• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深度学习在对比增强磁共振成像上鉴别胰腺疾病的性能:一项初步研究。

Performance of deep learning for differentiating pancreatic diseases on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A preliminary study.

机构信息

Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032 Shanghai, China; Department of Interventional Radiology, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, 200032 Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032 Shanghai, China; Department of Interventional Radiology, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, 200032 Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Feb;101(2):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.diii.2019.07.002
PMID:31375430
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of deep learning to differentiate pancreatic diseases on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images with the aid of generative adversarial network (GAN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 504 patients who underwent T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR examinations before any treatments were included in this retrospective study. First, the MRI examinations of 398 patients (215 men, 183 women; mean age, 59.14±12.07 [SD] years [range: 16-85 years]) from one hospital were used as the training set. Then the MRI examinations of 50 (26 men, 24women; mean age, 58.58±13.64 [SD] years [range: 24-85 years]) and 56 (30 men, 26 women; mean age, 59.13±11.35 [SD] years [range: 26-80 years]) consecutive patients from two hospitals were separately collected as the internal and external validation sets. An InceptionV4 network was trained on the training set augmented by synthetic images from GANs. Classification performance of trained InceptionV4 network for every patch and every patient were made on both validation sets, respectively. The prediction agreement between convolutional neural network (CNN) and radiologist was measured by the Cohen's kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

The patch-level average accuracy and the micro-averaging area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of InceptionV4 network were 71.56% and 0.9204 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9165-0.9308) for the internal validation set, and 79.46% and 0.9451 (95%CI: 0.9320-0.9523) for the external validation set, respectively. The patient-level average accuracy and the micro-averaging AUC of InceptionV4 network were 70.00% and 0.8250 (95%CI: 0.8147-0.8326) for the internal validation, 76.79% and 0.8646 (95%CI: 0.8489-0.8772) for the external validation set, respectively. Evaluated by human reader, the average accuracy and micro-averaging AUC for internal and external validation sets were 82.00% and 0.8950 (95%CI: 0.8817-0.9083), 83.93% and 0.9063 (95%CI: 0.8968-0.9212), respectively. The Cohen's kappa coefficients between InceptionV4 network and human reader for the internal and external invalidation sets were 0.8339 (95%CI: 0.6991-0.9447) and 0.8862 (95%CI: 0.7759-0.9738), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Deep learning using CNN and GAN had the potential to differentiate pancreatic diseases on contrast-enhanced MR images.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估深度学习在基于生成对抗网络(GAN)的对比增强磁共振(MR)图像辅助下区分胰腺疾病的能力。

材料和方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 504 例在任何治疗前均行 T1 加权对比增强 MR 检查的患者。首先,使用来自一家医院的 398 例患者(215 名男性,183 名女性;平均年龄 59.14±12.07[标准差]岁[范围:16-85 岁])的 MRI 检查作为训练集。然后,分别收集来自两家医院的 50 例(26 名男性,24 名女性;平均年龄 58.58±13.64[标准差]岁[范围:24-85 岁])和 56 例(30 名男性,26 名女性;平均年龄 59.13±11.35[标准差]岁[范围:26-80 岁])连续患者的 MRI 检查作为内部和外部验证集。基于训练集和 GAN 生成的合成图像,对 InceptionV4 网络进行训练。分别在两个验证集上对训练后的 InceptionV4 网络进行每个补丁和每个患者的分类性能评估。采用 Cohen's kappa 系数衡量 CNN 与放射科医生之间的预测一致性。

结果

InceptionV4 网络在内部验证集的每个补丁和每个患者的平均准确率和微平均受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积分别为 71.56%和 0.9204(95%置信区间[CI]:0.9165-0.9308),在外部验证集的平均准确率和微平均 AUC 分别为 79.46%和 0.9451(95%CI:0.9320-0.9523)。InceptionV4 网络在内部验证的每个患者和每个患者的平均准确率和微平均 AUC 分别为 70.00%和 0.8250(95%CI:0.8147-0.8326),在外部验证的平均准确率和微平均 AUC 分别为 76.79%和 0.8646(95%CI:0.8489-0.8772)。经人类读者评估,内部和外部验证集的平均准确率和微平均 AUC 分别为 82.00%和 0.8950(95%CI:0.8817-0.9083),83.93%和 0.9063(95%CI:0.8968-0.9212)。InceptionV4 网络与人类读者在内部和外部验证集的 Cohen's kappa 系数分别为 0.8339(95%CI:0.6991-0.9447)和 0.8862(95%CI:0.7759-0.9738)。

结论

使用 CNN 和 GAN 的深度学习有潜力在对比增强 MR 图像上区分胰腺疾病。

相似文献

1
Performance of deep learning for differentiating pancreatic diseases on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A preliminary study.深度学习在对比增强磁共振成像上鉴别胰腺疾病的性能:一项初步研究。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Feb;101(2):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Deep learning for World Health Organization grades of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images: a preliminary study.深度学习在对比增强磁共振图像上对世界卫生组织胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤分级的初步研究。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Nov;14(11):1981-1991. doi: 10.1007/s11548-019-02070-5. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
3
Deep Learning Model for Automated Detection and Classification of Central Canal, Lateral Recess, and Neural Foraminal Stenosis at Lumbar Spine MRI.深度学习模型在腰椎 MRI 中用于自动检测和分类中央管、侧隐窝和神经孔狭窄
Radiology. 2021 Jul;300(1):130-138. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204289. Epub 2021 May 11.
4
Deep-learning-assisted diagnosis for knee magnetic resonance imaging: Development and retrospective validation of MRNet.深度学习辅助膝关节磁共振成像诊断:MRNet 的开发和回顾性验证。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 27;15(11):e1002699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002699. eCollection 2018 Nov.
5
A Deep Convolutional Neural Network With Performance Comparable to Radiologists for Differentiating Between Spinal Schwannoma and Meningioma.一种深度学习卷积神经网络,其性能可与放射科医生媲美,可用于区分脊髓神经鞘瘤和脑膜瘤。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 15;45(10):694-700. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003353.
6
Deep learning to differentiate parkinsonian disorders separately using single midsagittal MR imaging: a proof of concept study.利用单矢状面 MRI 对帕金森病进行深度学习区分:概念验证研究。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec;29(12):6891-6899. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06327-0. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
7
Deep learning to distinguish pancreatic cancer tissue from non-cancerous pancreatic tissue: a retrospective study with cross-racial external validation.深度学习区分胰腺癌组织与非癌胰腺组织:一项具有跨种族外部验证的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jun;2(6):e303-e313. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30078-9.
8
Development and Preliminary Validation of a Novel Convolutional Neural Network Model for Predicting Treatment Response in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy.开发和初步验证一种用于预测接受肝动脉灌注化疗的不可切除肝细胞癌患者治疗反应的新型卷积神经网络模型。
J Imaging Inform Med. 2024 Aug;37(4):1282-1296. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01003-2. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
9
Deep learning approaches using 2D and 3D convolutional neural networks for generating male pelvic synthetic computed tomography from magnetic resonance imaging.使用 2D 和 3D 卷积神经网络从磁共振成像生成男性骨盆合成 CT 的深度学习方法。
Med Phys. 2019 Sep;46(9):3788-3798. doi: 10.1002/mp.13672. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
10
Convolutional neural network-based magnetic resonance image differentiation of filum terminale ependymomas from schwannomas.基于卷积神经网络的马尾神经室管膜瘤与神经鞘瘤的磁共振图像鉴别。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12023-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining multimodal medical imaging and artificial intelligence for the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.结合多模态医学成像与人工智能用于胰腺癌的早期诊断。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 8;12:1631671. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1631671. eCollection 2025.
2
Artificial intelligence in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm imaging: A systematic review.人工智能在胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤成像中的应用:一项系统综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jul 23;4(7):e0000920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000920. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Imaging: A Systematic Review.
人工智能在胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤成像中的应用:一项系统综述
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 9:2025.01.08.25320130. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.08.25320130.
4
AI-powered innovations in pancreatitis imaging: a comprehensive literature synthesis.人工智能驱动的胰腺炎成像创新:一项全面的文献综述
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan;50(1):438-452. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04512-4. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
5
Computer-Aided Detection for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: Radiological Challenges and Future Directions.用于胰腺癌诊断的计算机辅助检测:放射学挑战与未来方向
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 22;12(13):4209. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134209.
6
Normalization Strategies in Multi-Center Radiomics Abdominal MRI: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.多中心腹部MRI影像组学中的标准化策略:系统评价与荟萃分析
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2023 Apr 28;4:67-76. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3271455. eCollection 2023.
7
Pancreatic Mass Characterization Using IVIM-DKI MRI and Machine Learning-Based Multi-Parametric Texture Analysis.使用体素内不相干运动扩散峰度成像磁共振成像(IVIM-DKI MRI)和基于机器学习的多参数纹理分析对胰腺肿块进行特征描述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jan 8;10(1):83. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010083.
8
Enhancing cancer differentiation with synthetic MRI examinations via generative models: a systematic review.通过生成模型利用合成磁共振成像检查增强癌症分化:一项系统综述
Insights Imaging. 2022 Dec 12;13(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01315-3.
9
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer.人工智能驱动的胰腺癌诊断
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 31;14(21):5382. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215382.
10
Artificial intelligence in lung cancer: current applications and perspectives.人工智能在肺癌中的应用:现状与展望。
Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Mar;41(3):235-244. doi: 10.1007/s11604-022-01359-x. Epub 2022 Nov 9.