UMET, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Lille, 59650 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
UMET, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Lille, 59650 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019 Oct 1;182:110398. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110398. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
The current experimental study investigates the influence of latex microsphere particles' size on the assessment of their hydrophilic/hydrophobic character, using the method known as "Microbial Adhesion to Hydrocarbons" (MATH). Since bacteria surfaces often change according to the environment in which they find themselves, most of the experiments here were carried out using the calibrated latex microspheres Polybeads® and Yellow-green Fluoresbrite® (Polyscience) microspheres with diameters between 0.2 μm and 4.5 μm. All the beads had a density of ˜1.05 g/cm. The first set of experiments was performed to adapt the procedure for measurements of water contact angles to microsphere lawns. It was found that all the microspheres tested were hydrophobic, when using a water contact angle of around 110-118°. However, wide differences were observed using the MATH method. The smaller microspheres (0.2 μm, 0.5 μm +/- 0.75 μm) exhibited a poor affinity to hexadecane, even after long contact times, suggesting a hydrophilic character. In contrast, larger microspheres quickly adhered to hexadecane, which is consistent with the values obtained for the water contact angles observed. These results suggest that, at least where hydrophobic particles are concerned, the MATH method is not suitable for the assessment of the hydrophobic character of particles with diameters of less than 1.0 μm. We lastly investigated whether the data obtained for Bacillus spores could also be affected by spore size. The hydrophobicity of spores of eight Bacillus strains was analysed by both MATH and contact angle. Some discrepancies were observed between both methods but could not be related their size (length or width).
当前的实验研究使用“微生物对烃类的粘附”(MATH)方法,调查了乳胶微球颗粒大小对评估其亲水性/疏水性特征的影响。由于细菌表面通常会根据其所处的环境而变化,因此这里的大多数实验都是使用校准的乳胶微球 Polybeads®和 Yellow-green Fluoresbrite®(Polyscience)微球进行的,直径在 0.2μm 和 4.5μm 之间。所有珠子的密度约为 1.05g/cm。第一组实验旨在适应微球草坪水接触角测量的程序。结果发现,当使用约 110-118°的水接触角时,所有测试的微球均为疏水性。但是,使用 MATH 方法观察到了很大的差异。较小的微球(0.2μm、0.5μm±0.75μm)即使在长时间接触后,对十六烷的亲和力也很差,表明具有亲水性。相比之下,较大的微球很快就会粘附到十六烷上,这与观察到的水接触角值一致。这些结果表明,至少在疏水性颗粒的情况下,MATH 方法不适合评估直径小于 1.0μm 的颗粒的疏水性。我们最后研究了 MATH 方法是否也会影响芽孢杆菌孢子的数据。通过 MATH 和接触角分析了八种芽孢杆菌菌株的孢子的疏水性。两种方法之间观察到一些差异,但无法将其与大小(长度或宽度)相关联。