• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合利用管理计划-捆绑支付模式的实施及第 1 年和第 2 年结果比较。

The Joint Utilization Management Program-Implementation of a Bundle Payment Model and Comparison Between Year 1 and 2 Results.

机构信息

Musculoskeletal Institute of Excellence, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI.

Rehab Institute of Michigan, Department of Rehabilitation, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov;34(11):2532-2537. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.041. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.041
PMID:31375287
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care spending is projected to increase throughout the next decade alongside the number of total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) performed. Such growth places significant financial burden on the economic system. To address these concerns, Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) is becoming a favorable reimbursement model. The aim of this study is to present the outcomes with BPCI model focused on the post-acute care (PAC) phase and compare the outcomes between years 1 and 2 of implementation.

METHODS

The Joint Utilization Management Program (JUMP) was implemented in January 2014. Inclusion criteria were Medicare patients undergoing primary unilateral in-patient TJA procedures, outpatient procedures that resulted in an in-hospital admission, and trauma episodes that required TJA. Scorecards monitoring surgeons' performance and tracking length of stay (LOS) in the PAC setting were established. The data generated from these scorecards guided percentage sum-allocation from the total gain-shared sum among the participating providers.

RESULTS

A total of 683 JUMP patients were assessed over two years. PAC utilization decreased between 2014 and 2015. The average LOS was longer in year 1 than year 2 (4.50 vs 3.19 days). In-patient rehabilitation (IPR) decreased from 6.45% to 3.22%, with a decrease in IPR average LOS of 1.47 days. The rate of 30-day readmission was lower for JUMP patients in 2015 than 2014 (8.77% vs 10.56%), with day of readmission being earlier (11.91 days vs 13.71 days) in 2014.

CONCLUSION

Under the BPCI program, our experience with the JUMP model demonstrates higher efficiency of care in the PAC setting through reduced LOS, IPR admission rates, and 30-day readmission rate.

摘要

背景

预计在未来十年内,随着全关节置换术 (TJA) 总数的增加,医疗保健支出将增加。这种增长给经济系统带来了巨大的财务负担。为了解决这些问题,改善护理的捆绑支付 (BPCI) 正在成为一种有利的报销模式。本研究旨在介绍以 BPCI 模型为重点的急性后期护理 (PAC) 阶段的结果,并比较实施第 1 年和第 2 年的结果。

方法

联合利用管理计划 (JUMP) 于 2014 年 1 月实施。纳入标准为接受初次单侧住院 TJA 手术的 Medicare 患者、导致住院的门诊手术以及需要 TJA 的创伤发作。建立了监测外科医生绩效和跟踪 PAC 环境中住院时间 (LOS) 的记分卡。这些记分卡生成的数据指导了参与提供者之间从总收益共享总额中分配百分比总和。

结果

在两年内评估了 683 名 JUMP 患者。PAC 利用率在 2014 年至 2015 年期间下降。第 1 年的平均 LOS 长于第 2 年 (4.50 对 3.19 天)。住院康复 (IPR) 从 6.45%下降到 3.22%,IPR 平均 LOS 下降了 1.47 天。2015 年 JUMP 患者的 30 天再入院率低于 2014 年 (8.77%对 10.56%),再入院日更早 (11.91 天对 13.71 天)。

结论

在 BPCI 计划下,我们在 JUMP 模型方面的经验表明,通过减少 LOS、IPR 入院率和 30 天再入院率,PAC 环境中的护理效率更高。

相似文献

1
The Joint Utilization Management Program-Implementation of a Bundle Payment Model and Comparison Between Year 1 and 2 Results.联合利用管理计划-捆绑支付模式的实施及第 1 年和第 2 年结果比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov;34(11):2532-2537. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.041. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
2
Cost of Joint Replacement Using Bundled Payment Models.采用打包付费模式的关节置换成本。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):214-222. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8263.
3
Are Bundled Payments a Viable Reimbursement Model for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?捆绑支付是否是翻修全关节置换术可行的报销模式?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2714-2721. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4953-6. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
4
Post-Acute Care After Joint Replacement in Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative.医疗保险捆绑支付改善计划中关节置换术后的康复护理。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 May;67(5):1027-1035. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15803. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
5
Improvement in Total Joint Replacement Quality Metrics: Year One Versus Year Three of the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative.改善整体关节置换质量指标:支付改善护理计划捆绑包的第一年与第三年。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Dec 7;98(23):1949-1953. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00523.
6
Effect of Risk Acceptance for Bundled Care Payments on Clinical Outcomes in a High-Volume Total Joint Arthroplasty Practice After Implementation of a Standardized Clinical Pathway.标准化临床路径实施后,高容量全关节置换术实践中捆绑式护理支付的风险接受度对临床结果的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2332-2338. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
Bundled Payments for Care Improvement in the Private Sector: A Win for Everyone.私营部门改善护理捆绑支付:皆大欢喜。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2362-2367. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
8
The Association Between Hospital Length of Stay and 90-Day Readmission Risk Within a Total Joint Arthroplasty Bundled Payment Initiative.全关节置换捆绑支付计划中医院住院时间与90天再入院风险之间的关联。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):714-718. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Bundled Payments Are Effective in Reducing Costs Following Bilateral Total Joint Arthroplasty.双侧全关节置换术后捆绑式支付可有效降低成本。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1317-1321.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.041. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
10
The Implications of Aging Population Demographics on the Delivery of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in a Bundled Payment System.人口老龄化对按打包付费制施行初次全关节置换术的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Oct 7;102(19):1679-1686. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01264.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Among an Underserved Population: Lessons Learned From a Quality-Improvement Initiative.在服务不足人群中优化全髋关节和膝关节置换术:质量改进计划的经验教训
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jun 18;28:101443. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101443. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Strategies for utilisation management of hospital services: a systematic review of interventions.医院服务利用管理策略:干预措施的系统评价。
Global Health. 2022 May 23;18(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00835-3.
3
Specialized Medical Weight Management Intervention for High-Risk Obesity.
针对高危肥胖的专业医学体重管理干预措施。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2021 Jul 1;8(2):1-5. doi: 10.36469/001c.24896. eCollection 2021.
4
Economic Recovery After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Resuming Elective Orthopedic Surgery and Total Joint Arthroplasty.新冠疫情后经济复苏:恢复择期骨科手术和全关节置换术。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7S):S32-S36. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.038. Epub 2020 Apr 18.