Suppr超能文献

量化三篇高影响力医学期刊评论文章中医生作者署名的性别差异:一项观察性研究。

Quantifying gender disparity in physician authorship among commentary articles in three high-impact medical journals: an observational study.

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 25;10(2):e034056. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034056.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scholarship plays a direct role in career advancement, promotion and authoritative recognition, and women physicians remain under-represented as authors of original research articles.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if women physician authors are similarly under-represented in commentary articles within high-impact journals.

DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: In this observational study, we abstracted and analysed author information (gender and degree) and authorship position from commentary articles published in three high-impact journals between 1 January 2014 and 16 October 2018.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Authorship rate of commentary articles over a 5-year period by gender, degree, authorship position and journal.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

To compare the proportion of men and women physician authorship of commentaries relative to the proportion of men and women physician faculty within academic medicine; and to examine the gender concordance among the last and first authors in articles with more than one author.

RESULTS

Of the 2087 articles during the study period, 48% were men physician first authors compared with 17% women physician first authors (p<0.0001). Of the 1477 articles with more than one author, similar distributions were found with regard to last authors: 55% were men physicians compared with only 12% women physicians (p<0.0001). The proportion of women physician first authors increased over time; however, the proportion of women physician last authors remained stagnant. Women coauthored with women in the first and last authorship positions in 9% of articles. In contrast, women coauthored with men in the first and last author positions, respectively, in 55% of articles.

CONCLUSIONS

Women physician authors remain under-represented in commentary articles compared with men physician authors in the first and last author positions. Women also coauthored commentaries with other women in far fewer numbers.

摘要

背景

奖学金对职业发展、晋升和权威认可起着直接作用,而女性医师在原创研究文章的作者中仍所占比例不足。

目的

我们旨在确定女性医师作者在高影响力期刊的评论文章中是否同样代表性不足。

设计/环境/参与者:在这项观察性研究中,我们从 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 10 月 16 日期间,在三本高影响力期刊中抽取并分析了评论文章的作者信息(性别和学位)和作者位置。

主要结局测量

在 5 年期间,按性别、学位、作者位置和期刊划分的评论文章的作者比例。

次要结局测量

比较医学学术领域中男性和女性医师作者撰写评论文章的比例与男性和女性医师教员的比例;并检验有多位作者的文章中最后一位和第一位作者之间的性别一致性。

结果

在研究期间的 2087 篇文章中,男性医师第一作者占 48%,而女性医师第一作者仅占 17%(p<0.0001)。在 1477 篇有多位作者的文章中,最后一位作者的分布也相似:男性医生占 55%,而女性医生仅占 12%(p<0.0001)。女性医师第一作者的比例随时间增加而增加;然而,女性医师最后作者的比例保持不变。在 9%的文章中,女性作者在第一和最后作者位置上与其他女性共同撰写评论文章。相比之下,女性作者分别在第一和最后作者位置上与男性共同撰写评论文章的比例分别为 55%。

结论

与第一和最后作者位置的男性医师作者相比,女性医师作者在评论文章中仍代表性不足。女性作者在评论文章中与其他女性作者合作的情况也少得多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42a6/7044872/3a286ec6e56b/bmjopen-2019-034056f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验