• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跟我们重复:句法对齐并非特定于伙伴。

Repeat After Us: Syntactic Alignment is Not Partner-Specific.

作者信息

Ostrand Rachel, Ferreira Victor S

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, #0515, La Jolla, CA 92093-0515, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, #0109, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109, United States.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2019 Oct;108. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104037. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2019.104037
PMID:31379406
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6677274/
Abstract

Conversational partners match each other's speech, a process known as . Such alignment can be , when speakers match particular partners' production distributions, or , when speakers match aggregated linguistic statistics across their input. However, partner-specificity has only been assessed in situations where it had clear communicative utility, and non-alignment might cause communicative difficulty. Here, we investigate whether speakers align partner-specifically even without a communicative need, and thus whether the mechanism driving alignment is sensitive to communicative and social factors of the linguistic context. In five experiments, participants interacted with two experimenters, each with unique and systematic syntactic preferences (e.g., Experimenter A only produced double object datives and Experimenter B only produced prepositional datives). Across multiple exposure conditions, participants engaged in partner-independent but not partner-specific alignment. Thus, when partner-specificity does not add communicative utility, speakers align to aggregate, partner-independent statistical distributions, supporting a communicatively-modulated mechanism underlying alignment.

摘要

对话伙伴会相互匹配对方的言语,这一过程被称为 。这种匹配可以是 ,即说话者匹配特定伙伴的产出分布,也可以是 ,即说话者匹配其输入中的聚合语言统计数据。然而,特定伙伴性仅在具有明确交际效用的情况下进行了评估,而非匹配可能会导致交际困难。在这里,我们研究说话者是否即使在没有交际需求的情况下也会进行特定伙伴的匹配,从而研究驱动匹配的机制是否对语言语境的交际和社会因素敏感。在五个实验中,参与者与两名实验者互动,每名实验者都有独特且系统的句法偏好(例如,实验者A只使用双宾语与格,实验者B只使用介词与格)。在多种接触条件下,参与者进行了不依赖于伙伴但非特定于伙伴的匹配。因此,当特定伙伴性不增加交际效用时,说话者会匹配聚合的、不依赖于伙伴的统计分布,这支持了一种由交际调节的匹配机制。

相似文献

1
Repeat After Us: Syntactic Alignment is Not Partner-Specific.跟我们重复:句法对齐并非特定于伙伴。
J Mem Lang. 2019 Oct;108. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104037. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
2
It's alignment all the way down, but not all the way up: Speakers align on some features but not others within a dialogue.一直向下都是对齐的,但向上并非如此:在对话中,说话者在某些特征上是对齐的,但在其他特征上并非如此。
J Phon. 2021 Sep;88. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101074.
3
Does Syntactic Alignment Effectively Influence How Speakers Are Perceived by Their Conversation Partner?句法对齐是否会有效影响说话者在对话伙伴眼中的形象?
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 15;11(4):e0153521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153521. eCollection 2016.
4
Stronger Syntactic Alignment in the Presence of an Interlocutor.在有对话者在场的情况下更强的句法对齐。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 27;10:685. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00685. eCollection 2019.
5
Conversational Entrainment of Vocal Fry in Young Adult Female American English Speakers.美国年轻成年女性英语使用者中发声破裂音的对话性韵律匹配
J Voice. 2017 Jul;31(4):513.e25-513.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
6
A little more conversation - the influence of communicative context on syntactic priming in brain and behavior.多一些对话——交际语境对大脑和行为中句法启动的影响。
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 18;5:208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00208. eCollection 2014.
7
Do priming effects in dialogue reflect partner- or task-based expectations?对话中的启动效应反映了基于伙伴还是任务的期望?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):309-16. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0191-9.
8
Speakers extrapolate community-level knowledge from individual linguistic encounters.说话者从个体的语言交流中推断出社区层面的知识。
Cognition. 2021 May;210:104602. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104602. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Effects of Participant Engagement on Prosodic Prominence.参与者参与对韵律突出性的影响。
Discourse Process. 2018;55(3):305-323. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2016.1240742. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
10
Speakers Align With Their Partner's Overspecification During Interaction.说话者在互动中与他们的伙伴的过度指定保持一致。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Dec;45(12):e13065. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13065.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing Pronouns Primes Speakers to Use Pronouns.听到代词会促使说话者使用代词。
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Jan 4;9:47-69. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00178. eCollection 2025.
2
The role of priming in grammatical acceptability judgements for native versus non-native speakers: Effects of intelligibility.启动效应对母语和非母语者语法可接受性判断的作用:可理解度的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0275191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275191. eCollection 2022.
3
It's alignment all the way down, but not all the way up: Speakers align on some features but not others within a dialogue.一直向下都是对齐的,但向上并非如此:在对话中,说话者在某些特征上是对齐的,但在其他特征上并非如此。
J Phon. 2021 Sep;88. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101074.
4
Syntactic Entrainment: The Repetition of Syntactic Structures in Event Descriptions.句法夹带:事件描述中句法结构的重复
J Mem Lang. 2019 Aug;107:216-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Syntactic Entrainment: The Repetition of Syntactic Structures in Event Descriptions.句法夹带:事件描述中句法结构的重复
J Mem Lang. 2019 Aug;107:216-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 May 23.
2
Talker-specificity and adaptation in quantifier interpretation.量词解释中的说话者特异性与适应性。
J Mem Lang. 2016 Apr 1;87:128-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.08.003.
3
Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.强大的语音感知:识别熟悉的内容,将其推广到相似的内容,并适应新的内容。
Psychol Rev. 2015 Apr;122(2):148-203. doi: 10.1037/a0038695.
4
Partner-specific adaptation in dialog.对话中的特定伙伴适应性。
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;1(2):274-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01019.x.
5
Adjusting conceptual pacts in three-party conversation.在三方对话中调整概念协定。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jul;40(4):919-37. doi: 10.1037/a0036161. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
6
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
7
Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension.快速的预期适应在句法理解中。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077661. eCollection 2013.
8
Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience.由于期望适应而产生的调整:在考虑先前和最近的经验的情况下,语法启动受启动项预测错误的影响。
Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):57-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
9
Learning individual talkers' structural preferences.学习个体说话者的结构偏好。
Cognition. 2012 Jul;124(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
10
Structural priming as implicit learning: cumulative priming effects and individual differences.结构启动作为内隐学习:累积启动效应和个体差异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Dec;18(6):1133-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0157-y.