• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过关注过程和多元文化主义来建设基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的能力。

Building Capacity in Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships Through a Focus on Process and Multiculturalism.

作者信息

Corbie-Smith Giselle, Bryant Angela R, Walker Deborah J, Blumenthal Connie, Council Barbara, Courtney Dana, Adimora Ada

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):261-73. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0038.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2015.0038
PMID:26412767
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In health research, investigators and funders are emphasizing the importance of collaboration between communities and academic institutions to achieve health equity. Although the principles underlying community-academic partnered research have been well-articulated, the processes by which partnerships integrate these principles when working across cultural differences are not as well described.

OBJECTIVES

We present how Project GRACE (Growing, Reaching, Advocating for Change and Empowerment) integrated participatory research principles with the process of building individual and partnership capacity.

METHODS

We worked with Vigorous Interventions In Ongoing Natural Settings (VISIONS) Inc., a process consultant and training organization, to develop a capacity building model. We present the conceptual framework and multicultural process of change (MPOC) that was used to build individual and partnership capacity to address health disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

The process and capacity building model provides a common language, approach, and toolset to understand differences and the dynamics of inequity. These tools can be used by other partnerships in the conduct of research to achieve health equity.

摘要

背景

在健康研究中,研究者和资助者都强调社区与学术机构之间合作对于实现健康公平的重要性。尽管社区 - 学术合作研究的基本原则已得到充分阐述,但当跨文化差异开展合作时,合作关系整合这些原则的过程却没有得到很好的描述。

目的

我们展示“GRACE项目”(成长、拓展、倡导变革与赋权)如何将参与式研究原则与建立个人及合作关系能力的过程相结合。

方法

我们与“持续自然环境中的有力干预”(VISIONS)公司合作,该公司是一家流程咨询和培训组织,共同开发了一个能力建设模型。我们展示了用于建立个人及合作关系能力以解决健康差距问题的概念框架和多元文化变革过程(MPOC)。

结论

该过程和能力建设模型提供了一种通用语言、方法和工具集,以理解差异和不平等的动态。这些工具可被其他合作关系用于开展研究以实现健康公平。

相似文献

1
Building Capacity in Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships Through a Focus on Process and Multiculturalism.通过关注过程和多元文化主义来建设基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的能力。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):261-73. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0038.
2
Participatory evaluation of a community-academic partnership to inform capacity-building and sustainability.社区-学术伙伴关系的参与式评估,以指导能力建设和可持续性发展。
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Oct;52:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
3
Building capacity for community-based participatory research for health disparities in Canada: the case of "Partnerships in Community Health Research".建设加拿大基于社区的参与性健康差异研究能力:以“社区健康研究伙伴关系”为例。
Health Promot Pract. 2011 Mar;12(2):280-92. doi: 10.1177/1524839909355520. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
4
Project GRACE: a staged approach to development of a community-academic partnership to address HIV in rural African American communities.GRACE项目:一种分阶段发展社区-学术伙伴关系以应对美国农村非裔社区艾滋病毒问题的方法。
Health Promot Pract. 2011 Mar;12(2):293-302. doi: 10.1177/1524839909348766. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
5
Practical Tips for Establishing Partnerships With Academic Researchers: A Resource Guide for Community-Based Organizations.与学术研究人员建立合作关系的实用技巧:社区组织资源指南。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):203-12. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0042.
6
Miami's Third Sector Alliance for Community Well-being.迈阿密社区福祉第三部门联盟。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Summer;8(2):225-31. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0018.
7
Establishing New Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships using the Community-Based Participatory Research Charrette Model: Lessons from the Cancer Health Accountability for Managing Pain and Symptoms Study.使用基于社区的参与式研究工作坊模式建立新的基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系:癌症疼痛和症状管理健康问责制研究的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(1):89-99. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0010.
8
The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.指导社区-学术伙伴关系的双向参与与公平(BEE)研究框架:基于叙事性综述和多元利益相关者视角制定
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14161. doi: 10.1111/hex.14161.
9
Community-based research in action: tales from the Ktunaxa community learning centres project.基于社区的实际研究:来自库特奈族社区学习中心项目的故事
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Autumn;8(3):281-90. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0044.
10
Team-building activities as strategies for improving community-university partnerships: lessons learned from Nuestro Futuro Saludable.团队建设活动作为改善社区与大学伙伴关系的策略:从“我们健康的未来”项目中汲取的经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Summer;6(2):213-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0030.

引用本文的文献

1
Design and implementation of a Community Expert Group comprised of people with lived expertise of homelessness at an academic health research center: a program description and analysis of challenges.学术健康研究中心内由有过无家可归生活经历的人组成的社区专家小组的设计与实施:项目描述及挑战分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 15;11(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00733-z.
2
Community-Based Participatory Research for Epidemiology, Health Equity, and Community Goals: Insights From Brazil, France, and USA.基于社区的流行病学、健康公平与社区目标参与式研究:来自巴西、法国和美国的见解
Community Health Equity Res Policy. 2025 Jul;45(4):385-393. doi: 10.1177/2752535X241262857. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
3
Building the foundation for equitable and inclusive research: Seed grant programs to facilitate development of diverse CBPR community-academic research partnerships.
为公平和包容性研究奠定基础:种子基金项目助力多元社区-学术研究伙伴关系的发展。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Nov 24;7(1):e2. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.495. eCollection 2023.
4
A conceptual framework for capacity strengthening of health research in conflict: the case of the Middle East and North Africa region.加强冲突中卫生研究能力的概念框架:以中东和北非地区为例。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0525-3.
5
Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review.长期社区参与式研究(CBPR)伙伴关系的成功:范围文献综述。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;47(4):556-568. doi: 10.1177/1090198119882989. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
6
Enhancing Capacity of Community-Academic Partnerships to Achieve Health Equity: Results From the CBPR Partnership Academy.增强社区-学术伙伴关系的能力以实现健康公平:基于 CBPR 伙伴关系学院的研究结果。
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jul;21(4):552-563. doi: 10.1177/1524839918818830. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
7
A paradigm for understanding trust and mistrust in medical research: The Community VOICES study.一种理解医学研究中信任与不信任的范式:社区声音研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):39-47. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1432718. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
8
Development of a Systems Science Curriculum to Engage Rural African American Teens in Understanding and Addressing Childhood Obesity Prevention.开发系统科学课程,使农村非裔美国青少年参与理解和解决儿童肥胖预防问题。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Jun;45(3):423-434. doi: 10.1177/1090198117726570. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9
A Retrospective on the Vision for : .对……愿景的回顾 : 。 你提供的原文“A Retrospective on the Vision for :.”似乎不太完整,冒号后面缺少具体内容,请补充完整以便能更准确地翻译。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(1):1-11. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0001.