeqi, Yu Wenwei, Guan Wenbin, Cai Lei, Qiao Meng, Zheng Leizhen, Jiang Ruiqi, Wang Ruifen, Wang Lifeng
Department of Pathology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200092, People's Republic of China.
Department of Oncology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200092, People's Republic of China.
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jul 10;11:6397-6410. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S206189. eCollection 2019.
Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has emerged as a novel therapy for cancer. To identify rational candidates for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in gastric cancer (GC), the abundance of PD-L1 expression was evaluated on a kind of biomarker-based molecular classification for shaping prognosis and treatment planning.
One hundred and sixty-five GCs were classified into five subgroups using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) methods, based on a panel of seven markers (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6, E-cadherin, P53, and Epstein-Barr virus mRNA). The expression of PD-L1 in GC tissues was analyzed immunohistochemically.
The five categories (Epstein-Barr virus positivity, microsatellite instability, aberrant E-cadherin, aberrant P53 expression, and normal P53 expression) correspond to the reported molecular subgroups for similar proportions and clinicopathologic characteristics. Survival analysis indicated that subgroups with aberrant E-cadherin expression independently predicted a worse prognosis in GC patients (HR=2.51, =0.010). The clinical and prognostic profiles produced by this stratification in nonintestinal-type GC were distinguishable from those in intestinal-type. Although PD-L1 was not a significant prognostic factor, that more frequent presence of PD-L1-positive in microsatellite instability tumors than other subtypes (<0.010) hinted at a prolonged clinical course. Moreover, the lowest level of PD-L1 but the highest of Her2 was observed in the group of aberrant P53, namely it was suggested that there was a negative correlation between PD-L1 and Her2 overexpression.
Different molecular subtypes in GC may have a tendency to react differently to anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy or anti-Her2 therapy. A combination of PD-L1 expression and this cost-effective classification strategy would be helpful for predicting prognosis and promoting personalized therapy in clinical practice.
靶向PD-1/PD-L1通路已成为一种新型癌症治疗方法。为了确定胃癌(GC)抗PD-1/PD-L1免疫治疗的合理候选者,基于一种用于预后和治疗规划的生物标志物分子分类评估了PD-L1表达丰度。
基于七种标志物(MLH1、PMS2、MSH2、MSH6、E-钙黏蛋白、P53和爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒mRNA),采用免疫组织化学(IHC)和原位杂交(ISH)方法将165例GC分为五个亚组。免疫组织化学分析GC组织中PD-L1的表达。
这五个类别(爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒阳性、微卫星不稳定性、异常E-钙黏蛋白、异常P53表达和正常P53表达)与报道的分子亚组相对应,比例和临床病理特征相似。生存分析表明,异常E-钙黏蛋白表达亚组独立预测GC患者预后较差(HR=2.51,P=0.010)。这种分层在非肠型GC中产生的临床和预后特征与肠型不同。虽然PD-L1不是一个显著的预后因素,但微卫星不稳定性肿瘤中PD-L1阳性的出现频率高于其他亚型(P<0.010),这提示临床病程延长。此外,在异常P53组中观察到PD-L1水平最低但Her2水平最高,即提示PD-L1与Her2过表达之间存在负相关。
GC中的不同分子亚型对抗PD-L1/PD-1免疫治疗或抗Her2治疗可能有不同的反应倾向。PD-L1表达与这种经济有效的分类策略相结合将有助于预测预后并促进临床实践中的个性化治疗。