• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国妇科癌症患者死亡地点趋势。

Trends in Place of Death Among Patients With Gynecologic Cancer in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Tufts Medical Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;131(6):1111-1120. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002614.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002614
PMID:29742673
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the change over time in place of death (hospital, home, hospice) among all women in the United States who died of gynecologic malignancies and compare them with other leading causes of female cancer deaths.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study using national death certificate data from the Mortality Multiple Cause-of-Death Public Use Record Data. All women who died from gynecologic, breast, lung, and colorectal cancers were identified according to International Classification of Diseases, 10 Revision, cause of death from 2003 to 2015. Regression analyses with ordinary least-squares linear probability modeling were used to test for differences in location of death over time, and differences in trends by cancer type, while controlling for age, race, ethnicity, marital status, and education status.

RESULTS

From 2003 to 2015, 2,133,056 women died from gynecologic, lung, breast, and colorectal malignancies in the United States. A total of 359,340 died from gynecologic malignancies, including ovarian cancer (n=188,366 [52.4%]), uterine cancer (n=106,454 [29.6%]), cervical cancer (n=52,320 [14.6%]), and vulvar cancer (n=12,200 [3.4%]). Overall, 49.2% (n=176,657) of gynecologic cancer deaths occurred at home or in hospice. The relative increase from 2003 to 2015 in the rate of deaths at home or in hospice was 47.2% for gynecologic cancer deaths (40.5% in 2003 to 59.5% in 2015). In adjusted analyses, the trend in the percentage of deaths at home or in hospice increased at a rate of 1.6 percentage points per year for gynecologic cancer deaths (95% CI 1.5-1.6) vs 1.5 (95% CI 1.4-1.5, P<.001), 1.4 (95% CI 1.4-1.5, P<.001), and 1.5 (95% CI 1.4-1.5, P=.09) percentage points per year for lung, breast, and colorectal cancer deaths, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Between 2003 and 2015, there was a 47.2% increase (40.5-59.5%) in the rates of gynecologic cancer deaths occurring at home or in hospice. This trend may represent an increase in advance care planning and value-based treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

描述美国所有死于妇科恶性肿瘤的女性在不同时间的死亡地点(医院、家中、临终关怀)的变化,并将其与其他女性癌症死亡的主要原因进行比较。

方法

这是一项使用 2003 年至 2015 年《国际疾病分类》第 10 次修订版死因的国家死亡证明数据进行的回顾性横截面研究。根据国际疾病分类,所有死于妇科、乳腺、肺和结直肠癌症的女性都被确定为癌症死亡原因。使用普通最小二乘法线性概率模型进行回归分析,以检验随时间推移的死亡地点差异,并控制年龄、种族、民族、婚姻状况和教育程度后,检验癌症类型的趋势差异。

结果

2003 年至 2015 年,美国共有 2133056 名女性死于妇科、肺、乳腺和结直肠恶性肿瘤。共有 359340 名女性死于妇科恶性肿瘤,其中卵巢癌(n=188366 [52.4%])、子宫癌(n=106454 [29.6%])、宫颈癌(n=52320 [14.6%])和外阴癌(n=12200 [3.4%])。总体而言,49.2%(n=176657)的妇科癌症死亡发生在家庭或临终关怀中。2003 年至 2015 年,妇科癌症死亡在家中或临终关怀中死亡的比例相对增加了 47.2%(2003 年为 40.5%,2015 年为 59.5%)。在调整后的分析中,妇科癌症死亡在家中或临终关怀中死亡的比例呈每年增加 1.6 个百分点的趋势(95%CI 1.5-1.6),而肺癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌死亡的比例分别为每年增加 1.5(95%CI 1.4-1.5,P<.001)、1.4(95%CI 1.4-1.5,P<.001)和 1.5(95%CI 1.4-1.5,P=.09)个百分点。

结论

2003 年至 2015 年间,在家中或临终关怀中死亡的妇科癌症死亡率上升了 47.2%(40.5-59.5%)。这一趋势可能代表着提前护理计划和基于价值的治疗决策的增加。

相似文献

1
Trends in Place of Death Among Patients With Gynecologic Cancer in the United States.美国妇科癌症患者死亡地点趋势。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;131(6):1111-1120. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002614.
2
Place of death by region and urbanization among gynecologic cancer patients: 2006-2016.妇科癌症患者的死亡地点按地区和城市化程度划分:2006-2016 年。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Oct;155(1):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Trends in Place of Death for Cardiovascular Mortality Related to Heart Failure in the United States From 2003 to 2017.2003 年至 2017 年美国与心力衰竭相关心血管死亡率的死亡地点趋势。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Feb;13(2):e006587. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006587. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
4
Family Perspectives on Aggressive Cancer Care Near the End of Life.家庭对临终前积极癌症治疗的看法。
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):284-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18604.
5
Trends and Factors Associated with Place of Death for Individuals with Dementia in the United States.美国痴呆症患者死亡地点的趋势和相关因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):250-255. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16200. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
Reversal of English trend towards hospital death in dementia: a population-based study of place of death and associated individual and regional factors, 2001-2010.在痴呆症中逆转英语趋势:2001-2010 年基于人群的死亡地点及相关个体和区域因素研究。
BMC Neurol. 2014 Mar 26;14:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-59.
7
Place of death for patients with cancer in the United States, 1999 through 2015: Racial, age, and geographic disparities.美国癌症患者的死亡地点,1999 年至 2015 年:种族、年龄和地域差异。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 15;124(22):4408-4419. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31737. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
8
An 11-Year Study of Home Hospice Service Trends in Singapore from 2000 to 2010.2000年至2010年新加坡居家临终关怀服务趋势的11年研究
J Palliat Med. 2017 May;20(5):461-472. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0268. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
9
National Trends in Hospice Facility Deaths in the United States, 2003-2017.美国 2003-2017 年的临终关怀机构死亡人数的全国趋势。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Feb;61(2):350-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
10
Mortality rates due to gynecologic cancers in New York state by demographic factors and proximity to a Gynecologic Oncology Group member treatment center: 1979-2001.1979 - 2001年纽约州因妇科癌症导致的死亡率,按人口统计学因素及与妇科肿瘤学组成员治疗中心的距离划分
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug;114(2):346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.033. Epub 2009 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world drug treatment models of novel targeted drugs in Chinese patients with gynecological cancer from 2017 to 2021: A cross-sectional analysis.2017年至2021年中国妇科癌症患者新型靶向药物的真实世界药物治疗模式:一项横断面分析。
Heliyon. 2024 May 17;10(11):e31371. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31371. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
2
Exploring factors and trends in place of death by cancer: a population-based study in Brazil.探索癌症死亡地点的影响因素和趋势:巴西一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 May 14;34:100764. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100764. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Prevalence and Landscape of Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Germline Variants and Their Association With Somatic Phenotype in Unselected Chinese Patients With Gynecologic Cancers.
未选择的中国妇科癌症患者种种系致病性或可能致病性变体的流行情况及其与体细胞表型的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2326437. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26437.
4
Association between immigrant status and advanced cancer patients' location and quality of death.移民身份与晚期癌症患者死亡地点和死亡质量的关系。
Cancer. 2022 Sep 15;128(18):3352-3359. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34385. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
5
Assessment of changes in place of death of older adults who died from dementia in the United States, 2000-2014: a time-series cross-sectional analysis.评估 2000-2014 年美国死于痴呆症的老年人死亡地点的变化:时间序列横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 11;20(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08894-0.
6
Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: When Adoption of a Novel Treatment Precedes Prospective, Randomized Evidence.宫颈癌的微创根治性子宫切除术:在有前瞻性随机证据之前采用新疗法的情况。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 20;37(33):3069-3074. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01164. Epub 2019 Sep 27.