• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重现癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)和亚洲癌症研究组织(ACRG)胃癌分子分类及其与摩洛哥患者临床病理特征和总生存的关联。

Reproduction of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) Gastric Cancer Molecular Classifications and Their Association with Clinicopathological Characteristics and Overall Survival in Moroccan Patients.

机构信息

Biomedical and Translational Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco.

Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tangier, Morocco.

出版信息

Dis Markers. 2021 Jul 28;2021:9980410. doi: 10.1155/2021/9980410. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/9980410
PMID:34367379
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8342151/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project and Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) recently categorized gastric cancer into molecular subtypes. Nevertheless, these classification systems require high cost and sophisticated molecular technologies, preventing their widespread use in the clinic. This study is aimed to generating molecular subtypes of gastric cancer using techniques available in routine diagnostic practice in a series of Moroccan gastric cancer patients. In addition, we assessed the associations between molecular subtypes, clinicopathological features, and prognosis.

METHODS

Ninety-seven gastric cancer cases were classified according to TCGA, ACRG, and integrated classifications using a panel of four molecular markers (EBV, MSI, E-cadherin, and p53). HER2 status and PD-L1 expression were also evaluated. These markers were analyzed using immunohistochemistry (E-cadherin, p53, HER2, and PD-L1), in situ hybridization (EBV and HER2 equivocal cases), and multiplex PCR (MSI).

RESULTS

Our results showed that the subtypes presented distinct clinicopathological features and prognosis. EBV-positive gastric cancers were found exclusively in male patients. The GS (TCGA classification), MSS/EMT (ACRG classification), and E-cadherin aberrant subtype (integrated classification) presented the Lauren diffuse histology enrichment and tended to be diagnosed at a younger age. The MSI subtype was associated with a better overall survival across all classifications (TCGA, ACRG, and integrated classification). The worst prognosis was observed in the EBV subtype (TCGA and integrated classification) and MSS/EMT subtype (ACRG classification). . We reported a reproducible and affordable gastric cancer subtyping algorithms that can reproduce the recently recognized TCGA, ACRG, and integrated gastric cancer classifications, using techniques available in routine diagnosis. These simplified classifications can be employed not only for molecular classification but also in predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer patients.

摘要

简介

癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)项目和亚洲癌症研究组织(ACRG)最近将胃癌分为分子亚型。然而,这些分类系统需要高昂的成本和复杂的分子技术,因此无法在临床广泛应用。本研究旨在使用摩洛哥一系列胃癌患者常规诊断实践中可用的技术生成胃癌的分子亚型。此外,我们评估了分子亚型、临床病理特征和预后之间的关联。

方法

根据 TCGA、ACRG 和使用四个分子标志物(EBV、MSI、E-钙黏蛋白和 p53)的综合分类,对 97 例胃癌病例进行分类。还评估了 HER2 状态和 PD-L1 表达。使用免疫组织化学(E-钙黏蛋白、p53、HER2 和 PD-L1)、原位杂交(EBV 和 HER2 不确定病例)和多重 PCR(MSI)分析这些标志物。

结果

我们的结果表明,这些亚型具有不同的临床病理特征和预后。仅在男性患者中发现 EBV 阳性胃癌。GS(TCGA 分类)、MSS/EMT(ACRG 分类)和 E-钙黏蛋白异常亚型(综合分类)呈现弥漫性组织学丰富的Lauren 组织学,并倾向于在更年轻的年龄诊断。MSI 亚型在所有分类(TCGA、ACRG 和综合分类)中均与总体生存时间延长相关。EBV 亚型(TCGA 和综合分类)和 MSS/EMT 亚型(ACRG 分类)的预后最差。我们报告了一种可重现且经济实惠的胃癌亚分型算法,该算法可使用常规诊断中可用的技术,重现最近公认的 TCGA、ACRG 和综合胃癌分类。这些简化的分类不仅可用于分子分类,还可用于预测胃癌患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/8342151/837298bdb040/DM2021-9980410.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/8342151/46082c391ad9/DM2021-9980410.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/8342151/0efe31a985ab/DM2021-9980410.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/8342151/837298bdb040/DM2021-9980410.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/8342151/46082c391ad9/DM2021-9980410.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/8342151/0efe31a985ab/DM2021-9980410.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ca/8342151/837298bdb040/DM2021-9980410.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Reproduction of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) Gastric Cancer Molecular Classifications and Their Association with Clinicopathological Characteristics and Overall Survival in Moroccan Patients.重现癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)和亚洲癌症研究组织(ACRG)胃癌分子分类及其与摩洛哥患者临床病理特征和总生存的关联。
Dis Markers. 2021 Jul 28;2021:9980410. doi: 10.1155/2021/9980410. eCollection 2021.
2
Clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of TCGA and ACRG classification in gastric cancer among the Chinese population.在中国人群中,TCGA 和 ACRG 分类在胃癌中的临床特征和预后意义。
Mol Med Rep. 2020 Aug;22(2):828-840. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11183. Epub 2020 May 22.
3
Histo- and immunohistochemistry-based estimation of the TCGA and ACRG molecular subtypes for gastric carcinoma and their prognostic significance: A single-institution study.基于组织学和免疫组织化学的 TCGA 和 ACRG 分子亚型在胃癌中的评估及其预后意义:一项单中心研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 2;14(12):e0224812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224812. eCollection 2019.
4
Gastric cancer molecular classification based on immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization: Analysis in western patients after curative-intent surgery.基于免疫组织化学和原位杂交的胃癌分子分类:对接受根治性手术的西方患者的分析
World J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 24;12(8):688-701. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i8.688.
5
Subtraction of Epstein-Barr virus and microsatellite instability genotypes from the Lauren histotypes: Combined molecular and histologic subtyping with clinicopathological and prognostic significance validated in a cohort of 1,248 cases.从劳伦组织学分型中减去 Epstein-Barr 病毒和微卫星不稳定性基因型:在 1248 例队列中验证的联合分子和组织学亚型与临床病理和预后意义。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Dec 15;145(12):3218-3230. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32215. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Clinicopathologic Features and Prognostic Significance of Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Hybridization Based Molecular Classification in Gastric Carcinoma.基于免疫组织化学和原位杂交的分子分类在胃癌中的临床病理特征及预后意义。
J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2023;42(4):1-14. doi: 10.1615/JEnvironPatholToxicolOncol.2023047662.
7
Molecular subtyping of gastric cancer according to ACRG using immunohistochemistry - Correlation with clinical parameters.根据 ACRG 使用免疫组织化学对胃癌进行分子亚型分类 - 与临床参数的相关性。
Pathol Res Pract. 2022 Mar;231:153797. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2022.153797. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
8
Molecular subtyping of gastroesophageal dysplasia heterogeneity according to TCGA/ACRG classes.根据 TCGA/ACRG 分类对胃食管发育不良异质性进行分子亚型分类。
Virchows Arch. 2022 Oct;481(4):545-552. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03392-7. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
9
High PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer (GC) patients and correlation with molecular features.胃癌(GC)患者中 PD-L1 的高表达及其与分子特征的相关性。
Pathol Res Pract. 2020 Apr;216(4):152881. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2020.152881. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
10
Clinicopathological and prognostic features of Epstein-Barr virus infection, microsatellite instability, and PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer.胃癌中爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒感染、微卫星不稳定性及程序性死亡受体配体1表达的临床病理特征和预后特征
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;117(5):829-839. doi: 10.1002/jso.25022. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Epidemiology of PD-L1 Expression in Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.EB病毒相关胃癌中PD-L1表达的全球流行病学:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Aug 26;56(1):178. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01305-w.
2
Plumbagin targets the GLUT1/MMP-2 axis to inhibit oral squamous cell carcinoma progression.白花丹醌靶向GLUT1/MMP-2轴以抑制口腔鳞状细胞癌进展。
Cancer Cell Int. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12935-025-03915-7.
3
Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression in Gastric Cancer Cases in Zambia.

本文引用的文献

1
Microsatellite Instability Analysis in Gastric Carcinomas of Moroccan Patients.对摩洛哥患者胃癌中微卫星不稳定性的分析。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2021 Feb;25(2):116-123. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2020.0146.
2
Clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of TCGA and ACRG classification in gastric cancer among the Chinese population.在中国人群中,TCGA 和 ACRG 分类在胃癌中的临床特征和预后意义。
Mol Med Rep. 2020 Aug;22(2):828-840. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11183. Epub 2020 May 22.
3
Gastric cancer molecular classification and adjuvant therapy: Is there a different benefit according to the subtype?
赞比亚胃癌病例中程序性死亡配体-1的表达
J Agric Biomed Sci. 2025 Apr-Jun;9(2). doi: 10.53974/unza.jabs.9.2.1492. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
4
Comparison of clinicopathological parameters with the presence of Epstein-Barr virus and the absence of DNA mismatch repair proteins in gastric adenocarcinomas.胃腺癌中爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒的存在及DNA错配修复蛋白的缺失与临床病理参数的比较。
Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2025 Apr 30;19(2):86-93. doi: 10.2478/abm-2025-0011. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Proportional Correlation Between Systemic Inflammation Response Index and Gastric Cancer Recurrence Time: A Retrospective Study.全身炎症反应指数与胃癌复发时间的相关性:一项回顾性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;17(9):1415. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091415.
6
Combination therapies and novel delivery systems: a new frontier in overcoming TRAIL resistance in gastric cancer.联合疗法与新型给药系统:克服胃癌中TRAIL耐药性的新前沿。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04208-6.
7
Combining Apatinib and Oxaliplatin Remodels the Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment and Sensitizes Desert-Type Gastric Cancer to Immunotherapy.阿帕替尼联合奥沙利铂重塑免疫抑制性肿瘤微环境并使“冷”型胃癌对免疫治疗敏感。
Cancer Res. 2025 Jun 2;85(11):2117-2133. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-24-2697.
8
Effect of prior and first-line immunotherapy on baseline immune biomarkers and modulation of the tumor microenvironment in response to nivolumab and relatlimab combination therapy in patients with melanoma from RELATIVITY-020.既往和一线免疫治疗对来自RELATIVITY-020研究的黑色素瘤患者的基线免疫生物标志物的影响以及对纳武利尤单抗和瑞派替尼联合治疗的肿瘤微环境调节作用。
J Immunother Cancer. 2025 Feb 25;13(2):e009773. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-009773.
9
Predictive Mortality and Gastric Cancer Risk Using Clinical and Socio-Economic Data: A Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study.利用临床和社会经济数据预测死亡率和胃癌风险:一项全国性多中心队列研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 25;17(1):30. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010030.
10
Implementation of the ProMisE classifier and validation of its prognostic impact in Brazilian endometrial carcinomas.ProMisE分类器在巴西子宫内膜癌中的应用及其预后影响的验证。
Front Oncol. 2024 Dec 13;14:1503901. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1503901. eCollection 2024.
胃癌分子分型与辅助治疗:根据亚型是否存在不同获益?
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;121(5):804-813. doi: 10.1002/jso.25792. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
4
Histo- and immunohistochemistry-based estimation of the TCGA and ACRG molecular subtypes for gastric carcinoma and their prognostic significance: A single-institution study.基于组织学和免疫组织化学的 TCGA 和 ACRG 分子亚型在胃癌中的评估及其预后意义:一项单中心研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 2;14(12):e0224812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224812. eCollection 2019.
5
Integrated assessment of PD-L1 expression and molecular classification facilitates therapy selection and prognosis prediction in gastric cancer.PD-L1表达与分子分类的综合评估有助于胃癌的治疗选择和预后预测。
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jul 10;11:6397-6410. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S206189. eCollection 2019.
6
Mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability-high as a predictor for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy efficacy.错配修复缺陷/微卫星不稳定高作为抗 PD-1/PD-L1 免疫治疗疗效的预测指标。
J Hematol Oncol. 2019 May 31;12(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0738-1.
7
Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods.估算 2018 年全球癌症发病率和死亡率:GLOBOCAN 来源和方法。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
8
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Outlooks on Epstein-Barr virus associated gastric cancer.埃克斯坦巴尔病毒相关胃癌的展望。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 May;66:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
10
Gastric cancer: immunohistochemical classification of molecular subtypes and their association with clinicopathological characteristics.胃癌:分子亚型的免疫组织化学分类及其与临床病理特征的关联
Virchows Arch. 2018 Mar;472(3):369-382. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2240-x. Epub 2017 Oct 19.