• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第一作者性别对麻醉病例投稿接受率的影响。

The influence of first author sex on acceptance rates of submissions to Anaesthesia Cases.

机构信息

Department of Pain Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.

Department of Anaesthesia, Guys and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2019 Nov;74(11):1432-1438. doi: 10.1111/anae.14797. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1111/anae.14797
PMID:31373389
Abstract

More than 50% of medical students and 45% of practising doctors are female in the UK. In the specialty of anaesthesia, 32% of consultants are female. However, compared with males, females are under-represented as authors of articles published in high-impact journals. We investigated the proportion of female first authors by examining the case reports submitted to Anaesthesia Cases since its inception in 2013. We defined authors by their sex (male or female), that is, biological characteristics, rather than their gender. There were a total of 802 submissions to Anaesthesia Cases over 4.5 years. Sixteen submissions were excluded and of the remaining 786 submissions, 279 were accepted and 507 rejected, an acceptance rate of 35.5%. Twenty (2.5%) authors' sex could not be identified. The overall proportion of female first authors was 37.1%. The proportion of female first authors of accepted case reports was 42.1% and females were first authors of rejected case reports in 34.4%. We found that, compared with previous studies on female sex and gender bias in publishing, there was a relatively high proportion of female first authors publishing in Anaesthesia Cases and female first authors were more likely to be accepted than male first authors. Authorship is considered to reflect career success and there continues to be sex/gender inequity that must be tackled at all levels, from application to medical school, through research funding, journals and Editorial Boards.

摘要

在英国,超过 50%的医学生和 45%的执业医生是女性。在麻醉学专业中,32%的顾问是女性。然而,与男性相比,女性作为高影响力期刊文章的作者的代表性不足。我们通过检查自 2013 年创刊以来提交给《麻醉病例》的病例报告,调查了女性第一作者的比例。我们根据作者的性别(男性或女性),即生物学特征,而不是他们的性别来定义作者。在 Anaesthesia Cases 创刊的 4.5 年内,共收到 802 份投稿。有 16 份投稿被排除在外,在剩下的 786 份投稿中,有 279 份被接受,507 份被拒绝,接受率为 35.5%。有 20 位(2.5%)作者的性别无法确定。女性第一作者的总体比例为 37.1%。接受的病例报告中女性第一作者的比例为 42.1%,而被拒绝的病例报告中女性第一作者的比例为 34.4%。我们发现,与之前关于女性性别和出版中的性别偏见的研究相比,在 Anaesthesia Cases 中发表的女性第一作者的比例相对较高,而且女性第一作者比男性第一作者更有可能被接受。作者身份被认为反映了职业成功,而且在从申请医学院到研究经费、期刊和编辑委员会等各个层面都存在性别/性别不平等问题,必须加以解决。

相似文献

1
The influence of first author sex on acceptance rates of submissions to Anaesthesia Cases.第一作者性别对麻醉病例投稿接受率的影响。
Anaesthesia. 2019 Nov;74(11):1432-1438. doi: 10.1111/anae.14797. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
2
Gender Differences in the Authorship of Original Research in Pediatric Journals, 2001-2016.2001 - 2016年儿科期刊原创研究作者的性别差异
J Pediatr. 2017 Dec;191:244-249.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.044. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
3
Quantifying gender disparity in physician authorship among commentary articles in three high-impact medical journals: an observational study.量化三篇高影响力医学期刊评论文章中医生作者署名的性别差异:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 25;10(2):e034056. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034056.
4
Gender differences in authorships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal.在进化期刊中,作者的性别差异与发表偏倚无关。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0201725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201725. eCollection 2018.
5
Gender trends in authorship of spine-related academic literature-a 39-year perspective.脊柱相关学术文献著者的性别趋势——39 年的视角。
Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1749-1754. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.041. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
6
Gender gap in articles published in European Radiology and CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology: evolution between 2002 and 2016.欧洲放射学和心血管与介入放射学杂志发表文章中的性别差距:2002 年至 2016 年的演变。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):1011-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06390-7. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
7
Trends in Authorship in Anesthesiology Journals.麻醉学期刊的作者趋势。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Jul;129(1):306-310. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003949.
8
Women in Neurosurgery: Gender Differences in Authorship in High-Impact Neurosurgery Journals through the Last Two Decades.神经外科中的女性:过去二十年高影响力神经外科学期刊中作者署名的性别差异。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jun;138:374-380. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Women Authorship Trends in the Highest-Impact Anesthesiology Journals from 2005 to 2021.2005 年至 2021 年高影响力麻醉学期刊中的女性作者趋势。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 May;32(5):592-597. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0532. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
10
Trends in Gender Disparities in Authorship of Arthroplasty Research.关节置换研究中作者性别差异的趋势。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Dec 2;102(23):e131. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00258.

引用本文的文献

1
Position statement from the Editors of on equity, diversity and inclusion.《[刊物名称]》编辑关于公平、多样性和包容性的立场声明。
Anaesth Rep. 2023 Jul 6;11(2):e12231. doi: 10.1002/anr3.12231. eCollection 2023 Jul-Dec.
2
Evaluating scientific research barriers by gender and other characteristics from the perspective of ophthalmologists in Turkey: A multicenter survey study.从土耳其眼科医生的角度评估性别和其他特征的科研障碍:一项多中心调查研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 25;18(1):e0273181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273181. eCollection 2023.
3
Analysis of Gender-Based Authorship Trends in Leading Pain-Medicine Journals Over 10 Years.
10年间主要疼痛医学期刊基于性别的作者署名趋势分析。
Health Psychol Res. 2022 Nov 3;10(4):38356. doi: 10.52965/001c.38356. eCollection 2022.
4
The impact of peer review on the contribution potential of scientific papers.同行评审对科学论文贡献潜力的影响。
PeerJ. 2021 Sep 15;9:e11999. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11999. eCollection 2021.