Suppr超能文献

认知行为疗法治疗失眠对客观睡眠参数的影响:荟萃分析和系统评价。

The impact of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia on objective sleep parameters: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

机构信息

Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Sleep Med Rev. 2019 Oct;47:90-102. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

Abstract

It is well-established that cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) improves self-reported sleep disturbance, however the impact on objective sleep is less clear. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the impact of multi-component CBT-I on objective measures of sleep, indexed via polysomnography (PSG) and actigraphy. Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria. Following appraisal for risk of bias, extracted data were meta-analysed using random-effects models. The quality of the literature was generally high, although reporting of methodological detail varied markedly between studies. Meta-analyses found no evidence that CBT-I reliably improves PSG-defined sleep parameters. Actigraphy evidence was more mixed; with a small effect for reduction in sleep onset latency (Hedge's g = -0.28 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.51 to -0.05], p = 0.018) and a moderate effect for reduction in total sleep time (TST) (Hedge's g = -0.51 [95% CI -0.75 to -0.26], p < 0.001). In contrast, and consistent with recent meta-analyses, CBT-I was associated with robust improvements in diary measures of sleep initiation and maintenance (Hedge's g range = 0.50 to 0.79) but not TST. While the literature is small and still developing, the sleep benefits of CBT-I are more clearly expressed in the subjective versus objective domain.

摘要

已有充分证据表明,认知行为疗法治疗失眠症(CBT-I)可改善自我报告的睡眠障碍,但对客观睡眠的影响则不太明确。本荟萃分析旨在定量评估多组分 CBT-I 对多导睡眠图(PSG)和活动记录仪等客观睡眠测量指标的影响。有 15 项研究符合纳入标准。在评估偏倚风险后,使用随机效应模型对提取的数据进行荟萃分析。文献质量总体较高,但研究之间的方法细节报告差异很大。荟萃分析并未发现 CBT-I 能可靠改善 PSG 定义的睡眠参数的证据。活动记录仪的证据则更为混杂;入睡潜伏期的缩短(Hedge's g=-0.28 [95%置信区间(CI)-0.51 至-0.05],p=0.018)和总睡眠时间(TST)的减少(Hedge's g=-0.51 [95% CI-0.75 至-0.26],p<0.001)有较小和中等效应。相比之下,与最近的荟萃分析一致,CBT-I 与睡眠起始和维持的日记测量指标的显著改善相关(Hedge's g 范围为 0.50 至 0.79),但与 TST 无关。尽管文献规模较小且仍在不断发展,但 CBT-I 的睡眠益处更明显地表现在主观而非客观领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验