Suppr超能文献

肺癌机器人辅助肺叶切除术的学习曲线

Learning curve for robot-assisted lobectomy of lung cancer.

作者信息

Song Guisong, Sun Xiao, Miao Shuncheng, Li Shicheng, Zhao Yandong, Xuan Yunpeng, Qiu Tong, Niu Zejun, Song Jianfang, Jiao Wenjie

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jun;11(6):2431-2437. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.71.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic lobectomy is widely used for lung cancer treatment. So far, few studies have been performed to systematically analyze the learning curve. Our purpose is to define the learning curve to provide a training guideline of this technique.

METHODS

A total of 208 consecutive patients with primary lung cancer who underwent robotic-assisted lobectomy by our surgical team were enrolled in this study. Baseline information and postoperative outcomes were collected. Learning curves were then analyzed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method. Patients were divided into three groups according to the cut-off points of the learning curve. Intraoperative characteristics and short-term outcomes were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

CUSUM plots revealed that the docking time, console time and total surgical time in patients were 20, 34 and 32 cases, respectively. Comparison of the surgical time among the 3 phases revealed that the total surgical time (197.03±27.67, 152.61±21.07, 141.35±29.11 min, P<0.001), console time (150.97±26.13, 103.89±18.04, 97.49±24.80 min, P<0.001) and docking time (13.53±2.08, 11.95±1.10, 11.89±1.49 min, P<0.001) were decreased significantly. Estimated blood loss differed among groups (90.63±45.41, 87.63±59.84, 60.29±28.59 mL, P=0.001) and was associated with shorter operative time. There was no conversion or 30-day mortality. No significant differences were observed among other clinic-pathological characteristics among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For a surgeon, the learning time of robotic lobectomy was in the 32th operation. For a bedside assistant, at least 20 cases were required to achieve the level of optimal docking.

摘要

背景

机器人肺叶切除术广泛应用于肺癌治疗。到目前为止,很少有研究对学习曲线进行系统分析。我们的目的是确定学习曲线,为该技术提供培训指南。

方法

本研究纳入了由我们手术团队连续进行机器人辅助肺叶切除术的208例原发性肺癌患者。收集基线信息和术后结果。然后使用累积和(CUSUM)方法分析学习曲线。根据学习曲线的分界点将患者分为三组。比较三组的术中特征和短期结果。

结果

CUSUM图显示,患者的对接时间、控制台操作时间和总手术时间分别为20例、34例和32例。三个阶段手术时间的比较显示,总手术时间(197.03±27.67、152.61±21.07、141.35±29.11分钟,P<0.001)、控制台操作时间(150.97±26.13、103.89±18.04、97.49±24.80分钟,P<0.001)和对接时间(13.53±2.08、11.95±1.10、11.89±1.49分钟,P<0.001)均显著缩短。估计失血量在组间存在差异(90.63±45.41、87.63±59.84、60.29±28.59毫升,P=0.001),且与较短的手术时间相关。无中转或30天死亡率。组间其他临床病理特征未观察到显著差异。

结论

对于外科医生而言,机器人肺叶切除术的学习时间在第32例手术时。对于床边助手而言,至少需要20例才能达到最佳对接水平。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Extended lobectomy-how minimally invasive can we go?扩大肺叶切除术——我们能做到多微创?
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 May 31;13(5):961-964. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-296. Epub 2024 May 17.

本文引用的文献

3
The Learning Curve for Robotic McKeown Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.机器人辅助 McKeown 食管癌根治术学习曲线。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Apr;105(4):1024-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.11.058. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
6
Consensus statement on definitions and nomenclature for robotic thoracic surgery.关于机器人胸腔手术定义和命名的共识声明。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Sep;154(3):1065-1069. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.02.081. Epub 2017 May 23.
7
Nationwide Assessment of Robotic Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.非小细胞肺癌机器人肺叶切除术的全国性评估
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Apr;103(4):1092-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.108. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验