• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国内研发、技术获取、技术同化与中国工业碳强度:基于动态面板门槛模型的证据。

Domestic R&D, technology acquisition, technology assimilation and China's industrial carbon intensity: Evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model.

机构信息

School of Economics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 25;693:133436. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.242. Epub 2019 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.242
PMID:31377352
Abstract

Carbon emissions generated by China's industrial sectors-a result of rapid industrialization and extensive use of coal-have raised the Chinese government's concerns. In this study, we use a panel dataset representing China's industrial sectors over 2000-2010 to analyze the effect of domestic R&D, technology acquisition, and technology assimilation on China's industrial carbon intensity using both linear and non-linear analysis. Conventional dynamic panel regression analyses based on the difference generalized method of moments and system generalized method of moments are employed. The estimation results imply that domestic R&D activities and technology acquisition from domestic and abroad are conducive to reducing carbon intensity. Since the effect of technology acquisition on carbon intensity may be determined by technology assimilation factors, further investigation based on dynamic panel threshold model is conducted. The results of the dynamic panel threshold model indicate that technology assimilation factors, such as domestic R&D and market openness level, are crucial determinants of the level of industrial carbon intensity.

摘要

中国工业部门的碳排放——这是快速工业化和广泛使用煤炭的结果——引起了中国政府的关注。在本研究中,我们使用了一个代表中国工业部门 2000-2010 年的面板数据集,采用线性和非线性分析方法,分析了国内研发、技术获取和技术吸收对中国工业碳强度的影响。我们使用了基于差分广义矩方法和系统广义矩方法的传统动态面板回归分析。估计结果表明,国内研发活动和从国内外获取的技术都有利于降低碳强度。由于技术获取对碳强度的影响可能取决于技术吸收因素,因此我们进一步基于动态面板门槛模型进行了调查。动态面板门槛模型的结果表明,国内研发和市场开放水平等技术吸收因素是工业碳强度水平的重要决定因素。

相似文献

1
Domestic R&D, technology acquisition, technology assimilation and China's industrial carbon intensity: Evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model.国内研发、技术获取、技术同化与中国工业碳强度:基于动态面板门槛模型的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 25;693:133436. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.242. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
2
The influences of openness on China's industrial CO intensity.开放性对中国工业 CO 强度的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(13):15743-15757. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08086-8. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
3
Convergence analysis of China's energy intensity at the industrial sector level.中国工业部门能源强度的收敛分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Mar;26(8):7730-7742. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3994-7. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
4
Towards carbon neutrality: The role of different paths of technological progress in mitigating China's CO emissions.迈向碳中和:不同技术进步路径在缓解中国 CO 排放方面的作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 20;813:152588. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152588. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
5
Decreasing China's carbon intensity through research and development activities.通过研发活动降低中国的碳强度。
Environ Res. 2020 Nov;190:109947. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109947. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
6
The role of domestic R&D activities played in carbon intensity: Evidence from China.国内研发活动在碳强度方面的作用:来自中国的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 15;708:135033. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135033. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
7
China's pilot emissions trading schemes and competitiveness: An empirical analysis of the provincial industrial sub-sectors.中国的试点排放交易计划与竞争力:省级工业子行业的实证分析。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Mar 15;258:109997. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109997. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
8
Does environmental decentralization exacerbate China's carbon emissions? Evidence based on dynamic threshold effect analysis.环境分权是否加剧了中国的碳排放?基于动态门槛效应分析的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 15;721:137656. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137656. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
9
Determining the factors driving China's industrial energy intensity: Evidence from technological innovation sources and structural change.确定推动中国工业能源强度的因素:来自技术创新来源和结构变化的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 1;737:139767. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139767. Epub 2020 May 29.
10
The convergence characteristics of China's carbon intensity: Evidence from a dynamic spatial panel approach.中国碳强度的收敛特征:基于动态空间面板方法的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 10;668:685-695. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.413. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovation or acquisition? Emissions mitigation strategies and the role of renewable technologies.创新还是收购?减排策略与可再生技术的作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0316020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316020. eCollection 2024.
2
Carbon emission reduction effects of renewable energy technological innovation in China: New insights into the intellectual property rights protection.中国可再生能源技术创新的碳排放减少效应:知识产权保护新见解
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 9;9(9):e19836. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19836. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Threshold effects of green technology application on sustainable grain production: Evidence from China.
绿色技术应用对可持续粮食生产的阈值效应:来自中国的证据
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 30;14:1107970. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1107970. eCollection 2023.
4
The environmental effects of the "twin" green and digital transition in European regions.欧洲地区“绿色”与数字“双转型”的环境影响。
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2023;84(4):877-918. doi: 10.1007/s10640-022-00741-7. Epub 2022 Dec 9.