Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e029220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029220.
The rapid increase in apartment construction in Australia has raised concerns about the impacts of poorly designed and located buildings on resident health and well-being. While apartment design policies exist, their content varies across jurisdictions and evidence on their impact on health and well-being is lacking. This cross-sectional observational study (2017-2021) aims to generate empirical evidence to guide policy decisions on apartment development and help to create healthy, equitable higher-density communities. Objectives include to benchmark the implementation of health-promoting apartment design requirements and to identify associations between requirements and resident health and well-being outcomes.
Eligible buildings in three Australian cities with different apartment design guidelines will be stratified by area disadvantage and randomly selected (n=99). Building architects, developers and local governments will be approached to provide endorsed development plans from which apartment and building design features will be extracted. Additional data collection includes a resident survey (n=1000) to assess environmental stressors and health and well-being impacts and outcomes, and geographic information systems measures of the neighbourhood. The study has 85% power to detect a difference of 0.5 SD in the primary outcome of mental well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) at a 5% level of significance. Analyses will compare policy compliance and health-promoting design features between cities and area disadvantage groups. Regression models will test whether higher policy compliance (overall and by design theme) is associated with better health and well-being, and the relative contribution of the neighbourhood context.
Human Research Ethics Committees of RMIT University (CHEAN B 21146-10/17) and the University of Western Australia (RA/4/1/8735) approved the study protocol. In addition to academic publications, the collaboration will develop specific health-promoting indicators to embed into the monitoring of apartment design policy implementation and impact, and co-design research dissemination materials to facilitate uptake by decision makers.
澳大利亚公寓建设的快速增长引发了人们对设计不佳和位置不当的建筑对居民健康和福祉的影响的担忧。虽然存在公寓设计政策,但它们的内容因司法管辖区而异,而且缺乏关于它们对健康和福祉影响的证据。这项横断面观察性研究(2017-2021 年)旨在提供指导公寓开发政策决策的实证证据,并帮助创建健康、公平的高密度社区。研究目的包括为健康促进型公寓设计要求的实施情况设定基准,并确定这些要求与居民健康和福祉结果之间的关联。
将按地区劣势分层,并随机选择澳大利亚三个城市(n=99)的符合条件的建筑物。将与建筑设计师、开发商和地方政府联系,以获取认可的开发计划,从中提取公寓和建筑设计特征。其他数据收集包括对 1000 名居民进行调查,以评估环境压力源和健康与福祉的影响和结果,以及邻里的地理信息系统测量。该研究具有 85%的功效,可在 5%的显著水平上检测到主要结局(沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表)心理健康的 0.5 标准差差异。分析将比较城市和地区劣势组之间的政策合规性和促进健康的设计特征。回归模型将测试更高的政策合规性(整体和按设计主题)是否与更好的健康和福祉相关,以及邻里环境的相对贡献。
皇家墨尔本理工大学(CHEAN B 21146-10/17)和西澳大利亚大学(RA/4/1/8735)的人类研究伦理委员会批准了该研究方案。除了学术出版物外,该合作还将开发特定的促进健康的指标,以纳入公寓设计政策实施和影响的监测,并共同设计研究传播材料,以方便决策者采用。