Faculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China; Guangdong Province Translational Forensic Medicine Engineering Technology Research Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China.
Faculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Sep;42:235-243. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
Mongolians played a pivotal role in shaping the culture and genetic architecture of modern Eurasia through the rapid expansion of the Mongol Empire in the 13th century. While the historical aspects of the Mongolian Empire are well documented, research on the genetic variations among Mongolian populations is still insufficient. In this study, we examined the genetic diversity of 70 Torghut Mongols residing in the Ili region of China compared with 88 Jalaid Mongols residing 3000 km away. Over 200 forensically relevant genetic markers, including autosomal short tandem repeats (A-STRs), X chromosomal STRs (X-STRs), Y chromosomal STRs (Y-STRs), identity-informative single nucleotide polymorphisms (iiSNPs), ancestry-informative SNPs (aiSNPs), and phenotype-informative SNPs (piSNPs), were genotyped to uncover the genetic polymorphism of the Torghut Mongols. The STR genotyping results showed that 80 alleles (39 A-STRs, 25 Y-STRs, and 16 X-STRs; 14.4% of 554 alleles) identified in Torghut Mongols were not identified in Jalaid Mongols, while 155 alleles (84 A-STRs, 59 Y-STRs and 12 X-STRs; 24.6% of 630 alleles) identified in Jalaid Mongols were not observed in Torghut Mongols. Calculation of the forensic parameters demonstrated that the STRs and SNPs analyzed here could be employed in forensic applications. Interpopulation comparisons via principal component analysis (PCA), phylogenetic tree, and STRUCTURE analysis showed that the two Mongolian populations were closely related by their genetic background, although genetic differences were also discovered. When both the sequence-based A-STRs and iiSNPs were included in the STRUCTURE analysis, the Torghut population was more similar to the Uyghur population than to Jalaid Mongols, indicating certain population structure differences between the two Mongolian populations. The Y-DNA haplogroup prediction showed that although haplogroup C (C2-M217) was dominant in both Mongolian populations, haplogroup O2-M122 was rarely presented in Torghut Mongols, which differentiated the Torghut Mongols from the other Mongolian populations. This study not only uncovered the genetic features of the two Mongolian tribes, providing valuable frequency data for forensic applications, but the genetic patterns of the two Mongolian populations also provide a genetic evidence that the Torghut Mongols may have developed via the gradual intermixing of nomadic groups of Mongol and Turkic origin, as recorded in historical records. This study also highlighted the importance of building regional reference databases that consider both ethnic and geographic location information, instead of a more universal reference database, for forensic applications.
蒙古人在 13 世纪蒙古帝国的迅速扩张中,通过塑造欧亚大陆的文化和遗传结构发挥了关键作用。虽然蒙古帝国的历史方面有详细的记载,但对蒙古人群体遗传变异的研究仍然不足。在这项研究中,我们比较了居住在中国伊犁地区的 70 名图尔扈特蒙古人和居住在 3000 公里外的 88 名扎拉伊德蒙古人,研究了他们的遗传多样性。我们对 200 多个法医学相关遗传标记进行了基因分型,包括常染色体短串联重复序列(A-STRs)、X 染色体 STRs(X-STRs)、Y 染色体 STRs(Y-STRs)、身份信息单核苷酸多态性(iiSNPs)、种族信息单核苷酸多态性(aiSNPs)和表型信息单核苷酸多态性(piSNPs),以揭示图尔扈特蒙古人的遗传多态性。STR 基因分型结果表明,在图尔扈特蒙古人 80 个等位基因(39 个 A-STRs、25 个 Y-STRs 和 16 个 X-STRs;554 个等位基因的 14.4%)中未在扎拉伊德蒙古人发现,而在扎拉伊德蒙古人 155 个等位基因(84 个 A-STRs、59 个 Y-STRs 和 12 个 X-STRs;630 个等位基因的 24.6%)中未在图尔扈特蒙古人发现。法医参数的计算表明,这里分析的 STR 和 SNPs 可用于法医应用。通过主成分分析(PCA)、系统发育树和 STRUCTURE 分析进行的种群间比较表明,尽管发现了遗传差异,但这两个蒙古人群体的遗传背景非常相似。当将基于序列的 A-STRs 和 iiSNPs 都包含在 STRUCTURE 分析中时,图尔扈特人群与维吾尔族人群比与扎拉伊德蒙古人更相似,表明这两个蒙古人群体之间存在一定的群体结构差异。Y-DNA 单倍群预测表明,尽管单倍群 C(C2-M217)在两个蒙古人群体中占主导地位,但在图尔扈特蒙古人中很少出现单倍群 O2-M122,这使图尔扈特蒙古人有别于其他蒙古人群体。这项研究不仅揭示了这两个蒙古部落的遗传特征,为法医应用提供了有价值的频率数据,而且还提供了遗传模式,表明图尔扈特蒙古人可能是通过历史记录中记载的蒙古和突厥游牧民族的逐渐混合而发展起来的。该研究还强调了建立考虑民族和地理位置信息的区域性参考数据库的重要性,而不是使用更通用的参考数据库,以便于法医应用。