Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Oct 15;40(15):4564-4576. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24721. Epub 2019 Aug 4.
Mind wandering (MW) has become a prominent topic of neuroscientific investigation due to the importance of understanding attentional processes in our day-to-day experiences. Emerging evidence suggests a critical role for three large-scale brain networks in MW: the default network (DN), the central executive network (CEN), and the salience network (SN). Advances in analytical methods for neuroimaging data (i.e., dynamic functional connectivity, DFC) demonstrate that the interactions between these networks are not static but dynamically fluctuate over time (Chang & Glover, 2010, NeuroImage, 50(1), 81-98). While the bulk of the evidence comes from studies involving resting-state functional MRI, a few studies have investigated DFC during a task. Direct comparison of DFC during rest and task with frequent MW is scarce. The present study applies the DFC method to neuroimaging data collected from 30 participants who completed a resting-state run followed by two runs of sustained attention to response task (SART) with embedded probes indicating a high prevalence of MW. The analysis identified five DFC states. Differences between rest and task were noted in the frequency of three DFC states. One DFC state characterized by negative DN-CEN/SN connectivity along with positive CEN-SN connectivity was more frequently observed during task vs. rest. Two DFC states, one of which was characterized by weaker connectivity between networks, were more frequently observed during rest than task. These findings suggest that the dynamic relationships between brain networks may vary as a function of whether ongoing cognitive activity unfolds in an "unconstrained" manner during rest or is "constrained" by task demands.
思维漫游(MW)已成为神经科学研究的一个重要课题,因为理解我们日常经验中的注意力过程至关重要。新出现的证据表明,三个大规模的大脑网络在 MW 中起着关键作用:默认网络(DN)、中央执行网络(CEN)和突显网络(SN)。用于神经影像学数据的分析方法的进步(即动态功能连接,DFC)表明,这些网络之间的相互作用不是静态的,而是随时间动态波动的(Chang & Glover,2010,NeuroImage,50(1),81-98)。虽然大部分证据来自涉及静息状态功能磁共振成像的研究,但也有一些研究在任务期间调查了 DFC。在频繁发生 MW 的情况下,静息状态和任务的 DFC 直接比较很少。本研究应用 DFC 方法对 30 名参与者的神经影像学数据进行了分析,这些参与者完成了一次静息状态运行,然后进行了两次持续注意反应任务(SART)运行,其中嵌入了表明 MW 高发的探针。分析确定了五个 DFC 状态。在 rest 和 task 之间,三种 DFC 状态的频率存在差异。在 task 中与 rest 相比,一种以 DN-CEN/SN 连接呈负相关和 CEN-SN 连接呈正相关为特征的 DFC 状态更为频繁出现。在 rest 中比在 task 中更频繁观察到两种 DFC 状态,其中一种状态的网络间连接较弱。这些发现表明,大脑网络之间的动态关系可能会根据认知活动是否在 rest 期间以“不受约束”的方式展开或受到任务需求的“约束”而有所不同。