Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697-3957, USA.
Department of Psychological Science, Program in Public Health, and Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697-7085, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Sep;236:112341. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.046. Epub 2019 May 28.
Limited research has examined how combat veterans experience deaths of comrades to combat or suicide. We sought to investigate the process and identify factors that predict the level of grief among post-9/11 U.S. veterans.
Using a mixed-methods study design during 2016-2017, U.S. combat veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts who lost comrades to both combat and suicide (N = 28) participated in semi-structured interviews, and veterans who lost a comrade in combat or to suicide (N = 178) completed online surveys that assessed grief, combat exposure, unit cohesion, anger, posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), and past diagnoses of PTSD and depression.
Text analyses of interview transcripts revealed seven themes: 1) Suicide death is unexpected and can make acceptance of loss harder; 2) Combat death is expected and can ease acceptance of loss; 3) Combat death is heroic and can make acceptance of loss easier; 4) Brotherhood forged in combat intensifies the emotional response; 5) Guilt over the inability to prevent a comrade's death makes acceptance harder; 6) Attribution of blame for a death creates anger; and 7) Detachment from the civilian world may make it more difficult to cope with comrades' deaths. Regression analyses of survey data indicated: 1) suicide loss predicted non-acceptance of the loss; 2) mode of death moderated the association between unit cohesion and grief; 3) combat exposure, anger, closeness to the deceased, and having a past diagnosis of depression predicted the level of grief; and 4) combat exposure is a similarly strong predictor of grief and PTSS. Results highlight how veterans' grief further delineates war's toll.
The mixed-methods design tells a rich story about a previously unexplored consequence of war. These findings have important public health implications because outcomes impact not only veterans but also their families and communities.
有限的研究调查了参战退伍军人经历战友在战斗中牺牲或自杀的情况。我们试图研究这一过程并确定预测 9/11 后美国退伍军人悲痛程度的因素。
在 2016 年至 2017 年期间,我们采用混合方法研究设计,让经历过伊拉克和阿富汗冲突的美国参战退伍军人(因战斗或自杀而失去战友的退伍军人,N=28)参加半结构式访谈,让因战斗或自杀而失去战友的退伍军人(N=178)完成在线调查,调查内容包括悲痛、战斗暴露、单位凝聚力、愤怒、创伤后应激症状(PTSS)、过去 PTSD 和抑郁的诊断。
对访谈记录的文本分析揭示了七个主题:1)自杀死亡是出乎意料的,这使得接受失去战友的现实变得更加困难;2)战斗死亡是可以预料的,这可能使接受失去战友的现实变得更容易;3)战斗死亡是英勇的,这可能使接受失去战友的现实变得更容易;4)战斗中建立的兄弟情谊会加剧情感反应;5)因无法阻止战友死亡而产生的内疚感会使接受现实变得更加困难;6)对死亡的指责会引起愤怒;7)与平民世界的脱节可能使应对战友的死亡变得更加困难。对调查数据的回归分析表明:1)自杀死亡预测了对失去战友的不接受;2)死亡模式调节了单位凝聚力和悲痛之间的关系;3)战斗暴露、愤怒、与死者的亲近程度以及过去抑郁的诊断预测了悲痛程度;4)战斗暴露是悲痛和创伤后应激症状的一个同样强有力的预测因素。这些结果突出了退伍军人的悲痛如何进一步描述了战争的代价。
混合方法设计讲述了一个以前未被探索过的战争后果的丰富故事。这些发现具有重要的公共卫生意义,因为结果不仅影响退伍军人,还影响他们的家人和社区。