Suppr超能文献

不同类型运输介质存在或不存在时粪便样本中细菌肠道病原体的生存能力。

Viability of bacterial enteropathogens in fecal samples in the presence or absence of different types of transport media.

机构信息

Alberta Provincial Laboratory for Public Health, 3030 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 2B3; Alberta Public Laboratories, 3535 Research Rd. NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2L 2K8; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, 3535 Research Rd. NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2L 2K8.

Alberta Provincial Laboratory for Public Health, 3030 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 2B3.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;95(3):114862. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

Abstract

Transport media are recommended to improve the sensitivity of fecal culture, but there are limited published data comparing bacterial viability in feces stored with or without transport media. In this study, recovery of bacteria from culture-positive feces after 7 days of storage was assessed under the following conditions: without transport media (w/oTM); with FecalSwab™ Transport and Preservation Medium (FSTM); and with modified Cary-Blair (mCB). All Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) positive specimens (n = 23) and ≥97.5% of Salmonella-positive specimens (n = 40) remained positive under all conditions. Campylobacter (n = 41) was isolated from 82.9% of feces stored in mCB, 68.4% in FSTM, and 70.7% w/oTM; Shigella (n = 14) 85.7%, 78.6%, and 78.6%; and Yersinia (n = 16) 93.8%, 87.5%, and 81.3%, respectively (P = 0.076, Cochran's Q). Transport media were not required for STEC or Salmonella. mCB may be better than w/oTM or FSTM for other pathogens, but an evaluation with a larger number of specimens is required.

摘要

运输介质被推荐用于提高粪便培养的灵敏度,但关于在储存时使用或不使用运输介质的粪便中细菌活力的比较数据有限。在这项研究中,评估了在以下条件下储存 7 天后从培养阳性粪便中回收细菌的情况:不使用运输介质(w/oTM);使用 FecalSwab™ 运输和保存介质(FSTM);和改良的 Cary-Blair(mCB)。所有产志贺毒素的大肠杆菌(STEC)阳性标本(n=23)和≥97.5%的沙门氏菌阳性标本(n=40)在所有条件下均保持阳性。在 mCB 中储存的粪便中分离出 82.9%的弯曲杆菌(n=41)、68.4%的 FSTM 和 70.7%的 w/oTM;志贺菌(n=14)为 85.7%、78.6%和 78.6%;耶尔森菌(n=16)为 93.8%、87.5%和 81.3%(P=0.076,Cochran's Q)。STEC 或沙门氏菌不需要运输介质。mCB 可能优于 w/oTM 或 FSTM 用于其他病原体,但需要用更多的标本进行评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验