Department of Neurosurgery and Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Oct;161(10):1993-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04001-4. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
Common carotid artery occlusion (CCA-occlusion) is a rare condition where standard revascularization is not feasible. Here, we analyzed our experience with surgical revascularization of CCA-occlusion to develop an algorithm for selection of the most suitable bypass strategy according to the Riles classification.
During a 10-year period, 16 out of 288 patients with cerebrovascular disease and compromised hemodynamic reserve underwent revascularization for unilateral CCA-occlusion. The utilized bypass strategies included (1) a saphenous vein graft from the subclavian artery (SA) to the internal carotid artery (ICA), (2) a radial artery graft from the V3 segment of the vertebral artery (VA) to a superficial branch of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), or (3) a saphenous vein graft from the SA to a deep branch of the MCA.
In CCA-occlusion with maintained external carotid artery (ECA)/ICA patency (Riles type 1A), an SA-ICA bypass was performed (25%). In cases without ECA/ICA patency (Riles type 1B or 2) but suitable VA, a VA-MCA bypass was grafted (31%). In cases with unsuitable VA, a long SA-MCA interposition bypass was performed (38%). Transient postoperative neurological deficits occurred in 5 patients (31%) with 1 patient (6%) suffering permanent neurological worsening and 1 mortality (6%). Overall, no difference was found between the median preoperative mRS (2; range, 1-4) and the mRS at the time point of the last follow-up (2; range, 1-6; p = 0.75). The long-term graft patency was 94%.
Although surgical revascularization for CCA-occlusion is feasible, it is associated with a higher risk than standard bypass grafting. Considering the poor natural history of CCA-occlusion, however, this risk may be justified in carefully selected patients.
颈总动脉闭塞(CCA 闭塞)是一种罕见的情况,标准的血运重建不可行。在这里,我们分析了我们在 CCA 闭塞手术血运重建方面的经验,根据 Riles 分类制定了选择最合适旁路策略的算法。
在 10 年期间,288 例脑血管疾病伴血流动力学储备受损的患者中有 16 例接受了单侧 CCA 闭塞的血运重建。所采用的旁路策略包括:(1)从锁骨下动脉(SA)到颈内动脉(ICA)的隐静脉移植;(2)从椎动脉(VA)V3 段到大脑中动脉(MCA)浅表分支的桡动脉移植;(3)从 SA 到 MCA 深支的隐静脉移植。
在颈总动脉保留颈外动脉(ECA)/颈内动脉通畅的 CCA 闭塞(Riles 1A 型)中,进行了 SA-ICA 旁路移植(25%)。在 ECA/ICA 无通畅(Riles 1B 或 2 型)但 VA 合适的情况下,进行了 VA-MCA 旁路移植(31%)。在 VA 不合适的情况下,进行了长隐静脉-MCA 间置旁路移植(38%)。5 例(31%)患者术后出现短暂性神经功能缺损,其中 1 例(6%)患者出现永久性神经恶化,1 例(6%)患者死亡。总的来说,中位术前 mRS(2;范围,1-4)与最后一次随访时的 mRS(2;范围,1-6;p=0.75)之间无差异。长期移植物通畅率为 94%。
虽然 CCA 闭塞的手术血运重建是可行的,但与标准旁路移植相比,其风险更高。然而,考虑到 CCA 闭塞的不良自然史,在仔细选择的患者中,这种风险可能是合理的。