• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传咨询对年轻乳腺癌女性接受对侧预防性乳房切除术的影响。

Impact of genetic counseling on the uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among younger women with breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2020 Jan;59(1):60-65. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1648860. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1080/0284186X.2019.1648860
PMID:31379231
Abstract

Preoperative genetic testing affects the surgical decision-making among women with breast cancer. To avoid breast-conserving surgery and to offer the possibility of mastectomy with immediate reconstruction in high-risk patients, genetic testing for pathogenic variants in or and a pedigree-based familial breast cancer risk assessment was offered to younger women with breast cancer in Denmark. We evaluated the impact of the risk stratification through genetic counseling on the uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). The prospective cohort study included all women with unilateral breast cancer before the age of 45 who participated in a genetic counseling program during their primary diagnostics in the Central Denmark Region (2013-2018). Each patient was followed from the time of the genetic test result to the end of follow-up to estimate the long-term uptake of CPM as a competing risk-adjusted cumulative incidence. We compared the uptake of CPM between the various genetic risk categories, ages of onset, and family histories in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model, reporting hazard ratios (HR) with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 156 females, aged 21-44, learned their genetic test result within a median of 92 days [interquartile range (IQR): 75-114]. The maximal follow-up was 3.8 years (median 1.8; IQR: 0.49-2.5), after which 33% (95% CI: 24-42%) of the patients had undergone CPM. The uptake of CPM was inversely associated with the age of onset (HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86-0.98) and significantly higher among BRCA carriers (HR 2.9; 95% CI: 1.3-6.8) and patients from the high risk of breast cancer families (HR 5.6; 95% CI: 1.9-16) compared to the lower genetic risk categories. The risk stratification obtained through genetic counseling had a considerable impact on the surgical decision-making among younger women with breast cancer at long-term follow-up.

摘要

术前基因检测会影响乳腺癌女性的手术决策。为避免保乳手术,并为高风险患者提供即刻重建的乳房切除术选择,丹麦为年轻乳腺癌患者提供了针对 或 种致病性变异的基因检测,以及基于家族史的乳腺癌风险评估。我们评估了通过遗传咨询进行风险分层对接受对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)的影响。这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了在丹麦中部地区(2013-2018 年)初次诊断期间参加遗传咨询计划的所有 45 岁以下单侧乳腺癌女性。每位患者从基因检测结果的时间开始随访至随访结束,以估计 CPM 的长期接受率,作为竞争风险调整的累积发生率。我们在多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型中比较了不同遗传风险类别、发病年龄和家族史之间 CPM 的接受率,报告了双侧 95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(HR)。156 名年龄在 21-44 岁的女性在中位数为 92 天[四分位距(IQR):75-114]内得知了基因检测结果。最大随访时间为 3.8 年(中位数 1.8;IQR:0.49-2.5),在此之后,33%(95%CI:24-42%)的患者接受了 CPM。CPM 的接受率与发病年龄呈负相关(HR 0.92;95%CI:0.86-0.98),BRCA 携带者(HR 2.9;95%CI:1.3-6.8)和来自高乳腺癌风险家族的患者(HR 5.6;95%CI:1.9-16)明显高于低遗传风险类别。遗传咨询获得的风险分层对长期随访的年轻乳腺癌女性的手术决策产生了重大影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of genetic counseling on the uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among younger women with breast cancer.遗传咨询对年轻乳腺癌女性接受对侧预防性乳房切除术的影响。
Acta Oncol. 2020 Jan;59(1):60-65. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1648860. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Frequency of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients with a Negative BRCA1 and BRCA2 Rapid Genetic Test Result.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 快速基因检测结果阴性的乳腺癌患者行预防性对侧乳房切除术的频率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):4967-4973. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09855-6. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
What made her give up her breasts: a qualitative study on decisional considerations for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among breast cancer survivors undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing.是什么促使她切除乳房:一项关于接受BRCA1/2基因检测的乳腺癌幸存者对侧预防性乳房切除术决策考量的定性研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(5):2241-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.5.2241.
4
A clinically structured and partnered approach to genetic testing in Trinidadian women with breast cancer and their families.特立尼达和多巴哥乳腺癌女性及其家族的临床结构化和合作式基因检测方法。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(2):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5045-y. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
5
Women's preferences for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy following unilateral breast cancer: What risk-reduction makes it worthwhile?单侧乳腺癌患者对双侧预防性乳房切除术的偏好:何种风险降低程度使其值得进行?
Breast. 2017 Feb;31:233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.025. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
6
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: what surgeons need to know.BRCA 突变携带者的双侧预防性乳房切除术:外科医生需要了解的内容。
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:1-2.
7
Local Therapy Decision-Making and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌年轻女性的局部治疗决策与对侧预防性乳房切除术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;22(12):3809-15. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4572-6. Epub 2015 May 1.
8
Psychosocial factors associated with the uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers with newly diagnosed breast cancer.在新诊断为乳腺癌的BRCA1/2基因未携带者中,与对侧预防性乳房切除术接受情况相关的心理社会因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Apr;162(2):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4123-x. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
Predictors and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者对侧预防性乳房切除术的预测因素及结局
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Sep;104(3):321-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9423-5. Epub 2006 Oct 26.
10
High patient satisfaction with a simplified BRCA1/2 testing procedure: long-term results of a prospective study.患者对简化 BRCA1/2 检测程序的高度满意度:一项前瞻性研究的长期结果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;173(2):313-318. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5000-y. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Timely germline BRCA testing after invasive breast cancer promotes contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy and improves survival: an observational retrospective study.浸润性乳腺癌后及时进行种系BRCA检测可促进对侧预防性乳房切除术并提高生存率:一项观察性回顾性研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07726-2.
2
Comparing Prognosis for , , and Non-BRCA Breast Cancer.比较 、 和非BRCA乳腺癌的预后。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 3;15(23):5699. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235699.
3
Validation of the BOADICEA model for predicting the likelihood of carrying pathogenic variants in eight breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes.
验证 BOADICEA 模型预测携带八种乳腺癌和卵巢癌易感性基因致病性变异的可能性。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 26;13(1):8536. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35755-8.
4
Current Considerations in Surgical Treatment for Adolescents and Young Women with Breast Cancer.青少年及年轻女性乳腺癌外科治疗的当前考量
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 15;10(12):2542. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122542.
5
Impact of Breast Reconstruction Patients on Cosmetic Practice.乳房重建患者对美容实践的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jun 15;9(6):e3614. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003614. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Management of patients with BRCA mutation from the point of view of a breast surgeon.从乳腺外科医生的角度看BRCA突变患者的管理
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Apr 16;65:102311. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102311. eCollection 2021 May.
7
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: An Advanced Personalized Multidisciplinary Prehabilitation Model (APMP-M) to Optimize Outcomes.乳腺癌新辅助化疗:一种优化治疗结果的先进个性化多学科预康复模型(APMP-M)
J Pers Med. 2021 Apr 21;11(5):324. doi: 10.3390/jpm11050324.
8
The Angelina Jolie effect: Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy trends in patients at increased risk of breast cancer.安吉丽娜·朱莉效应:高乳腺癌风险患者行预防性对侧乳房切除术的趋势。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 2;11(1):2847. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82654-x.