对于特定患者而言，使用微创技术增加了价值考量因素。
Using minimally invasive techniques adds to the value equation for select patients.
作者信息
Mok Jung Kee, Gang Catherine Himo, Qureshi Sheeraz, McAnany Steven J
机构信息
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
出版信息
J Spine Surg. 2019 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S101-S107. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.05.03.
Abstract
Conditions of the spine are one of the most prevalent causes of global disability, and result in a considerable portion of total health expenditures. Surgical treatment of the spine has been demonstrated in multiple studies to be a cost-effective treatment option for many patients, especially with continuing improvements in surgical technique and instrumentation. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), in particular, has evolved as a valuable option in treating certain patients. Numerous studies have analyzed minimally invasive techniques in regards to cost-effectiveness and other purported advantages. These advantages include conduciveness to outpatient settings, better perioperative and immediate post-operative benefits, and faster time to recovery. This article will describe the current literature on the advantages of MISS, specifically in regards to value and cost savings.
摘要
脊柱疾病是导致全球残疾的最常见原因之一，在总医疗支出中占相当大的比例。多项研究表明，脊柱手术对许多患者来说是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择，尤其是随着手术技术和器械的不断改进。特别是，微创脊柱手术（MISS）已成为治疗某些患者的一种有价值的选择。许多研究分析了微创技术在成本效益和其他所谓优势方面的情况。这些优势包括适合门诊治疗、更好的围手术期和术后即刻效果，以及更快的恢复时间。本文将介绍当前关于微创脊柱手术优势的文献，特别是在价值和成本节约方面。
相似文献
1
Using minimally invasive techniques adds to the value equation for select patients.对于特定患者而言，使用微创技术增加了价值考量因素。
J Spine Surg. 2019 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S101-S107. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.05.03.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis in minimally invasive spine surgery.微创脊柱手术的成本效益分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Jun;36(6):E4. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.FOCUS1449.
4
Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with standard open surgery for vertebral thoracic metastases causing acute myelopathy in patients with short- or mid-term life expectancy: surgical technique and early clinical results.预期寿命短或中期的患者因胸椎转移瘤导致急性脊髓病时，微创手术与标准开放手术的比较：手术技术及早期临床结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 May;22(5):518-25. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131201. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
5
[Precise application of Traditional Chinese Medicine in minimally-invasive techniques].[中医在微创技术中的精准应用]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Jun 25;31(6):493-496. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.06.001.
6
Use of lasers in minimally invasive spine surgery.激光在微创脊柱手术中的应用。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Jun;15(6):423-433. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1483236. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
7
Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in Small Animals.小动物的微创脊柱手术
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2018 Jan;48(1):153-168. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
8
The use of minimally invasive surgery in spine trauma: a review of concepts.脊柱创伤中微创手术的应用：概念综述
J Spine Surg. 2019 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S91-S100. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.13.
9
The Evolution and Advancement of Endoscopic Foraminal Surgery: One Surgeon's Experience Incorporating Adjunctive Techologies.内镜下椎间孔手术的发展与进步：一位外科医生应用辅助技术的经验
SAS J. 2007 Aug 1;1(3):108-17. doi: 10.1016/SASJ-2006-0014-RR. eCollection 2007.
10
Minimally invasive spine surgery for degenerative spine disease and deformity correction: a literature review.用于退行性脊柱疾病和畸形矫正的微创脊柱手术：文献综述
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Mar;6(6):99. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.18.
引用本文的文献
1
Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Last 10 Years: A Narrative Review.过去十年微创脊柱手术的并发症：一项叙述性综述
Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):770-803. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448652.326. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
The Impact of Preoperative Sagittal Imbalance on Long-term Postoperative Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Laminectomy.术前矢状面失衡对微创椎板切除术后长期疗效的影响。
HSS J. 2024 May;20(2):222-229. doi: 10.1177/15563316231162851. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
3
Improvement following minimally invasive lumbar decompression in patients 80 years or older compared with younger age groups.80 岁及以上患者微创腰椎减压术后的改善情况与年轻患者相比。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Jul 1;37(6):828-835. doi: 10.3171/2022.5.SPINE22361. Print 2022 Dec 1.
4
Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.微创腰椎手术常见问题的实用解答。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
5
Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?椎间笼前凸是否会影响微创腰椎融合术中实际获得的节段前凸？
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E17. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20393.
6
Patient Reported Outcomes in Patients Who Stop Following Up: Are They Doing Better or Worse Than the Patients That Come Back?停止随访患者的患者报告结局：他们的情况比回来复诊的患者更好还是更差？
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Oct 15;45(20):1435-1442. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003543.
7
CORR Insights®: Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?CORR见解®：使用管状牵开器系统进行脊柱减压后，极度狭窄与非极度狭窄患者在疼痛、功能或并发症方面是否存在差异？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Feb;478(2):357-358. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001052.
本文引用的文献
1
Safety and Efficacy of Revision Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression in the Ambulatory Setting.门诊环境下微创腰椎减压术翻修的安全性和疗效。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 15;44(8):E494-E499. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002881.
2
Does patient selection account for the perceived cost savings in outpatient spine surgery? A meta-analysis of current evidence and analysis from an administrative database.患者选择是否是门诊脊柱手术中所认为的成本节约的原因？对现有证据的荟萃分析及来自行政数据库的分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Dec 1;29(6):687-695. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.SPINE1864. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
3
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Integration of Robotic Spine Technology in Spine Surgery.机器人脊柱技术在脊柱手术中应用的成本效益分析
Neurospine. 2018 Sep;15(3):216-224. doi: 10.14245/ns.1836082.041. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
4
The cost effectiveness of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: a comparison of transpsoas and open techniques.经皮椎间孔入路脊柱微创技术与传统开放手术治疗成人退变性脊柱侧弯的成本效果分析。
Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):339-348. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.040. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
Minimally Invasive Lateral Access Surgery and Reoperation Rates: A Multi-Institution Retrospective Review of 2060 Patients.微创外侧入路手术与再次手术率：对2060例患者的多机构回顾性研究
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e744-e749. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.082. Epub 2018 May 19.
6
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Fusion Is More Effective Than Open Fusion: A Meta-Analysis.微创腰椎融合术比开放融合术更有效：一项荟萃分析。
Yonsei Med J. 2018 Jun;59(4):524-538. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.4.524.
7
Limitations and complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery in adult deformity.成人脊柱畸形微创手术的局限性与并发症
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Mar;6(6):109. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.01.29.
8
Spine Surgery in the Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting: Value-Based Advancement or Safety Liability?在日间手术中心进行脊柱手术：基于价值的提升还是安全责任？
Neurosurgery. 2018 Aug 1;83(2):159-165. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy057.
9
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion.与开放后路腰椎内固定融合术相比，微创手术的疗效
Asian J Neurosurg. 2017 Oct-Dec;12(4):620-637. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_331_16.
10
Is minimally invasive surgery superior to open surgery for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review.微创手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症是否优于开放手术？一项系统评价。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 May-Aug;25(2):2309499017716254. doi: 10.1177/2309499017716254.
Zotero 插件