Brunner Richard, Craig Peter, Watson Nick
University of Glasgow, UK.
Evaluation (Lond). 2019 Jul;25(3):349-365. doi: 10.1177/1356389019852126. Epub 2019 Jun 2.
Evaluation is essential to understand whether and how policies and other interventions work, why they sometimes fail, and whether they represent a good use of resources. Evaluability assessment (EA) is a means of collaboratively planning and designing evaluations, seeking to ensure they generate relevant and robust evidence that supports decision-making and contributes to the wider evidence base. This article reports on the context, the process undertaken and evidence from participants in an EA facilitated with public service workers involved in implementing a complex, area-based community improvement initiative. This is a novel context in which to conduct an EA. We show how the process allows practitioners at all levels to identify activities for evaluation and co-produce the theory of change developed through the EA. This enables evaluation recommendations to be developed that are relevant to the implementation of the programme, and which take account of available data and resources for evaluation.
评估对于了解政策及其他干预措施是否有效、如何发挥作用、为何有时会失败以及它们是否合理利用资源至关重要。可评估性评估(EA)是一种协作规划和设计评估的方法,旨在确保评估能产生相关且有力的证据,以支持决策制定并丰富更广泛的证据基础。本文报告了在与参与实施一项复杂的、基于地区的社区改善倡议的公共服务工作者共同开展的可评估性评估中,其背景、过程以及参与者提供的证据。这是开展可评估性评估的一个全新背景。我们展示了该过程如何使各级从业者确定用于评估的活动,并共同制定通过可评估性评估得出的变革理论。这有助于制定与项目实施相关的评估建议,同时考虑到可用的数据和评估资源。