Department of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, 1120 Lianhua Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518036, Guangdong, China.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Dec;27(12):3997-4004. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05648-3. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
The study aimed to compare modified arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation (MASA) with tenodesis of the upper third of the subscapularis tendon using a tendon combined with capsulolabral reconstruction (Group A) or Bankart repair (Group B) for recurrent anterior shoulder instability (RASI).
A retrospective series of 49 patients underwent primary surgery for RASI with glenoid bone loss (GBL) < 25%. Outcomes included the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Rowe score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) functional outcome scale score. Recurrent instability, sports activity level, and range of motion (ROM) were also analysed.
No significant differences were observed at baseline. Forty-six patients were available for more than 2 years of follow-up. At the last follow-up after surgery, the patients in both groups had experienced significant improvements in all outcome scores (P < 0.05 for all), and obvious decreases in forward flexion and external rotation were noted in both groups (P < 0.05 for all). Group A had superior ASES scores, VAS scores, and OSISs (P < 0.05) but did not experience significant differences in either the Rowe score or ROM compared to Group B. Group A had lower rates of recurrent instability and superior outcomes for the return to sports activities. One patient in Group A had subluxation, and 4 patients in Group B had dislocation or subluxation. No patients in either group experienced neurovascular injury, joint stiffness, or surgical wound infection.
For RASI with GBL < 25%, MASA with tenodesis of the upper third of the subscapularis tendon using a tendon combined with capsulolabral reconstruction was a safe technique that produced better outcomes in terms of ASES scores, VAS scores, OSISs, the return to sports, and postoperative recurrent instability and did not decrease the ROM compared to that achieved by arthroscopic Bankart repair.
III.
本研究旨在比较改良关节镜下肩胛下肌修补术(MASA)与肩胛下肌上 1/3 腱骨结合加关节囊盂唇重建(A 组)或 Bankart 修复(B 组)治疗伴盂肱骨缺损(GBL)<25%的复发性肩关节前不稳定(RASI)的疗效。
回顾性分析 49 例接受初次手术治疗伴 GBL<25%的 RASI 患者的临床资料,其中 A 组采用改良肩胛下肌修补术,B 组采用 Bankart 修复术。随访评估包括牛津肩关节不稳定评分(OSIS)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Rowe 评分及美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)功能评分。分析术后复发、运动水平及活动范围(ROM)。
所有患者均获得随访,随访时间>2 年。末次随访时,两组患者的所有评分均较术前明显改善(P<0.05),两组患者的前屈和外旋 ROM 均较术前明显减小(P<0.05)。A 组患者的 ASES 评分、VAS 评分和 OSIS 评分均优于 B 组(P<0.05),但 Rowe 评分和 ROM 比较差异无统计学意义。A 组的复发率及重返运动比例均优于 B 组。A 组 1 例患者出现半脱位,B 组 4 例患者出现脱位或半脱位。两组患者均未出现神经血管损伤、关节僵硬或手术切口感染。
对于伴 GBL<25%的 RASI,改良肩胛下肌修补术联合肩胛下肌上 1/3 腱骨结合加关节囊盂唇重建是一种安全有效的方法,与 Bankart 修复术相比,其在 ASES 评分、VAS 评分、OSIS 评分、重返运动和术后复发性不稳定等方面具有更好的疗效,且不影响 ROM。
III 级。