Wang Mengxin, McGraw Paul, Ledgeway Timothy
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
Vision Res. 2019 Oct;163:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
The competitive and inhibitory interactions between the two eyes' images are a pervasive aspect of binocular vision. Over the last decade, our understanding of the neural processes underpinning binocular rivalry (BR) and continuous flash suppression (CFS) has increased substantially, but we still have little understanding of the relationship between these two effects and their variation in the general population. Studies that pool data across individuals and eyes risk masking substantial variations in binocular vision that exist in the general population. To investigate this issue we compared the depth of inter-ocular suppression evoked by BR with that elicited by CFS, in a group (N = 25) of visually normal individuals. A noise pattern (either static for BR or dynamic for CFS) was presented to one eye and its suppressive influence on a probe grating presented simultaneously to the other eye was measured. We found substantial individual differences in the magnitude of suppression (a 10-fold variation in probe detection threshold) evoked by each task, but performance on BR was a significant predictor of performance on the CFS task. However many individuals showed marked asymmetries between the two eyes' ability to detect a suppressed target, that were not necessarily the same for the two tasks. There was a tendency for the magnitude of the asymmetry to increase as the refresh rate of the dynamic noise increased. The results suggest a common underlying mechanism is likely to be responsible, at least in part, for driving inter-ocular suppression under BR and CFS. The marked asymmetries in inter-ocular suppression at higher noise refresh rates, may be indicative of a difference in temporal processing between the eyes.
双眼图像之间的竞争和抑制性相互作用是双眼视觉的一个普遍特征。在过去十年中,我们对支撑双眼竞争(BR)和持续闪光抑制(CFS)的神经过程的理解有了显著提高,但我们对这两种效应之间的关系及其在普通人群中的变化仍然知之甚少。汇总个体和双眼数据的研究可能会掩盖普通人群中存在的双眼视觉的巨大差异。为了研究这个问题,我们在一组视力正常的个体(N = 25)中比较了BR引起的眼间抑制深度与CFS引起的眼间抑制深度。向一只眼睛呈现噪声模式(BR为静态,CFS为动态),并测量其对同时呈现给另一只眼睛的探测光栅的抑制影响。我们发现每个任务引起的抑制幅度存在显著的个体差异(探测检测阈值有10倍的变化),但BR任务的表现是CFS任务表现的一个重要预测指标。然而,许多个体在双眼检测被抑制目标的能力上表现出明显的不对称,这两个任务的不对称情况不一定相同。随着动态噪声刷新率的增加,不对称程度有增加的趋势。结果表明,至少部分地,可能存在一个共同的潜在机制来驱动BR和CFS下的眼间抑制。在较高噪声刷新率下眼间抑制的明显不对称,可能表明双眼在时间处理上存在差异。