• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科癌症患者的死亡地点按地区和城市化程度划分:2006-2016 年。

Place of death by region and urbanization among gynecologic cancer patients: 2006-2016.

机构信息

Duke University Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Durham, NC, United States of America.

Duke Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Durham, NC, United States of America.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Oct;155(1):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.013
PMID:31378375
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate associations between US region of residence and urbanization and the place of death among women with gynecologic malignancies in the United States.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed using publicly available death certificate data from the National Center for Health Statistics. All gynecologic cancer deaths were included from 2006 to 2016. Comparisons among categories were performed with a two-tailed chi-square test, with p-values <0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

From 2006 to 2016, 328,026 women died from gynecologic malignancies in the US. Of these deaths, 40.1% (n = 134,333) occurred in the patient's home, 24.9%(n = 81,823) in the hospital, and 11.3% (37,188) in an inpatient hospice facility. Place of death varied by geographic region. The Northeast had the largest percentage of gynecologic cancer patients (31.3%) die as a hospital inpatient. The West had the highest percentage of deaths (49.3%) at home. Deaths in a hospice facility were the highest (14.1%) in the South. Place of death varied by urbanization; patients residing in large central metro or rural counties were the most likely to die during hospital admission (28.7% and 27.1%, respectively). Patients living in medium-sized metro areas were the least likely to die in hospitals (21.8%) and most likely to die in a hospice facility (14.3%). All comparisons were significant by study definition.

CONCLUSION

The place of death for patients with gynecologic malignancies varies by US region and urbanization. These disparities are multifactorial in nature, likely influenced by both sociodemographic factors and regional resource availability. In this study, however, rural and central metro areas are identified as regions that may benefit from further hospice development and advocacy.

摘要

目的

评估美国女性妇科恶性肿瘤患者的居住地区和城市化与死亡地点之间的关联。

方法

本研究采用美国国家卫生统计中心公开的死亡证明数据,进行回顾性的横截面研究。纳入了 2006 年至 2016 年期间所有的妇科癌症死亡病例。采用双侧卡方检验对各分类进行比较,p 值<0.05 认为具有统计学意义。

结果

2006 年至 2016 年期间,美国有 328,026 名女性死于妇科恶性肿瘤。其中,40.1%(n=134,333)死于家中,24.9%(n=81,823)死于医院,11.3%(n=37,188)死于住院临终关怀机构。死亡地点因地理位置而异。东北地区的妇科癌症患者(31.3%)中有最大比例的人在医院住院期间死亡。西部地区在家中死亡的比例最高(49.3%)。在南方,临终关怀机构的死亡比例最高(14.1%)。死亡地点也因城市化程度而异;居住在大中城市中心或农村县的患者最有可能在住院期间死亡(分别为 28.7%和 27.1%)。居住在中等规模城市地区的患者在医院死亡的可能性最小(21.8%),在临终关怀机构死亡的可能性最大(14.3%)。根据研究定义,所有比较均具有统计学意义。

结论

妇科恶性肿瘤患者的死亡地点因美国地区和城市化程度而异。这些差异是多方面的,可能受到社会人口因素和区域资源可用性的影响。然而,在这项研究中,农村和中心城市地区被确定为可能受益于进一步发展临终关怀和倡导的地区。

相似文献

1
Place of death by region and urbanization among gynecologic cancer patients: 2006-2016.妇科癌症患者的死亡地点按地区和城市化程度划分:2006-2016 年。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Oct;155(1):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
2
Trends in Place of Death Among Patients With Gynecologic Cancer in the United States.美国妇科癌症患者死亡地点趋势。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;131(6):1111-1120. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002614.
3
Urban-rural differences in pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011-2016.城乡间与妊娠相关的死亡差异,美国,2011-2016 年。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):183.e1-183.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.028. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
4
Rural-urban difference in female breast cancer diagnosis in Missouri.密苏里州女性乳腺癌诊断的城乡差异。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):3063. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
5
Infant mortality rate inequalities in the Western Cape Province of South Africa.南非西开普省的婴儿死亡率不平等现象。
Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Oct;25(5):966-72. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.5.966.
6
Asthma Surveillance - United States, 2006-2018.哮喘监测 - 美国,2006-2018 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 Sep 17;70(5):1-32. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7005a1.
7
Assessment of Racial Disparities in Mortality Rates Among Older Adults Living in US Rural vs Urban Counties From 1968 to 2016.评估 1968 年至 2016 年美国农村与城市县老年人死亡率的种族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012241. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12241.
8
Excess deaths associated with COVID-19 by rurality and demographic factors in the United States.美国农村和人口因素与 COVID-19 相关的超额死亡人数。
J Rural Health. 2024 Jun;40(3):491-499. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12815. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
9
Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: a national population-based study in England, UK.城乡间获得临终关怀和生命终末期(PEoLC)机构和死亡地点的地理可达性的差异:英国英格兰全国性基于人群的研究。
Int J Health Geogr. 2019 May 6;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12942-019-0172-1.
10
Regional variations in geographic access to inpatient hospices and Place of death: A Population-based study in England, UK.区域差异对住院临终关怀和死亡地点的地理可达性:英国基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 17;15(4):e0231666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231666. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting the place of death in patients with liver cancer in China, 2013-2020: A population-based study.2013 - 2020年中国肝癌患者死亡地点的影响因素:一项基于人群的研究
Cancer Pathog Ther. 2024 Apr 12;3(2):163-172. doi: 10.1016/j.cpt.2024.04.001. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
The congruence between the preferred and actual places of death among terminal cancer patients in China.中国晚期癌症患者死亡意愿地点与实际死亡地点的一致性。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 10;15:1382272. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382272. eCollection 2024.
3
Trends in Location of Death for Individuals With Ovarian Cancer in the United States.
美国卵巢癌患者死亡地点的趋势。
Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan 1;143(1):101-103. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005439. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
4
Availability of family care resources, type of primary caregiving and home death among the oldest-old: A population-based retrospective cohort study in China.高龄老人的家庭护理资源可及性、主要照护类型与家中死亡情况:一项基于中国人群的回顾性队列研究
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Nov 30;20:101308. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101308. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Association between immigrant status and advanced cancer patients' location and quality of death.移民身份与晚期癌症患者死亡地点和死亡质量的关系。
Cancer. 2022 Sep 15;128(18):3352-3359. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34385. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
6
The Intersection of Rural Residence and Minority Race/Ethnicity in Cancer Disparities in the United States.美国农村居住与癌症差异中的少数民族种族/族裔的交集。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1384. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041384.